To make a long story short, the laws of the USA protect handguns.
To argue about the intention of the law gets silly quickly. The USA was founded by revolutionaries. Now the technology of gunmaking has had its own revolution.
To make a long story short, the laws of the USA protect handguns.
To argue about the intention of the law gets silly quickly. The USA was founded by revolutionaries. Now the technology of gunmaking has had its own revolution.
Other urls found in this thread:
Good job real China, you figured out common knowledge.
Take it from me, the people who want to ban guns won't care.
When gun control failed to stop violent crime in the UK they just blamed something else. Liberals refuse to ever acknowledge that guns aren't the problem, it would require them to completely restructure their belief system relating to crime.
Is there any excuse left for the libs?
Libs are the problem.
It really is true that the problem libshits have with salt guns is that they're black, isn't it?
They know black people commit more crime, but they can't admit it, so they ascribe the death dealing abilities onto black plastic to fit with the popular political agenda.
the idea is to make whites an increasingly minor segment of the population, while systematically disarming us, so we can't defend ourselves when jamal gets a hankering for aryan loli
decreasing and disarming the white population have the same effect- reducing the military power of white americans to ensure a complete genocide
northwest front tbh but instead of the 3 1/2 states bs just move to Washington for a last stand tbh
The purpose of the OP was to show that 3-D printing has changed the status quo.
This was supposed to be a thread about 3-D printing making gun control impossible.
I have failed in my posting and will now commit sudoku by flipping the switch on my sudoku robot (pic related).