Soviet Afghan war

who was in the wrong here?

Attached: vdsc.jpg (400x322 87.73 KB, 1.25M)

Other urls found in this thread:

sciencespo.fr/mass-violence-war-massacre-resistance/en/document/kazakh-famine-beginnings-sedentarization
research.calvin.edu/german-propaganda-archive/goeb60.htm
twitter.com/AnonBabble

turns out CIAniggers are more effective than KGBolsheviks

The side against T-55chan.

Soviets were trying to keep their commie puppet going, while Mujahedin were mujahedining around. As in most wars, there were no good guys, only different shades of bad.

Islamists are always in the wrong, because it's the most destructive philosophy in existence since the aztec and mayan civilizations were ended. Although postmodernist cultural marxism is fighting hard for the #1 spot.

If Soviets had won, Afghanistan would have been civilized until the 90s, at which point it would have peacefully abandoned communism once it became clear the idea didn't work. The islamists won nothing, other than the destruction of their nation.

Might even have been Euro-tier now.

Attached: paghman_photo_scene_before_after_war.jpg (501x254 77.5 KB, 51.38K)

So basically their options where limited to Islamism, literal Marxism and cultural Marxism?

But there is something I say in their favour: among the whole bunch of fucked up people from over there the Afghans (at least, the Asian-looking ones, and there are more tribes to them than I care to remember) are the politest, who mostly mind their own business, and from what I heard from ZOGbots here, much more brave than, say, sandniggers.
Arabs of all kind are nigger-tier, with twice the birthrate. Roaches are the rudest motherfuckers I've ever known. Bud pakis are literally the worst, and indeed the dirtiest: they have just enough more intelligence than your average subhuman scum to Jew and rob you, but not nearly enough to not to fuck up even the Arab countries they invade. And when it comes to personal hygene, why I can tell you horror stories about them that'd make your average dirty basement-dwelling neckbeard who constantly has Cheetos dust in his beard and hasn't showered in a month crawl in his skin. Literal fucking cancer.

Yes, well that and feudalism. Capitalism requires a cultural framework that is difficult to maintain, as evinced by Europe and modern day West. By definition of capitalism, the Peoples Republic of China is more capitalist than any country in the West.

There is a joint cultural heritage here man.

...

The only thing that's bad about them is their aim.

Attached: k's_day_off.webm (640x480, 5.46M)

Afghanistan was civilized by the brits not the Soviet niggers.

Can't say I'm surprised. Enjoy your no-go zone Ahmed.

I bet you don't even shame sluts, you fucking faggot. Your carelessness is what will lead to the surgence of sodomites who perform the exact same rituals.

Attached: a46819c92916e866c3c07575e0d028279546cc7855e9739b2b2809c6508be91c.jpg (1600x900, 100.43K)

enjoy your med-resistant gonorrhea.
or your kids not looking like you.
Or scraping out 50 other guys' cum with your dick.
>>>/suicide/

Mujaheddin won only because they never read or were >taught about the might of the soviet army like Warsaw Pact countries have (^:

Who in their mind wants to support (((women liberation))) beyond sluts themselves and limp wristed faggots?

You know you're pozzed when even the Swede thinks you're a cuck.

The fuck is wrong with you guys.

Unfuck yourselves.

Attached: Wow.jpg (638x696, 188.56K)

Muslims and Christians have quite a lot in common, you'd be surprised.

...

Reminder that anything remotely sexual must be punished by death.

I think you'll find women in the west dressed similarly in the same period as this photo, it's a slippery slope unless dress codes are enforced.

kebabs get off my board

Attached: kebab recognition.webm (640x320, 7.38M)

Defendig sluts.
BURN THEM ALL ALIVE AND BE DONE WITH IT

Reminder that if your aren't raping sluts to death, you are part of the problem.

Kek what is this French Spitting Image?

Zig Forums may laugh India but this is absolutely regular normal Westerner besides Zig Forums, 100% cuck. This is your shitty cuck Western world. We grow big and strong in a time when Ahmed fuck your future shitty wife. And daily reminder, we ACTUALLY have space program, this is no funny meme.

Attached: 1432123084256.jpg (960x720, 84.08K)

The fuck is happening in that pic?

Images themselves are innocent (bait sort of innocent considering timeline context) but there is message. Your collection looks exactly like collection from communist posters that are accompanied by as slogan "Imma modern stronk independent womin who needs no man. And this is a good thing!" (note total lack of the man). Your was bombarded by such sort of message so much it become your unconsciousness You decided to post something that reflects USSR supposedly bringing progress into Afagsantan. Something good. Good thing. Click! Inside your head activates associative trigger and next thing you do is posting stronk independent womin. Your became a parrot mindlessly spurting commie memes after you hear trigger word.

