What do you think of using rocket systems to replace sniper rifles?

A knife? Isn't that sorta like the thing you put on the end of the rifle to make it MOAR CHOPPY!?

Attached: Bayonet, in your face..png (500x333, 261.42K)

If you're going to make that kind of post at least put some effort into it.

Attached: bin_that_knife.webm (480x360, 2.46M)

Tried to attach that webm, but for some reason the post stuck at 55%, 4 times. Which lead to me picking a smaller file.

t. martian

is 100% right, the costs of using a rocket launcher don't outweigh the benefits, especially with arms companies charging insanely high prices per rocket.

>t. jew

feels like a monty python sketch.

That's because most of those seem to be hand built. If you have a factory that produces them at a rate similar to the rate of wet farts a lactose intolerant person produces after 3 pints of milk, price could go down. Mil Contracts work in stupid ways. Most manufacturers keep the price per unit up from the first batch they sold. Meaning that the rocket in question doesn't cost less if you order more and if the first order was miniscule, you're paying out the ass because of same PPU for the second, larger one.
This is what happened to the B2 and it also explains the prices HK demanded for XM25 and XM25 ammo.
However, if you make it clear that you will be ordering lots and lots of the munition in question from the beginning, price suddenly drops significantly and you can now expect a reasonable price for your ultra long range high value target elimination system, i.e. single missile with either kinetic penetrator or very small explosive charge. Think 40mm halved.

I was insulting you, moron, not making a statement. You are officially too dumb to make fun of.