Why don't you love everyone?

Because there are distinctions between people and we have limits for we are human.

then suffer accordingly and you will not be free.
If they are your neighbors you are to love them.
Everyone is your neighbor.

Jesus said you ought to be perfect like your heavenly father. Imperfection is for the unsaved. Get born again.

Things Jesus never said.

Don't be a fool.

Attached: mad dog.png (1241x1238, 3.41M)

Attached: Costanza.jpg (894x894, 368.45K)

lol
go read the story of the good samaritan.

some buddhist teachings are surprisingly useful, regardless of your religion

I never understand the hate toward extremist Muslims. These are people who have fallen down a dark path, much more than we can ever understand.
Much like Europe for hundreds of years was a place of war often in the name of religion, perhaps one day it will change, but the fact is many become fanatical out of legitimate concerns such as American imperialism, make no mistake, the West is guilty of things and creates the problems in the Middle East.
Young men are drawn to extreme ideologies in Islam out of a sense for identity, very similar to young men in the West putting their identity into Alt-right or Antifa.
I feel sorry for these people.

I hate snakes. I understand the nature of snakes. They only do what they do to survive. And I hate them. My hatred isn't born of ignorance of snakes. I know their nature. The impact they have on my life however is such that, I hate them.
I'm Christian now so I must move beyond this hate but there's no way my sentiments are incomprehensible.

You go read it, only the Good Samaritan was a neighbor to that man, not the priest or the levite. Everyone being his neighbor is a direct contradiction of the moral of the story

How do you pray for Stalin?

For his soul if he's in purgatory for some reason.

Love/charity is a movement in direction of the good. Loving a false good is a sin.
It means you have to help people to reach the only true good, which is God. It means converting them.
Then also it means you hate the sin (you hate all false good). And because some are totally in the sin, it's normal to hate the personality they constructed, like maybe to hate a fag, to hate the primer minister of Canada, the president of France,… but it means you still love their souls, by spiritual faith, because of the divine quality a soul have (freedom, immortality, rationality,…). This divine quality can be totally invisible because of the sin, and it's normal to hate the sin, so sometimes to totally hate the appearance a sinner (and a group) have taken because of evil. And so you must wish them to get out of sin/faggotry and to find God, and you can maybe (at least by prayer), help them to it.
This love must be only for the love of Good (God), and the love of the divine souls he putted in us, without seeking any other interest. That's what the saint, I presume, was talking about, the more you love God, the more you love his reflects in the souls of man, and this picture of God we can be is only visible because of the virtues, an unrepentant faggot or a barbarian haven't them, they only can become, by leaving sins, the reflection of God's goodness. So for exemple we must wish jews to convert to Catholicism, niggers to become educated, virtuous and to stop listening to rap, feminist to find a family they can serve,…
For the appearance, we don't have to love the materiality of someone, we aren't in our transfigured bodies.

Also I think the OP is a shill because we all know how the word "love" can be confusing because of the horrible propaganda made against the true love of God in order to pervert it, this propaganda is also made on Zig Forums a lot by people advocating things like theological, moral or political weakness and disguising it as "christian love". Confusing love with laxism, affection, bodily love (eros),…

TL;DR : Don't love the faggot, love his soul, trapped by the sin.

Attached: 1491917400351-2.jpg (222x227, 10.01K)

Just point me to the part where it says
a) to love everyone equally
b) that everyone is your neighbour

I am waiting. You can ask your leftypol friends for advice if you cannot find an answer, but coming here and thinking you can outtheology the centre of the right wing death squads is pretty cocky.

>>>/reddit/
That's a peculiar way of spelling JEWS

There's no Jews in charge of Western countries, name the leaders of the Western countries who are Jews.

