Were the WW2 era Resistance groups at all effective or were they just propaganda

Were the WW2 era Resistance groups at all effective or were they just propaganda

Attached: 1524612947139.gif (300x300, 171.75K)

What a shitty OP. This is for you.

Attached: proud_faggot_225_button_100_pack.jpg (150x150, 6.96K)

I fucked your mom

The french one is communist degenerates.

To answer your low-effort shitpost that is vaguely a poor excuse for a question, the Dutch Resistance was a meme and the French Resistance was sabotaged by Vichy and the United States military after they promised to send aid and did not, instead engaging in Operation Market Garden, which was one of the largest and most retarded strategic blunders of the entire war. The frog resistance was legit, the Dutch resistance was mostly fake (entire towns were occupied completely peacefully by Germany), Belgian resistance never happened because Belgians were always cucks. If you want to call Slav civilians who enlisted in their respective nations' armies (or just the Soviet Union's forces) resistance members, then those had varying degrees of success, mostly depending on the ability to feed and arm soldiers or whether or not they were being systematically sent to suicide by the USSR.

TL;DR: Jews and socialists made sure none of them made a big difference, and you're still a faggot.

All resistance is effective. Even a few guys can cause millions in damage and tie up a hundred people in a manhunt to find them.

Did it sway the war? Not really. All resistance in Europe during the war probably harmed Germany less than a few waves of bombers from US and UK.

Attached: ClipboardImage.png (327x619, 249.37K)

How were Jews regarded by the Polish resistance? Modern media depicts them as being the heroes of the resistance but I find it hard to believe that the Poles would be too quick to trust the Jews for the same reason they didn't trust Germans - they were invading.

Attached: 1537377866513.jpg (2000x1007, 1.39M)

They didn't go out of their way to help them and there was distrust of even Polish Jews.
For the most part they didn't give a shit and had bigger problems to worry about.

QFT.

Honestly, if the Third Reich were to magically occupy the USA today then not only would I not resist, I would actively assist them because they would stop the white genocide that our own ZOG is perpetrating on us. Preferably we would have a native government that doesn't try to genocide & democide us, but barring that – yes, please, bring on the occupation even if it means that we stop paying lip service to "muh constitution".

I imagine citizens of occupied countries in Europe might have had a similar perspective.

People call it a sabotage.

...

Why did (((they))) fuck over le resistance? Was it just another case of gross allied incompetence, or did they just not like civilians having guns? irc the French resistance had a hard time because the French government decided to snatch up civvie guns right before Hitler was gearing up to make a forceful mass tourist trip to Paris. Same situation with Britain's Home Guard. Never forget the 6 million family heirlooms we sent to the Brits that they dumped into the sea after the war. Fuck you forever, eternal anglo; of all your crimes this was the worst

Why though?
The Americans that were stationed near me buried most of their kit as it was cheaper to make new gear in the US than to ship it from here to there. There is fuck all left there now lol. Been picked clean over the years.

...

They were all trash and got rightfully massacred by the Germans. Partisans by law have no human rights. Resisting a white Europe should be punished by mass execution.

nod really

"the german nuclear weapons project"
Even if we hadn't stopped it, it wouldn't have amounted to anything. It was, essentially, a huge waste of time for us, a minor inconvinience for them and a lot of people who didn't need to die did. I would reccomend reading about the infiltration of Vemork in Rjukan, it was a very impressive, succsesful and odd operation.

Fun fact, Polish resistance couldn't accomplish absolutely anything in soviet occupied areas because jews kept snitching to the soviets about hideouts, plans, and names of resistance members, also (((Allies))) didn't want to anger stalin so there was no support sent to soviet occupied territories.
Third reich made the mistake of humanely separating jews from innocent civilians and so resistance groups could operate normally.

The Resistance groups of WW2 are a meme created by Allied propaganda, so they could take over European Nations and install puppet regimes under the label of "liberation".
Additionally after the war every country in Europe that worked together with Nazi Germany or remained Neutral in WW2 claimed to have a Resistance Group to hide the shameful fact that they were complete pushovers during the war.
The common resistance member was not some political dissident, but common criminals butthurt that they couldn't run their business anymore with the Nazis in the Country.
These criminals then sold themselves to groups started by Allied Intelligence organizations, usually the British SOE or the Soviet Central Headquarters of the Partisan Movement.
No longer needed many Resistance members were disposed off by the Allied with the end of the war.

