how is it a bad fighter-bomber, spergleave?
Eurofighter
It's from Europe. That's all that needs to be said.
You want a list? I can compile a short one in the morning.
Considering that your idea of a "good" CAS aircraft is a Textron Scorpion and your idea of a "good" tank is a humvee with some chicken wire wrapped around it, I shudder to hear what your idea of a "good" fighter bomber involves.
This isn't 1944, the term is "multirole fighter".
Jesus Christ do these people have any idea how G forces work? There's a good reason why you invert yourself before a dive. Then again its got my other favorite shitty anime troupe in there called AA never does anything and is just there to make characters look cool.
This isn't 1968, the current term is "Joint Strike Fighter".
A lot of stuff is hard to come by cause the US Chairforce is reluctant to release details on these exercises.
The one's I know off the top of my head have got simulated kills against the F-22:
While I am not sure I do believe an F-5 and a MiG-29 got a Simulated kill.
However keep in mind there are kills and there are kills and a lot of times when an F-22 has been shot down it has been because it was fighting in a scenario with it's hands tied behind it's back. That said there are two planes that have been known to beat the F-22 in a proper fight; i.e. a proper scenario with no holds barred and both sides have proper support. That's the
and
In both circumstances it's because to engage said planes the F-22 is heavily pushed outside it's comfort zone. Eurofighter supposedly is able to lock onto and fire a missile off quicker than an F-22 when it opens up. In the E/A-18G case actually not much is known other than the fact the plane's life has been extended beyond the F-22 and they are extremely silent about the capabilities of it's ECM package so speculation as you will. There was also an instance when a regular F/A-18 running passive had an F-22 fly past it so it spun round and cut it in half with guns.
And this is why everyone with a braincell ignores retarded leafs like yourself.
It's Japan. Two nukes wasn't enough.
I kek'd a little.
Still no answer? As expected of a shizo retard.
Simulation fights are not real fights and don't have any ground AA interfering. Also, look at the sortie rate of those planes.
Exactly. Hence the disclaimer I put in and focused more on the scenarios that came remotely close to a real air battle.
Not always, sometimes they do but it is rare. Whenever they do those are the tests to pay attention to.