The president of France for exemple is an ex-employed of the Rothschild bank, which of course is jewish, and we all know the power isn't in the hand of the chiefs of the administrative regions of Europe but of banks and of the owner of medias. The first ex-employed in Rotschield french president was Pompidou, who opened the logic of the debt. Because it's the subject, Sarkozy (former french president of jewish ancestry) made the war against libya under the councel of (((Bernard Henri levy))). But the most important is the facts the jews are in charge of quasi-all the medias, even some "christian" newspaper like "La croix" (it's the most known) owned by (((Patrick Drahi))) of israelian nationality also. All the french president always show their submission to jews and sionist, legislatively and symbolicaly. The power of the jews is their lobbies, in the finance, the media, in political party also.

Kike.

Who would be considered not a neighbour? Your enemy perhaps? Conveniently, we are called to love our enemy (matthew 5:44 among many others).
If you love one another as Jesus has loved us, surely you would love one another equally.

Pic related

Attached: pWyXCZl.jpg (500x678, 63.62K)

Loving your enemies doesn't mean you can't kill them. Sometimes killing them can be the merciful thing to do.

Explain why, because you seem to be saying that we should kill people without giving them a chance to repent

Just like the thief on the cross, they have the chance to repent as we are killing them.

If the sinner has repented, why are you killing him? Jesus told us to forgive. Matt 18:22. Jesus also told us not to condemn. Luke 6:37. Jesus said he who is without sin may cast the first stone. John 8:7.

A sinner killing other sinners–his neighbors–for their sins is inconsistent with everything Jesus taught.

Come to Jesus, friend.

If God let them die, it's because it's the moment for them to die (you kill them for a good reason right), and in order to them to repent you give them a priest, time, a possibility to have a confession before executing them.
It's not a murder to make justice, like the hebrews made under the mosaic law.

justice, politics, to make an example, don't let crime unpunished, to preserve social order, because even if he repent he can still be attracted by the same sins, because you can't really know if they regret and are not faking… The spiritual moral of God is not the political moral, stop confusing.

You are not God. You are a sinner in no position to condemn others for their sins.

So I should love the man who kidnapped my sister? I should love my sister for being a fool and falling for him? How am I supposed to love my sister who betrayed her family and spat in our faces, who betrayed her God and went to Pisslam? I should love that man's family? Are you for real? I should welcome him with open arms and make him food? I should cater to his every need? Are you kidding me? Sometimes you have to be angry, really angry. Jesus usually got mad, but it was righteous anger. He used this anger to drive out the merchants from the Temple. I understand that He tells us to love, but how am I supposed to love someone who did something so horrible to family? I'm so sick of these threads that say
No.

Attached: 1516984055093.jpg (480x540, 26.77K)

The true leaders of our society are not in government positions, they are the people those 'governing' are dependent upon. If you are an US American your media is dominated by jews, your 'justice' system is dominated by jews, and your 'politicians' are either Israeli dual citizens (which a lot of US americans do not even realize) or in the bag of the powerful jewish lobby.

Yes my kike friend, Israel is an ethnically jewish state and it strives to stay like this. In this sense it is special, because Israel is the only state in the world that is allowed to strive for ethnic homogenity. Something strictly forbidden to the goyim nations. But quod licet iovis non licet bovis, and we are just cattle, am I right?

People that are not in proximity to me. A neighbour is someone that is close to you, that you are (or rather were in prematerialistic times) dutybound to care for. For example if I own an apartment, and one of my family members is in dire need of one lest he became homeless, yet I give away the apartment to some random Mehmet for the good goy points, then I did not fulfill the commandment and am even worse than jews like you.

Death penalty is necessary for justice. If you do not think so yet call yourself christian then you are in for a tough awakening after the story I'm gonna tell you…

We are perfectly able of reason and therefore should make sound judgement. You failed, jew.

It’s a different kind of “love” than the one of this rotten world; not an easy one, but a love which one must learn to understand and put in use.
I was raped a few years ago by my roommate, and he kept making fun of me for that…it took me months, but I learnt to forgive him, to (in a way) love him again, even if I felt often a surge of disgust and fear when he came back into my mind as just memories.

