Question: Is axing Roe v Wade as if that will ever happen good or bad for us? Abortions a shit and only serve to further the country's degeneracy and moral decline, but on the other hand the vast majority of those who get abortions are spics and niggers, and the few whites who do are commies. Removing abortions means more niglets and with them a larger leftist voter base.
Untitled
Charles Anderson
William Clark
It would just make it state level, no?
Xavier Ortiz
Personally I agree with
The federal government should only have any say on matters occurring between states. Anything that only occurs in one state should be a state issue. Why should a Californian get to have a say on how things will be run within the state of North Dakota? Similarly, the state government should only concern itself with inter-city issues. A person from New York City should not have a say on an issue that only pertains to upstate New York.
On issues such as these, the rule should be: what is the smallest political unit in which the issue is entirely contained? That is the political unit that should make a decision on the issue. Something that never leaves a city should not be decided on by people outside that city in the state, and something that never leaves a state should not be decided on by other states in the country.
The one area where I would allow federal intervention on state or local issues is if a state or locality passes a law which infringes upon a right guaranteed in the Constitution. The Constitution applies to all areas in the union, so the rights enshrined in the Bill of Rights must be maintained everywhere. If the Constitution does not explicitly mention (not hurr durr the Interstate Commerce Clause says the government can force you to buy health insurance), it should be either a state or local issue.
Jordan Torres
Roe V Wade is a red herring, it's the "hand" of the magician that you're supposed to look at, not the hand that's actually doing the trick.
Making everyone who is normal pay for abortions is the real issue, abortions should be legal and niggers should pay out of pocket for their mistakes.
This isn't me btw.
Jace James
archives.gov
Find "abortion".
Jose Adams
I agree with all of you wholeheartedly on principle. What I'm asking is, pragmatically speaking, does the theoretical increase in muh freedoms and reducing federal overreach that reversing Roe v Wade imply a greater benefit to us, compared to the detriment of millions of niglets not being born and growing up to be lefty voters?
Logan Baker
i think Gorsuch will shape up to be close to scalia level. at least as good as thomas. thomas recuses himself too much for my taste.
Kennedy was shit for a GOP pick, but he still helped with DC v Heller. other than that, one of his best decisions as a justice was to fuck off while we still hold both the white house and the senate.
Julian Robinson
abortions are pretty much the only reason niggers aren't already a majority. it's pretty much the best way to reduce gun crime
Adam Brown
Which is why this is a complicated issue. If you don't agree that life begins at conception, how can you expect to argue on the same plane of understanding as people that think it does? You can say all humans are entitled to life under the Constitution, but abortion advocates say they aren't humans yet. This is one thing I think should be solved at the federal level.
Blake Bell
Areas infested with blacks are democrat run anyways, with the possible exception of Georgia. Abortion is going to be 100% legal in the areas where blacks are plentiful.