Trump administration not acting like fags for once

Military should focus on combat not gender politics
Ever since James Mattis was appointed by President Donald Trump as defense secretary, he has made no secret of his commitment to maintain and improve the effectiveness and caliber of the United States military.
“I’m not subtle,” Mattis told GOP lawmakers earlier this year. “I need to make the military more lethal.”
According to a report from The Washington Times, the United States Army just took a huge step to ensure that its soldiers will continue to be the most effective and powerful force on Earth.
In what is a major shift from the Obama administration era, fighting and battlefield skills will now take priority over social justice issues like transitioning transgender troops.
In service-wide memorandums obtained by The Washington Times, military leaders are making optional what used to be mandatory training on transgender transition, drug abuse and other issues.
The memorandums were approved by both Army Secretary Mark Esper and Chief of Staff Gen. Mark Milley.
“The move, Army leaders argue, is designed to relieve stress on the overburdened troop training regimen and refocus on soldiers’ ability to fight in combat,” The Washington Times reported.
The Chief of the Army’s collective training division Col. John O’Grady said that the former training requirements “served as barriers to maximizing time … to build readiness and lethality” within combat units.
“The Army’s regulations and policies that deal with training were pretty settled, and there were not a lot of detractors to it. … It was all the other [training] requirements that we levied on ourselves, or we had levied from other places” that led to the burdensome approach to combat readiness, O’Grady explained.
These changes will bring the Army in line with the Pentagon’s new National Defense Strategy under President Trump, and the policy initiatives of Defense Secretary Mattis, which include more focus on challenging rivals such as Russia and China, and increasing the military’s overall lethality.
In addition to doing away with mandatory non-combatant training, the Army is also extending the time soldiers spend in infantry training. “Soldiers graduating from the nine-week basic training course will now spend an additional two months in advanced individual training before heading to their first duty stations,” The Washington Times reported.
“The military is expected to prepare its members in warfare: to kill, destroy, and break our enemies. The most important factors in preparing a strong military are not hormone therapy, surgical sex changes, or politically correct education,” wrote speaker and author Walt Heyer for The Daily Signal. “We need psychologically fit, emotionally sound, highly trained troops to protect our nation from its enemies.”
Under the leadership of Trump and Mattis, military men and women can take comfort that they will be prepared for the challenges they will face on the battlefield and be spared from Obama era indoctrination.
westernjournal.com/ct/army-chucks-obamas-pc-training-re-focuses-on-killing-the-enemy/
archive.is/libzZ

Attached: 33CDDB1D-D6EB-418D-8DC5-76BC495F792E.jpeg (720x480, 48.01K)

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Libertarian_socialism
hooktube.com/watch?v=gYPAvT-3Fvs

When a democracy has devolved to the point of defining its core values as egalitarian libertarianism, then the hierarchical authoritarian institutions of the state, like the Armed Forces are inevitably going to be ineffective and occupied with trivial civil issues, especially when a nation's Armed Forces are defining themselves as protectors of democracy and consequently self-cucked from restoring natural order with a coup.

Speaking of making the military actually competent, how do we finally kick out the literal walking vaginas out of our military? I'm tired of seeing female paratroopers being shown everywhere in the media and having ads everywhere bragging about female officers in the army.

What the fuck, why are these stupid women in there? Passing the barebones training doesn't quality you for war you stupid bitch.

Those two things are in direct opposition to one another.
Polite sage for autistic nitpicking.

They don't even pass basic training. A "good" score for females is a failing score for males in the military.

(checked)
Zig Forumstards like can't even into actual politics

What are you, gay?

Oh my fuck! What did I miss? Last time I checked the only women in Specialneeds Forces were in office duties. What's next? OYKoudes? (pic related)

Attached: frogbutt.gif (480x600 565.82 KB, 27.42K)

I was referring to
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Libertarian_socialism
not your fictional anarchocapitalist honeypot that has never been tried .

That one does make sense though. Isn't there an absolute shitload of drug use in the military? You want soldiers in fighting condition, but strung out on who knows what.

Good thing the likes of you will never step foot in the military. Kill yourself immediately.

They should provide drug abuse training going into the military during boot camp and when leaving the military as counseling. If your combat soldiers want to be fucked up on drugs during their free time, just let them. They're bustin' their balls out there for Israel.

I'm all for ditching libtard gender shit, but didn't widespread drug abuse really fuck us over in nam?

Another contrition

Nigga you just went full MGTOW.

By darwinian degree without a penis your attempts to to stay alive are moot in the long term.

It's simply not natural to be isolated away from women in sausagefests for too long and even if militant rape was allowed to blow some steam our only option would be female turkroaches. Females in the armed forces are not always bad news as long as they know their place as moral boosters and are kept away from combat duties and for ornamental and a few logistical roles.

See pic related.


Secretaries don't need a rank and a uniform, just keep them in the civilian corps.

