The inner party (of gun owners)

>keeping and selling muh machine gun investments for twice the price
>just being a (((capitalist))) goy

fuckers like this need to hang high first. they are complicit in the slavery of us.

Attached: fuck_curtis.PNG (1846x753, 238.01K)

Supported by the NRA!

Attached: nralies.jpg (1280x720 151.42 KB, 7.79M)

It's fun making them sperg out when you say "Repeal the NFA"

Wew.

depends on what the fuck he meant by existing. regardless, an absolute waste.

it is. they show their true colors as slimy scumbags who care nothing about the 2nd amendment, just they own it and you don't.
imagine being such a stupid investor to invest in something that only holds value because of a law.

>(((capitalist)))
You won't fool anyone commie scum. Go play some Zelda.

Attached: Vasectomy_b8288c_6498200.jpg (1200x886, 98.22K)

Stop being poor and just buy them

Attached: ClipboardImage.png (550x657, 650.03K)

Rat bastards.

Thank you Japan kun, you spoke how I wanted to the moment I read it.

>just being a (((capitalist))) goy

Attached: 9d1c856d2ac149d3710f000d7451889f44987fdafca22bcc84385c5a993481ad.jpg (500x375, 17.55K)

Ok, I'm leaving.

Attached: 354.jpg (360x403, 71.45K)

...

...

k. please take your lack of critical thinking skills with you brainlet.

must be fun being this retarded.

Attached: 3da9fb77bfe106e2f8da8467bb9ac4242b9f8341e3d630dd608433e96cb6f040.gif (347x244, 3.56M)

Nip once again shows he knows more about economics and American values than most Americans.

Fuck gun control, but most of those who beach about "muh MAC-10 for 5k $, how dare you want to make profit!" are those who jewed to pay 200$ before 1986.

Attached: 4e51f1a9821da6641e6dc0aed63da02d5ff00537a208bc2f7ec21b63f5247253.jpg (665x465, 64.46K)

Attached: 35889955b435588e41b7fb18ae51890bde1d4d003a74ce39b85c06cfabc5a735.gif (500x281, 711.74K)

half the people of voting age in 1986 weren't even alive during the 30's when america got their tax stamps. i don't know of a single person who is against the hughes amendment but in favor of the NFA, what are you basing this on?

I dont understand question.

Attached: f22f2ce1a62f1bb6f963704475d9c68f33156c79eb174816903df3915eee6679.jpg (640x640, 100.5K)

You faggots realize these people are literally the 1% of 1% among gun owners right? They aren't the ones stopping legislation from uncucking the limits we have on the 2nd Amendment

so would you call that Crony Capitalism?

Gommunism was never a choice because gommunism is a re-branded utopian socialism that neither ever existed nor could exist because of its extreme utopianism (i.e. retardation) admitted by basically everyone. Lefturds not only suck in actual economy science, you also know shit about your own autistic deviations. I'm so glad in the recent years you subhumans finally got banned there, you're getting bullied irl and police literally arrests you for commie pictures on social media. Now go back to your cuckshed called Zig Forums.

You forgot
It's not the fact they're making money on the guns or even against the repeal, it's the fact they're traitorous bastards that would be more than happy to throw the rest of the gun owning population under the bus to make a profit.

It isn't more of a make a profit issue its more of losing a ton of money issue.

But they aren't losing any money, you idiot. You can't lose by putting in $250 capital and "only" getting $2500 instead of $25000 out of it because your country's socialist market regulations were repealed. You're $2250 in the green, this is still a 900% net gain on investment. It's literally about "saving" NFA items as "investments" so that you can put them in a trust when you retire and be part of a privileged group. They have nothing, personally or economically, to lose from those guns being devalued. It just lowers their artificial gains that they put in zero effort to get. Stop defending Jewery, you useful idiot.

Attached: PHOTO_20160511_105744.jpg (2560x1440, 1.33M)

I burn leaves in my yard

Investment or not, opposing repeal because you're afraid of taking a financial hit makes you a traitor.

You can invest in material wealth that will never actually mean something or you can invest in the rights of your nation's future which will pay for itself. It is better to be a poor man living free than a rich man in a gilded cage.

Whoa, did I say I support them getting pissy at people wanting the NFA and everything that came after repealed? Some dingdong out there spent 1/4 million on a MG and with a repeal that investment turns into absolutely fuck all, most of them are concerned with their precious object becoming a market valued object. Personally speaking most of them need to be tar'd and feathered then thrown off a boat for not supporting a NFA repeal.

go away alex. having daddy's money doesn't make you shit faggot.

