You only need one gun

Just because you are a poor loser autist doesn't mean the rest of us is.

btw, pay back your debts

for me, its the colt 45

Attached: Singer-m1911-sz.jpg (970x546, 166.42K)

AK-types are solid choice. 7.62x39 just has bad ballistics and power over 300m. RK95 sights can't be even set beyond that. I'd like my rifle scoped most of the time and effective while doing so. I'd take Russia's 5.45x39 AK variant service rifle as a third choice if scope, FN FAL and H&K G3 were off table.

The only thing you need is at least one gun.
Anyway, if I wanted a all in one gun, i'd want a stoner 63 with all the conversion parts.

Shooting at targets at farther than that is a waste of ammo. Even with an AR. The furthest target for army qualification is 300m. I know my AK well, and it's sweet spot is 250m. Any further you loose accuracy. However where I am, that isn't an issue. Either the shitty urban Ohio, or thick sloped mountain woods of Montana. The range is no issue. If I could have found a 74 when I was shopping for an AK I would have gone for that, 5.45 is an ebin round with excellent wounding capability. The only let-down is having to buy the ammo online.

Attached: stalkerwave.webm (700x584 5.44 MB, 133.12K)

t.never owned a gun

For purposes of patrolling/guerrilla operations, yes, I’m only carrying one long gun. So is everyone else with me.

Muh murcan AR-15, o' course

Do you even understand the concept of fun?

FOR ME IT'S THE MCCHICKEN

Attached: Mcchicken_b6c982_6019341.jpg (900x721, 104.83K)