I think you'll find that men wore what you consider miniskirts since we had clothes, we only switched to pants because they made riding horses easier, and your slippery slope is actually a high traction level surface. Ancient women had plunging necklines, showed their arms licentiously, and tied ropes under their tits to show them off, far more than women in those pics are doing.

If you are white, please gas yourself. We don't need MGTOW, asexual, asspie, virgin, beta cuck genes in the gene pool. The white gene pool is already full of that garbage to the brim, your kind, "dont think about sex until youre 30" renaissance era puritanism is solely responsible for declining birth rates of white people, because it isn't compatible with urbanization and industrialization.

If you're not white, also gas yourself, because you're not white.

Attached: 041614_1200_Theimpactof16.png (463x519 109.68 KB, 57.77K)

Birthrates dropped because of the urbanization you silly leaf.

Fug, I'm busted by the id :DD Now everyone will now there's no such thing as an actual Indian shitposter. What a shame.

>implying there's a difference :^)

Wrong.

There are cities with high birth rates, it completely disproves your hypothesis. Birth rates dropped because celibacy/puritanism isn't compatible with urbanized areas.

Puritanism works in rural areas because men don't interact with women that much. Men are generally outdoors with other men doing man work, while women are indoors doing woman work. Therefore even a girl in a burqa will be noticed by men, excite them, and result in reproduction. And a guy that is ugly as sin will be just as attractive to a rural girl.

But in an urban area women are all forced to be in close proximity to men 24/7, we are used to each other. Therefore both men and women have to use more drastic means of attracting attention, wear skimpier clothes, flirt more, and act more seductively. If anything birth control should be banned and men and women in cities should be encouraged to mate more.

Women should be encouraged to exercise, take care of themselves, wear more feminine clothing, wear makeup…. the average white woman wearing t-shirt, jeans and sneakers isn't encouraging enough white men to pursue, marry, and preggo them.

Pic eminently fucking related.

Which one of these would you impregnate?

Attached: derrieres.jpg (350x404, 29.43K)

That's a good joke. But seriously, this is one of my favorite hobbies - I'm not just getting fun with all those "go shit on the street" comments (even a jewtube viewers already use this meme widely) but also probably saving Pajeet lives since after all that "bullying" they observe online they'll finally realize the need for proper hygiene.

Show me at least one. Let me guess, you'll show decades-old data from an urbanized Islamic country like Iran, ignoring the fact their birthrates recently have dropped dramatically?
This isn't a "hypothesis", rather a well-known demographic fact. The worst negative externality of urbanization is young women not being able to grow children unlike their unemployed and uneducated rural opposites. Making it easier for employed/educated women to grow children is the main key to saving birthrates. And there are some actual solutions.

No you driveling idiot it's because of people not dying before they hit 20 while needing to have at least that many to get one to reproductive age, up front/ongoing monetary/time costs of a child, and finally in modern society you just don't need many people to do the same things.

Tl:dr it's an inevitable wind down that will occur when you stop being a 3rd or 2nd world shit hole.

They'll just murder the children or rather, bitch about the inability to have a state-funded murder commited.

Middle.

The truth is worse than you could ever imagine.

Can you fuck off? Islam is barely as fertile as Hispanics or Pajeets. Niggers are the worst threat, because you are paying for them to have sex and give births.


Suuure. The Jew inventions of celibacy, public indoctrination centers, and abstinence-only sex ed had nothing to do with it. They even got that fucker Kellog to CIRCUMCISE EVERY AMERICAN to make it harder for them to fuck.

You sound like a Jew. Go buy a motorcycle or a dog and take yourself out of the gene pool. The West taxes 1/3 of a what a citizen makes, nigger tier countries and china tax 1/10. If you want to talk about child costs talk about why you arent using the welfare money you already paid for your own kids.


The immoral ones will, and they'll be taken out of the gene pool. Besides white women abort least often, because they have the empathy gene all whites have. Seriously the present-day situation is not working, arguing for the status quo isn't going to impress me.

That's exactly what I'm talking about - due to urbanization their birthrate have fallen recently. In 2015 Iran had like 1,68 births per woman, while in 1985 there was insane 6,22. Those numbers are fully available online.
So, I'm still waiting for your data on highly fertile cities.
Pajeets are still highly fertile (2,4 births per woman), which is no wonder with their low urbanization rate and uneducated/barely employed women.