I certainly don't doubt it, but I would appreciate a source for that in English.

I have sources in Polish but what exactly do you need so i know what to look for or translate.

I'd appreciate any English sources on Polish Jews snitching to the Soviets about Polish Resistance activities.

Attached: Lillian_Gish_as_Princess_Alexandra.jpg (2392x3130, 1.62M)

It's in Piotr Zychowicz's book "żydzi" (Jews), I'll scan and translate it once i get it back from a friend.

Isn't that quite a bit of work?

I'm not going to translate the whole book, but the chapter you're interested in.

Okay, thanks.

WOW, that's absolutely incredible.

In the meantime
WWII Veteran, Captain Julian Dąbrowski

According to Wehrmacht deserter I met years ago the Dutch and French resistance was mostly a giant honeypot operation run by the Gestapo.

Every Dutchman and his mother brags about how many Jews their ancestors stuffed behind the cupboard or that one family member who was an ebin resistance member.

It wasnt coordinated, it was just at best like you said, "we are going to fight too when they come", or they even thought if they liberate the capital first they'll stop the Russian takeover. The result was mass death and destruction, completely not worth anything, but muh bravery and patriotism.

Every participant should get a "Gullible among the nations" award and everyone responsible for planning that shitshow should be demoted and executed if he's still alive.

Why would jews help germany by hitting the resistance? are you are retarded

If anything can be said, resistance movements during WW2 helped to keep busy some divisions the Germans had when they had none to spare in the later part of the war. They didn't blow up all the dams and bridges and wreck all the railroads and all that, or killed millions of soldiers by shooting them in the back, but they did keep busy men who were needed, desperately, on the front lines.

They didn't change the outcome of the war, but they certainly did make things easier for the Allies/Soviets.

There was some romance in the whole notion of our drunken kinsmen skiing around the mountains with rifles doing Kommando shit. I should set up a biathalon course and get the old wooden skis back in order. I'll have to use my M96 because I can't find an un-Bubba fucked Krag in 6.5mm and it makes me somewhat upset I can't do things just right.

Kikes accused poles of running "deathcamps". Go figure.

Oy vey Polish antisemites were literally holocausting another 6 million jews in a single barn because lazy nazis couldn't intervene fast enough to save them in holiday resorts (^:

Belgian resistance never happened because Belgian were largely pro-Nazis or at the very least indifferent to the war.
There was 3 different fascist party in Belgium and 2 Waffen-SS units (27. SS Grenadier-Division and 28. SS Grenadier-Division… Reminder that Belgium isn't that big).
And despite this the Germans ruled through the regular Belgians "democratic" parties because even them didn't really mind nazi rule…

The post did say "cucks".

Attached: de69cecef5be267ece263fa093a29f089c72489a36836770d09d4fc4c0cb3b62.jpg (500x612, 36.02K)

Belgium is a retarded country. To be honest it's the only country in western Europe that I have no knowledge of its history or how to actually formed, and have no interest in learning. But

Well it's because it doesn't have any…
It was formed by ripping north of France away from France after Napoleon 2.0 Electric Waterloo.
You really thought Britain started it's dissecting of the continent by Germany?

Belgium is what happens when not everyone jumps onto the Protestant train yet everyone fucking hates the French despite half of them speaking it.

The biggest give out for them being cuckolds is how they were so butthurt they didn't sell the license to build guns to us. Like that made of difference? Sorta like how frogs shaved their heads of their prostitues who slept with soldiers **boo hoo hoo*

*a difference

I've always thought that Flanders should go to the Netherlands, and Wallonia to you. But my historical knowledge after the death of Friedrich the Great and before the German-Danish war is just a basic knowledge of your revolution and the bullet points of the Napoleonic wars. So it's always just been that Belgium wasn't there then it was and I never bothered to learn why.
Britain was responsible for Belgium?


Why did Brussels never never bother to force Dutch on Wallonia? Or did they?

As far as I know the Dutch in power and brought forth the revolt spoke French, the German king spoke French and the Walloons never really bothered with the Dutch in the north given everyone spoke French. The problems stem from the majority of the Dutch speakers being literal dirt peasants while anyone who was better off than them were fluent in French, now add the industrial revolution and you can see why shit snowballed into the clusterfuck of modern day Belgium. Its almost like why the Swiss Germans never really forced their lazy german upon the Italians and French in the alps.