You guys are misled if you think that loving someone means being nice to them or letting them do whatever they want. Sometimes the best way to love someone is to stop them doing evil. Also keep in mind God's love for us. Just as God loves us and is willing to forgive us, he does not refrain from punishing us. Forgiveness and punishment are not mutually exclusive, either for God or for humanity.

First of all there are no women on the internet. Secondly, how exactly did your roommate repent and pay back the damage done to you? Did he face the law and confess all his crimes? If not then why would you be a fool and enable him to continue being a criminal?

I never said I’m a woman; he did not repent, and while I left the room and never saw him again, I forgave him. I don’t know how you feel, but I can empathise and give you my advice: learn to forgive and to love…not the sappy “love” of the world, but the same true love which comes from God in Hos teachings and His sacrifice. Surely we must be like He told us: shrewd as snakes and innocent as doves; which means we can fight back, but at the right time and in the right way, never for retaliation but always out of a desire of love (even when it looks like we are hurting others: Jesus flipped tables and whipped out people too).

I know what I need to know.

The love and forgiveness of God, which requires repentence? I think we are onto something here …

Are you suggesting that we only need to forgive people if they repent of their sin? If so, that seems pretty unorthodox. Is there any evidence from scripture or tradition for that?

Love in this sense is different from emotional love right?

I dont think it's possible to love everyone is it?

Yes?
I could look something up, but in general: God forgives humans but requires repentance (confessing your sins and at least the sacrifice on the cross in your stead). The same applies when you go and confess your sins to a priest, he will order you to commit certain acts to repent. Which for example may include for a rapist to confess his crimes before the police. You will not be able to go to a priest, mention your crimes that you are not sorry for nor willing to right, and then receive legitimate absolution. Since all of the before mentioned is true, what leads you to believe that this should be different between average people?

Orthodoxy is the most unorthodox of things in the church of nice after all.

English is a weird language that does not differentiate between different types of love. The love we are talking about is called caritas (charity) in Latin and completely different from let's say amor or eros. If you are willing the good of another without consideration for your personal gain you can make a good case for love.

Love in the Christian sense is willing the good of the other, it carries some sentimental attachment but that's secondary.
When Jesus says to love your neighbor and love your enemy it means to will what is good for them, to do what is good for them, to pray positively for them.
Ill will is a toxin, a venom that hurts you. This advice is actually for our own good, to purify our hearts.
Sure there are different levels of sinners, some actually hate God and hate his people, but ideally we should love them as well, we should will what is good for them. This doesn't mean being complacent and letting them run amuck…

Not sure why there is so much hostility in this thread against "loving everyone"…God wants all men to be saved and to come to the truth and Jesus died for sinners, not for saints.

You are not God. You don't have the right to punish another sinner.

I disagree. When did Jesus advocate for killing anyone? Jesus told us to forgive Matt 18:22. Jesus commanded us not to condemn. Luke 6:37. Jesus told us to turn the other cheek. Matt 5:38-42. Jesus actively stopped sinners from killing the adulterous woman. John 8.
We even see most countries in the world today still functioning after abolishing the death penalty.

We should make sound judgement, and yet, we don't. even tried to argue killing is acceptable because "you can't really know if they regret and are not faking". Clearly there are limits to our reasoning and judgments.

Yes. Jesus told us to love your enemies, so we should love your enemies.
No. You should love your sister despite that. Jesus loves us despite us being fools, and you should do the same.
With difficulty. Following Jesus isn't easy. After all, anyone can love someone who loves them back, but if you love those who hate you back, then your reward will be great, and you will be children of the Most High
Love your enemies, and do good to those who hate you. It's not complicated. Difficult, yes. It's been said that it is the hardest commandment of Jesus. But it's the second most important part of Christianity, after loving God.
I'm struggling to understand how you managed to find your way to this board while missing the absolute core of the Christian faith - love. It'd be like someone on /islam/ saying that we should be polytheists or someone on /buddhism/ saying that we should try to obtain as much wealth as possible.
If your enemy is hungry, feed him; if he is thirsty, give him something to drink; for by so doing you will heap burning coals on his head. Do not be overcome by evil, but overcome evil with good.
You won't convince anyone about the love of Jesus by hating them.
If you can, why not? If you physically cannot, or could be more productive helping others, that's fair. But if something won't stop you from helping others, there is no (godly) reason not to, unless you are directly helping them do evil.
Let all bitterness and wrath and anger and clamor and slander be put away from you, along with all malice.
But did he harbour hate?
The same way that Jesus loves you despite your sins.
I'm not sure about how much you know about Christianity, but surely you've heard of the Lords Prayer, which says "And forgive us our trespasses, as we forgive those who trespass against us".

