WINNER OF THE ENLOE AWARD 2014

kinda like this?

Attached: japanese_car_security.webm (320x240, 4.93M)

Kind of like that, but with a v8 diesel instead of that little battery thingy, and with a control system that is programmed to seek out and penetrate virgin buttholes, and maybe a net launcher or harpoon in a coaxial mounting just to be sure.

What language is this in?

Postmodern horseshit


Those departments throw a tismfit when called out on their shit.
Usually they complain how its totally the fault of the predatory publisher and not the people who peer review the word salads they consider articles, then go back to submitting to the same publishers when attention wanes.

Sokal's hoax paper "Transgressing the Boundaries: Towards a Transformative Hermeneutics of Quantum Gravity" and the more recent "The Conceptual Penis as a Social Construct" by Boghossian and Lindsay does a pretty good job at exposing the scholarship to be nothing but a massive unintelligible circlejerk.

Attached: 0817f40f3aba42d88af08f6d23057a4f53a65ad4bfdbb5f5e5a1f8fb9a3b4261.jpg (710x710, 75.43K)

skeptic.com/downloads/conceptual-penis/23311886.2017.1330439.pdf


I'm trying to work on a summary of that in actual language, but pic related really is my face when. So far all I've got is something along the lines of

Please tell me that the publishers & reviewers were in on this joke. Please. Dear God, is that too much to ask?

Attached: What the fuck am I reading.gif (200x200, 234.02K)

Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm?

Attached: Hmmm.png (299x180, 8.37K)

elsewhere.org/journal/pomo/ Here's your answer (^:
I can publish a post modernist book with it.
one per day.

Sorry user but western universities are full of retards like that, and your tax dollars subsidize them :^)

Attached: Jordan Peterson - Why you have to fight Postmodernism.webm (420x236, 14.9M)

I'll do my best attempt to translate. This shit is like going through a Slaaneshi text

Penises exist on men, but since "men" who decide they're women also have penises (before they get them lopped off), an actual, physical penis as representative of maleness is an incoherent construct. (They believe transgendered men are actually 100% women, even before they cut their dicks off or have any sort of "therapy". In essence, they're saying some women have penises, so the physical penis can't represent masculinity.)
We argue that the conceptual penis is better understood not as an anatomical organ but as a social construct isomorphic to preformative toxic masculinity.
The penis as an organ itself isn't what gives a man his oppressive, masculine powers, but rather the idea of a penis and the actions that idea inspire.
Apparently, society is damaged by the idea that a man gets his shitlord powers from his actual, physical dong rather than the idea of his dong. They're going to prove this with marxist mumbo-jumbo and examples of climate change.

Attached: 1464702588198.jpg (1920x1080, 885.62K)

wew.
At least Cernovich tells you to pirate his books.