Attached: 971d2e831a91a6170937f11eac7c6ee38157d7b987111e22f54377ec6fd008eb.png (275x407, 98.41K)

You know what could have saved this thread? Some actual evidence. Leadership of pro-gun organizations are public. So are voting records. Frantically pointing out that people who have a potential economic interest in a policy is not the same as demonstrating that they actually agitate, let alone conspire to keep that policy in place.

Take the NRA for example. Can it be demonstrated that members of its board possess a significant financial interest in grandfathered GCA / NFA items? Are they known associates of any such people? Have there been any internal votes within the NRA which went a certain way because of these individuals? Any policy announcements? Anything at all? It seems plausible, but OP couldn't take the cocks out of his mouth long enough to do the groundwork.

They're cutting off supply, not creating demand.

More precisely, not only they have artifically made the supply curve almost-vertical, but they have also violated the basic condition for a free market, or an optimal solution, to exist by grossly violating the fundamental requirement that property laws should be transferrable.

You're right. If you stick to simple economic theory it is a forced reduction on supply. My bad.
Now, in practice, it works as a marketing tool too effectively having both effects at the same time. Let's say there is no ban on full-auto, but -just like with suppressors- you need a tax stamp to get it (or a similar bureaucratic procedure+extra money).
I don't think every potential buyer (people interested in the feature and with enough money) would care nearly as much for full auto if it wasn't a scarse product. Turning it into a limited product gives it a collectible status, thus making it desireable to people that otherwise wouldn't bother with it. Thinking of it as Nazi shit: Would there be demand for Nazi stuff if they were still relevant and on power?


I'm not asian

At least the nips understand basic free market ideas.

Attached: 1468630614558.jpg (1023x885, 61.37K)

Does anybody have a screen shot of that Subgun rant?

this

Honestly, it's not disregard, but it's not surprising. Why would you expect otherwise?

The one about the usefulness of subguns versus pistols and full length rifles?

Seriously when you say that you sound just as retarted as Commies who claim the USSR wasn’t real socialism.

Except real capitalism happens every single time someone trades without any coercion whatsoever, such as when someone trades corn over the fence for eggs, or trades their machining skills for silver slips, and merely requires the enforcement whether by government or otherwise of don't hit, don't steal, don't defraud, in other words a simpler version of most society.

Real communism can never happen as it's ideal is the absolute control over every resource possible in order to have everyone get an equal outcome. A perfect capitalist society is achievable today without much trying, as it merely requires the enforcement of a handful of laws. The fact that you attempted to try and say that libertarians and ancaps are just the other side of the coin of commies reveals just how much of a brainlet you are, you colossal faggot.

Attached: 1.jpeg (680x622, 68.23K)

Capitalism is not just "economic transactions". I see this all the time when people bring up "capitalism is the natural state of humanity" example. If you think of it that way, every communist/socialist country also had capitalism because people bartered and money was printed.

Capitalism is when goods are produced using privately owned means of production for the purpose of selling it.
If you're farmer Joe and you grow a variety of crops (like a good sustenance farmer should) and you trade your surplus of corn this year to farmer Bob for his surplus of eggs, that's NOT capitalism.
If you're farmer Joe and you grow corn with the intention of trading it, or selling that corn for a medium of exchange, in order to buy the things you want, that's capitalism.

These fuckers were partially the reason our gun laws went to total shit.
Guess what? THE LAWS NEVER FUCKING LOOSENED.
NOW THOSE GUNS THEY BOUGHT TO SELL ARE ILLEGAL SO ALL THAT MONEY THEY SPENT WENT DOWN THE SHITTER AND THEY COMPLAIN ABOUT THEIR LOST INVESTMENTS.

Attached: 20000% MAD.gif (500x800, 283.84K)

Why don't you just get a South American proxy so people will stop thinking you're a nip, you filthy fucking spic?

Why the 'tism? Media of exchange aren't at all necessary for capitalism to exist. They greatly facilitate capitalism, and as such there are multiple very strong incentives to use one, but barter isn't excluded from capitalistic transactions.

user, your phrasing was retarded.
Apologize you fag.

Attached: angryDoggie.jpg (843x1034, 366.01K)

nigger. are you fucking serious. let's use some critical thinking skills.
i was mocking curtis you room temp iq fuck.

pull the trigger you fucking brainlet. i doubt there would be much of a splat.

Attached: ded.PNG (565x542, 638.36K)

The fields used to grow crops are a means of production, dumbass. If farmer Joe owns his own farm, he is a capitalist, even if he barters away his surplus produce instead of selling it for money.

Yes that is, just because there's no money involved doesn't mean it's not capitalism. If farmer Joe owns his farm and can run his farm to grow whatever he wants using his own capital, that's capitalism. If farmer Joe didn't own his farm and had to run his farm to grow what the government wants him to grow, that's communism.

...