Get a bible, and read the four gospels. Reading them in order that they are printed works. Get out a physical pen and paper, and write down any commandments of Jesus as you see them, with no exceptions. Some of them will seem absurd. That's to be expected, as many (perhaps most) teachings of Jesus have been forgotten by the mainstream church. Sometimes they might even be contradictory. Mark them and come back to them later so that you can figure out a way that reconcile them. Ignore any miracles and the like, unless they are done to explain a teaching, because you either already believe in them and there's no point to being distracted, or you don't believe them and there's no point to being distracted by them. Once you're done with the four gospels, move on to the rest of the new testament, and do the same.

If I could love everyone I would be holy af by now. Loving is hard you know.

Attached: jason genova satan shirt.jpg (633x635, 86.43K)

you judge on objective moral and rules, the one who don't respect these (maybe a rapist) have to be punished, but he can still regret and be forgiven by God. That's why you pray for your ennemi before he get killed.
Saints, like Thomas aquinas advocated death penalty, some, in a position of autority even used it (like saint louis), sure it must be used for a good reason and the sinner should always have time to repent. But Jesus told us to let to caesar what belongs to caesar, he clearly made a difference between politics and spiritual, between the justice of man and the justice of God. By killing someone you just kill his body, not his soul (you give him the possibility to repent).

Jesus is part of the Godhead deciding that it is necessary to condemn someone to death for justice.
This is unrelated to death penalty
I'm not even going to adress this meme
Jesus did not advocate that it was wrong to kill this woman. However the law required both her and her lover to be killed. So if the unjust pharisees were to spare the man they should also spare her.
I see a world approaching the abyss incredibly fast. But I also lack your jewish insights.
All we can do is give it our best. We still need to make judgements and often they will be easy (like judging murderers and homos and sentencing them to death)

If you love this man you will advocate for his punishment. If you love your sister you will not just 'forgive' and forget.
Stop being a cuck pls

Attached: 1467832870665.png (654x881, 347.5K)

He endorsed death penalty for heretics, not merely any kind of criminals. Aquinas lived in the medieval ages. Back then, the best solution for stopping someone from spreading his idea to the masses was killing them. In the IT and globalism era nowadays I don't think that's still appropriate because ideas can't die easily.

Attached: low iq.jpg (400x400, 17.5K)

Many crimes were to be punished by death, not all, but among them was heresy. Claiming it was only heresy is wrong. I do not see how the internet and the new world order change that.

Chances are if the term triggers you you are a cuck. If you let your woman whore herself out to other man and do not feel the desire to punish and a deep rage your soul is dead. Then you are a cuck.

Attached: 36895c01e9b6287901021484c6180eff12f235063e4ed690df3fc2b9f454f21a.jpg (680x383, 24.57K)

Attached: tfw low iq.jpg (588x823, 73.95K)

...

I am not rejecting the bible in the least. You are rejecting the bible by advocating policies that will destroy christianity. Making you a spiritual jew.
That's an interesting question that the bible itself answers.
I am not handwaving a single verse away, but I am not going to let someone jew christians by misinterpreting the bible.
Yes? What would happen if following God's law were the right thing to do? Unthinkable.