It's not due to urbanization, its due to their philosophies not fitting into urban centres. For fucks sake urbanization isn't something that we can control, it's a law of nature, resources are concentrated exponentially not linearly.

What we CAN do is begin to behave as in 1850-1950 people did, take better care of ourselves, and put more effort into signalling fertility.

There's no need to resist it, mankind simply needs to enforce ways of saving fertility within cities. This isn't that hard.
Lel.

All this sperging because right off the bat one retard couldn't accept the user's comment saying both options are bad. Wow.

What cities? How much of that increase is from low IQ nog tier trash genes. You can't just encourage women to hyper sexualize even further and assume the instinctual fucking that will ensue is enough to produce a great society without considering other variables. Absolute neeg brains. Peut-être que vous venez d'Haïti?

You need to encourage the family and family planning, not just fucking. This is what 'puritanism' or a conservative approach does. All else equal, a person who finds 1 person (something tells me lipstick and heels being absent won't prevent men from instinctually finding one person they want to reproduce with IF they want to reproduce) to ever have sex with but has 4 kids is obviously better than someone fucking 20 people with supermodel looks and being childless because there is no incentive beyond hyper sexual looks. You're acting like we are gonna dress up virgins in turbo slut uniforms, release them in the cities to noble men, and all will be fine but in reality you have a turbo slut culture already full of turbo slut uniforms where people don't want to reproduce. It is not for lack of sexually attractive women. Cut any form of contraception. Educate people on what leads to divorce (promiscuité) and explain how broken homes effect future generations. Kill nihilism, kill materialistic individualism, kill feminism of course making soyboys, get xenoestrogens out of the food, make people CARE about future generations beyond themselves. End docile pharma garbage. Get added fluoride out of the tap and toothpaste there is plenty in water naturally. End porn. End no fault divorce. Destroy single mother welfare. Glorify the traditional mother. You need to make people financially stable or reform peoples perception of what they need to be financially stable. Go figure this is more difficult in urban areas. So cut welfare, affirmative action, illegals deflating white wages and increasing taxes, jewish consumerism, chinese and jews inflating real estate. Home loan for every married couple then 25% forgiven for each child you have. You need to rid any non whites who will fuck all this up.

Ok. Took your shitty bait on Zig Forums of all places damn. Good day.

Well first of all it's the afghan/afghan war, the soviet intervention didn't started the war, just like the US intervention in vietnam didn't start the war.
The afghan insurrection started waaaaayyyy before that in the early 70's after the King use force to quell unrest due to a famine.
After that you had the first commie coup of 1973 then the second commie coup of 1978 when the first commie dictator (cousin of the king) got cold feet and got killed and replace by the second commie dictator, then the THIRD commie coup, when the second commie dictator got murdered by the third, then soviet invasion proper (AKA "we're tired of afghan commie bullshit") in 1979, where Spetznaz directly killed the third commie dictator with operation Шторм-333 and put in place the fourth…

Afghanistan was led by commies heavily backed by the USSR from 1953 to 1992… Saying that the USSR "invaded" in 1979 is in itself propaganda.
It's like saying the US invaded Vietnam…

What's actually funny is that the soviets by 1979 were a galaxy away of the batshit insane commies of the 30's (or even the 50's), that still prevailed ideology-wise in Afghanistan.
Essentially the soviets were happy with the first, royal prime minister then socialist dictator, which was replaced by a redder one, which raised big concerns (and started losing control of the country) which was replaced by an even redder one which warranted an IMMEDIATE REMOVAL notice because of how red that guy was and he was guarantee to end up with his head on spike.

It's an actual intervention as in the psychological one… because they were losing a country where essentially an ultra-majority of factions were simply different shades of communism!
Nobody in Afghanistan actually wanted the ass-backwards Islamism and peasants rules socialists had decent achievements and a really big support base…
People become more and more attracted to that after decades on inner strife and endless war amongst the "progressives" (and heavy financial support from KSA/CIA did the rest).

left maybe middle

I've heard that accusation from both domestic lefties and "enlightened" foreigners before. Basically the way it goes is the way it always has

Communism was a mistake, but at least communism only killed communists.

Attached: serveimage.jpg (1024x682, 89.33K)

This>>557832

/out/

Attached: they removed cleavage.gif (448x261, 4.98M)

Nah, just teach kids to fuck like animals whenver they want but teach about the benefits of abortion or irreversibly damaging your hormonal balance.
Trust state appointed (((pedologists))) to teach your children about butt sex.