Attached: left libertarianism doesn't exist.png (752x1668, 66.73K)

An oxymoron as it may be it still is a by far a more influential position in real politics than good intended minarchist fiction that went fully subverted by kikes.

Attached: lolbergism.png (960x544, 442.1K)

Being logically consistent is irrelevant when they have successfully subverted the "liberal" title since the Reign of Terror and are the predominant ideology in the West if not the whole world ever since.

Which as strengths go is pretty weak. Constantly worrying about realpolitik and mass appeal is how you get milquetoast cuckservatives, and isn't sustainable in the long run. Hence why the left is beginning to lose ground in public opinion.

Good point.

Who cares? The US military is a tool for Israel

They aren't though

Please go back to Zig Forumseddit

The interesting thing I've always found here is that the Jews that ended up being libertarian aren't very Jewish at all, and have usually been ostracized from the Tribe. Hell, Paul Gottfried, an ancap Jew, explicitly talks about how Jews use the left to subvert American politics and how it's impossible to talk about the Frankfurt school with mentioning its Jewish roots.


Yes they fucking are, because egalitarian fantasies require gibs for everyone to pretend they're equal when they very clearly are not.

No they don't, dipshit. Egalitarian libertarianism is simply saying every human has the rights of life, liberty, and the ability to own private property. Quit being an autistic Greekshit who doesn't know anything about politics.

That's called meritocracy, and not at all what most people mean when they say egalitarianism. See picrelated for an example of this in action.

I'm not the gyro, doublenigger. Look at to whom you're replying, it's not difficult and it doesn't take long.

At the moment we're not talking politics at all, but autistically quibbling over semantics. You clearly knew what I meant when I said egalitarianism, so there's no reason for you to get so assblasted over a definition.

Attached: ClipboardImage.png (300x388, 105.62K)

Two sides of the same shekel typical tricks…


Okay then we can discard all their claims as delusional hippie rambling.

Attached: pqafkb6d9ba01.jpg (645x729, 49.39K)

Attached: not an argument.jpg (400x400, 21.52K)

Did you miss the part where right-wing Jews actively call out kikery and subversion in the US? That's more redpilled on the JQ than a lot of whites.

Link it.

And even if true it still doesn't contradict the two-sided shekel position. Controlling all sides on the debate for #NotAllJews points is the oldest kike survival strategy in the book.

Please go back to wherever you crawled from. You aren't welcome on this board.

Literally the embed in this post , to which you were replying. Here's another one if that's not enough for you: hooktube.com/watch?v=gYPAvT-3Fvs
He's made other talks on the matter as well but it seems like they've been taken down from Youtube.


If that's the case, why are Jews disproportionately leftist instead of evenly distributed throughout all political positions?

How exactly is naming the Jew a survival strategy? Why on Earth would someone say "the Frankfurt school and cultural Marxism have undeniable Jewish roots" if one was in league with said Jews?

Your behavior has gone beyond rational suspicion of kikery to the point of irrational spite and paranoia; if a Jew told you drinking water is healthy would you dehydrate yourself based on that alone?

Attached: READ_NIGGA_READ.mp4 (640x480, 465.2K)

I-it's only lavender aroma, goy…

I'd bet you think speed limits are a violation of 'total freedom'

How dumb are you? Ten jews sit in a circle, and a guard watches over them One jew speaks up and cries 'those five jews over there are nepotistic, hate goyim and here's the proof!', and the guard disposes of the accused. Then people would oppose removal of the ones who tattled, because they are playing the good guy.

We blew you the fuck out already in the other thread about this, get over it.

Because that's the actually corrosive and the most proven successful stance against the White goy. If conscienceless muslims were their concern they would go full colonial rightwing like they are in Israel.

It's pretty fucking simple, it guarantees that a portion of the kike population will be viewed as innocents in the inevitable event of kikery backfiring after going overdrive.

If you call being ridiculed and laughed at winning, more power to you. Libshits are truly mentally ill.

I want total freedom to rape your mom but I can't do it because she consented.

Also even "total freedum" is more of an irrelevant abstract than your precious magical "rights". One only has the rights he earns and defends, rights don't sprout from the ground, grow on fucking trees or descend from the sky like manna.

Second this, natural rights are an accepted construct only for mild libertarians/minarchists.

Attached: bother.jpg (400x550, 20.8K)

Why do you sound like a 13 year old redditor? Rights are inherent, get over it, faggot.

Imagine being so dumb that you don't even know what your own political stance is.
Well damn, I had a right to completely bare arms back in 1900 but, huh, where did that go? Oh right, no one defended it. The underage is always the first to jump to calling someone else underage.

Nothing I said indicated that, dipshit.
You rolled over like a little bitch and let people take it from you.

Congratulations, you just defeated your own points and at the same time insulted yourself. Am I being led on here? I refuse to believe someone can legitimately be this stupid.

Prove it.

I doubt that his brain has neurologically matured enough to grasp the irony.

How? You're the one spouting nonsense autistically.