Attached: 9fc18f7c174203855aff9ddcda2031a25b0dbe440a51d9aef5227f39df3068b2.jpg (390x476, 61.4K)

>>>Zig Forums

You know what else destroys Christianity? Watering it down with whatever non-Christian beliefs you have, turning it into something that the only Christian part left is saying 'lord lord'. It's not just you, it's all of us really. And what is with your obsession with calling everything you don't like Jewish? There's real Jews out there you can call Jewish you know.
And you're not handwaving a single bible verse, true. You're handwaving many of them.
And if killing her was the right thing to do, Jesus would've killed her. Jesus did not kill her. Jesus was without sin. Therefore killing her was not the right thing to do.
And the bible does not say that we (in our time) should murder people (in fact it says that we shouldn't even harbour hate for another person or we will face punishment in the hell of fire) for their own good.

All you need to do is prove that every person is Lawgiver and Judge, and is able to save and destroy. And prove that we are to judge our neighbor.

False. He advocated the principe of the death penalty in order to defend common good.
In the summa contra gentiles he say :
"The fact finally that as long as they live the villains can make amends doesn't impeach that they can be put justly to death, because the risk their life give is bigger and more certain than the good waited from this amend". the translation is from me, sorry for the bad english
Also Saint Louis, was a friend of saint thomas aquinas, and he killed a good bunch of people as a french king.
In fact, people against the principle of the death penalty are making like atheist, viewing the eartly life as the final good of man, but it's not.
The effective efficiency of the death penalty is another political debate depending on circumstances, country,…

It's also been a long time since I read the Summa so I've forgotten the correct translation. But what I understand from that verse is, death penalty is just when waiting for the criminals' amends is risky. It sounds like justifiable homicide more than death row.

No, the point is to distinguish the amends and the punishment, the punishment have value of expiation for thomas aquinas. A condamned can confess (And we hope he does) before confession, but and it doesn't empeach the fact he is still a risk for the society.
Exodus 21, 12-17 :
You shills aren't even able to look one chapter after the "you shall not kill"

I've browsed new advent.
newadvent.org/summa/3064.htm#article2
No, he said that it is good to kill a man when he is harmful like a beast. And what is harmful about a safely locked up criminal?

But Jesus directly referenced Exodus 21 in the mount sermon, and turn the other cheek He said. There's a good commentary on this.

Do you watch CNN a lot? Are you gonna hand out open society leaflets next? The goyim are just becoming wise to the tricks, there is nothing to be done about it.
The right thing to do was to execute both of them as laid out in the law.

Corinthians 1 6,2 and following
Do you not know that the saints will judge the world? And if you are to judge the world, are you not competent to judge trivial cases? Do you not know that we will judge angels? How much more the things of this life!

From your link :
When a legitimate power kill it's to safeguard justice in it's frontier, by making a dissuasive example. It's not the same as the legitimate defense, even if you can make a link. The political powers can legitimately use it. Now the debate on whether or not it's more efficient than perpetual prison or exile is another debate left for the political powers because it's not an universal principle.
But the death penalty constitutes an abomination for a society which does not recognize an expiatory value for the death and for which the eternal life does not exist. Because of the lack of faith of some christians who act like atheist they also see it as an abomination. But the principle of death penalty stands, it doesn't mean I think we must necessarily use it nowadays though.
The point of Exodus is just to expose the use of the "thou shall not kill" against death penalty as invalid.
Because in the spirit of law it's that :
The problem being to kill for anger and passions, not for the good.

TL;DR : The principle of death penalty is valid, all arguments used against it are not, it's a political debate to say if it's usefull or not.

Attached: 86ec84dafc4531e25faa9e69cc92eb1158ce2d1015cb795834035710aed9193b.png (952x1290, 934.44K)

He prayeth best, who loveth best All things both great and small; For the dear God who loveth us, He made and loveth all. - Samuel Taylor Coleridge

Attached: happy gotou.jpg (600x338, 18.37K)

Do not say that you are the temple of the Lord, writes Jeremiah (cf. Jer. 7:4); nor should you say that faith alone in our Lord Jesus Christ can save you, for this is impossible unless you also acquire love for Him through your works.

As for faith by itself, the devils also believe, and tremble (Jas. 2:19).

Four Hundred Texts on Love