Oh you, and your continuation with attack on the man. It clearly reveals you feminist patterns. Why don't you post something that reflects progress and better future for Afghani men? Well because it is opposite to everything you was told by female teachers who surrounded you all your life. In this teaching there is no future for the men. They are not in the picture. There is nothing to post.

Really look at these Afghani men, backbone of their backwards medieval peasant society. Oh wait, you feel sick. Just imagine these lips can touch woman, or even unthinkable they are taking out their unwashed penises and putting in some young girl vagina. Wew, you are gonna vomit and faint at same time from such atrocious act of male oppression. What progress and life improvement can you offer for these men? Right only thought in your head is to bomb them with napalm and scatter ashes on the wind. You want nothing to do with these medieval peasant. You want to build walled garden in the desert and prance around in the miniskirt far way from peasants who will pay this with taxes (or slave work in the case of the soviet commies with their kolkhozes). Your definition of progress and happy life.

Attached: afgh.jpg (1199x848 1.3 MB, 128.9K)

Wew lad

As much as you allow, with your "lets not look at women until 30" philosophy.

It's normal sexualize. I'm not saying women should wear clubwear daily, just FEMININE CLOTHES NOT MASCULINE CLOTHES. Fucking moron. Kill yourself.


You're a kike if you place anything over your children. Especially your fucking money, which is what you're doing.
No they're fucking not, even according to Jews "dont breed" institutions children cost 13k a year which is a fucking pittance compared to what they give you.


How about stop teaching kids to prevent babies OR kill them?


KYS cuck.

Didn't read the rest of your cuck homosexual post but I can guess it would be cuckish and homosexual.

Any woman that dresses like the ones you posted are asking to be raped and mutilated.

Why don't you post some propaganda images that represents your version of Afghani men life improvements brought by soviets? Pro tip: your mind can't compute such images.

sciencespo.fr/mass-violence-war-massacre-resistance/en/document/kazakh-famine-beginnings-sedentarization

Attached: 45.jpg (550x300, 39.5K)

Is this a joke post? I can't tell if you're trolling or joking.

Attached: kabul1979.jpg (570x788 69.55 KB, 79.58K)

Yeppers, asking for it. They're asking for a lifetime of marriage.

Attached: afghanistan44.jpg (600x422, 131.96K)

...

Oh dear.

Seeing his mom get turned into a cumdragon by somalis broke his mind.

For the people ITT who think it is somehow "red pilled" to be sterile.

research.calvin.edu/german-propaganda-archive/goeb60.htm

>An example. In a major central German city an advertising poster for a soap company showed a fresh, attractive girl holding the soap package in her hands. A moral knight who unfortunately had the right to determine the fate of this poster forbade its distribution on the ground that it offended the moral sensibilities of the population, since the woman in the poster was holding the soap in a place “that for moral reasons cannot be described more precisely.”

>Save us from these hypocritical creatures who have no genuine strong conception of life, and who in reality preach no honest morality. They generally are life’s losers, protesting life itself. Eternal life and its laws will hardly make way for them; at most, they will hide behind a screen of contemptible hypocrisy and dishonest prudery.

Notice how it's ALWAYS THE SAME MEME-PICS of Afghanistan posted on imageboards? Almost as if these "progressive" Afghans were only a tiny minority and not representative of the Afghani people as a whole, hm?

Attached: a5e4b90ecf2e946491b9cbccfdeac8e4e502058df111166d69dc4a51e7e2a4b3.png (516x810, 529.33K)

On one side the Soviet intervention in Afghanistan only happened, because Communism failed in Afghanistan like it did everywhere else.
On the other side the Soviets are clearly a much more advanced society than the Islamistic shithead they fought, even despite the fact that they are shitty Commies.

So as a advocate of Civilization I have to side with the Soviets even if they were in the wrong.


Its a spiel the Allied invented during WW2, so they could justify "liberating" Europe from Germany in the name of their puppet exile regimes.
Since the Allied won WW2, its no wonder that this is an acceptable behavior in today's world.

The comparison photos were made for use on imageboards, this is like complaining that the costanza guy has only one photo.

There are more if you actually try to search. The major restriction isn't some conspiracy, it's that this happened in the 70s and every other pic was burned in the following 40 years of war before people could scan and upload them to the net.

A tiny minority is still a larger amount of the population than literally 0 people

Just like all the Auschwitz corpses, hm.

$13,000x18=$234,000
$234,000x2.1=$491,400

Attached: cooper strobe.gif (500x360, 83.91K)

That's the high estimate from people trying to scare you into not having kids, these people also artificially inflate it because they're running the foster market. If you want ghetto tier it's about $4,000 a year per kid.

And that doesn't count the fact that if you have multiple kids, they basically become their own daycare, so each subsequent kids costs less. It also doesn't count tax benefits of having kids, which for me are PICREL. Or the retirement benefits of having children, instead of hiring a nigger to take care of you so they can beat you with a sock full of soap every evening.

Face it even in pure Jew-tier economic consideration, having kids makes sense. There is no other way to look at it.
If having kids didn't make money sense, Jews wouldn't have kids.

Attached: 18928307af6c4981341d2b02d681f35ed204f863b08f9d7fe655132450ff2d68 - Copy.png (837x545, 30.08K)

Get with the program shlomo, your handlers already decided you're on the 'okay it's actually happening but it's a good thing' stage. Goddamn do you want to get paid or not?

1. It doesn't help your point by claiming almost $500k is nothing.
2. Also why not point out the lower more realistic figures from the start then if it's so wildly off?
Nah not adding to that problem nor doing the "fuck you I got mine" if can get the tax system unfucked, both of those mindsets are what's damaged this country so much.
How many kids are the jews having?


>>/out/

1. That's the high estimate. You would be earning about 50k a year along with your spouse, earning 50k a year, to fall into that category. Tell me again how it's insurmountable.
2. Why would I oversell my argument and exaggerate? It's the point to undersell it and see if it stands?

About as many as other Semites. The only reason Juice aren't as numerous as Mudslimes is the C-C-C-Combo breakers every 100 years or so.

Wanna make Zig Forums mad? Claim the invasion was imperialism

user people during the industrial revolution managed to have a tone of kids, despite being directly much harder jewed than we today.
You can have several children sleep in one room, which also accidentally guarantees that they don't become basement dwellers/hikikomori, leave home as early as possible to have their own space and don't sit on your pocket when they are already in the twenties.
Once you have several children, you can save money by using the stuff the older kids have outgrown as "hand me downs" for the younger kids. Many people on Zig Forums have a huge fetish for patches, but the original use for them was to change the appeal of clothes and fix holes.
You can save a shit tone of money, by buying food in bulk. The grocery store and fucking super market wasn't invented for singles or childless couples, if you already life on your own you should have noticed that you are either paying too much or buying too much for one person alone at these type of stores.
Also in Western Society there are extra social events that friends and family of people with kids are expected to organize, where they are gifting stuff you need for your child. Only very few women who have a child, don't get to have a "baby party" made by their close friends.
And instead of paying for child care, you can let your parents/uncle/aunts/older kids watch the younger kids or just lets them run around outside and let them grow up as normal human being, knowing the child care worker can't try to shove pozz ideology down their throat as early as possible.
And last but not least, the whole shit gives your life a reason. Instead of just living your life and slowly wasting away on more and more scarce growing resources, you at least helped to perpetuate your race and people regardless how your family turns out.

1. Both the husband and wife working at jobs that make 50k a year leaving neither available to actually take care of the the kids or 100k for the husband in a traditional working arrangement.
2. But if 13k per year is way higher than needed why would it be an exaggeration?
Yet they consistently make up low single digits percents in just about any country they've been in both before and after getting shoahed.
Something isn't adding up here.


They had more kids precisely because they where getting jewed so hard, remember they had to make child labor illegal because of how bad it was getting.
Germany these are our future not juden, ease off on stuffing em in battery cages
Also I'm rural and as a result of that there's a tendency of treating a piece of land like a miniature kingdom to protect so there's very little moving away.
As I grew I had very noticeable spurts that were far enough apart for my clothes to wear out in the meantime (threadbare worn out, not a mendable hole here or there worn out) and that pattern will surely pass on.
We've done that for years.
That's usually a one time thing here.
My parents did some of that though they still paid my one grandmother to do it since she had been a housewife all her life and didn't really have much money of her own (as a result of my grandfather being on dialysis for years and dying a few years after I'd been born didn't leave him with much to give her).
I don't have a problem with having kids just stating the reasons why people don't have kids.
With that said I'm not going to knowingly put someone from my own bloodline through what you're describing for nothing other than bragging rights of being the last to starve to death on a dying planet, the shitskins can have that kind of hopeless future.

Attached: chose your next cheat very carfully.png (146x90, 30.53K)