That's fucking hilarious, over here random slum "people" butcher women for giving attention to druglords.
Why can't the french do anything right?

Official narrative is that Belgium believed it could keep neutrality.
I think what really happened was they were aware of their impotence but knew they'd get dragged into the war and made a smart diplomatic call by predicting a huge shitshow would ensue and forming a simple strategy.
The strategy was cooperate with whoever occupied them as defending the country would be completely impossible, and when the war is done there's no way they would be blamed. If Germany won they'd be living in the reich, as the allies won they weren't hostilized as the germans clearly needed an occupation force and therefore they weren't in the axis.
Since Belgium would be unable to come out victorious of anything, participating in the war would kill belgians for nothing, and they made the best out of their situation.

Attached: chooseWisely.png (1024x597, 161.27K)

Says the turk mutt

The king got lazy and the subhumans took over. We are seeing the consequences unfolding.

If you want to understand how fucked things are in Europe and how around 500 of constant war was waged you need to look up the Burgundy duchy (which was the cadet line of the kings of France).
The Burgundy duchy was a french duchy that ended due to marriage and coincidence (duke died in battle without a male heir) into the Hapsburg possessions (then even in Spanish possession) and basically the whole goal of French kings was to get it back, which funnily enough was only done during the revolutionary wars.
Dutch are FRANKS the original inhabitants of the "low countries" (pays-bas) are the Frisians which is an ethnic minority even today.
The creation of the Netherlands and Belgian kings (in the 19th century) is just one episode of it.

ahahahhah, okay leaf

Attached: when-you-become-the-most-cucked-western-country-on-the-3576921.png (500x585, 63.15K)

Not completely true, Belgium was part of the Lower Countries, originally part of the Holy Roman Empire of German Nation, populated by Germanic Franks and Frisians.
The Northern Low Countries broke away from the Holy Roman Empire of German Nation and became the Netherlands, when the Protestant Dutch rebelled against the Catholic Spanish, since the Spanish King(from the House of Habsburg) at that time was also the Holy Roman Emperor.
The Southern Low Countries remained with Spain and became the Spanish Netherlands, since the majority of the Population was Catholic.
France then slowly conquered most of the Southern Netherlands during a couple of wars: Franco-Spanish War, War of Devolution, Franco-Dutch War, War of the Reunions, and Nine Years' War.
During the War of the Spanish Succession, the leftovers of the Spanish Netherlands became shortly co ruled by England and the Netherlands and at the end they were given to Austria(became they were also from the house of Habsburg), becoming the Austrian Netherlands.
The Austrian Netherlands then were conquered in 1794 by the armies of Revolutionary France
And after the Alliance kicked Napoleons head in, the South was actually given to the Netherlands. Completely ignoring that the catholic South didn't like the protestant North.
This lead to the Belgian Revolution in 1830 that turned Belgium into its own Nation.

I have no problem with Holland & Belgium becoming German provinces again actually.

After we kick all the niggers, arabs and fags out of course.

This, I fucking hate it that we have been (((conditioned))) by the media to view fucking internationalist Stalin-sucking commies as the epitome of WWII "patriots".

Ah, interesting thanks leaf, I never really thought to compare it to Switzerland.


Yeah I know about that and the border-gore of the era, I'm just not very familiar with the Napoleonic era, for whatever reason.
Well Franks are a Germanic people (though it depends which definition you use) just like the Frisians, but Franks are from Flanders and the Rheinland. When did they move north to replace Frisians? Or did the Frisians just die out? Because in Northern Germany and Jutland they are pretty much only on the North Sea Islands and the Halligen as I understand.


So it was mostly religion that made the Wallons and Flemings create a country?


Besides, Eupen-Malmedy is the only part of Belgium that should go to Germany, and the Netherlands only got a single hill from Germany, besides the current border dispute. In my opinion Wallonia should go to France and Flanders to the Dutch. In a situation where Germany ist nun Erwacht I think that union with Austria and figuring out a way to get back Silesia and Hinterpommen, and Prussia is the first priority rather than a bunch of non-Germans. Pan-Germanicism is retarded for a single nation. I would like to see at the very least 1939 borders with the results of the 16 point peace plan, and Elsaß if not also Lothringen. Then a Pan-Germanic Alliance or union can be made but one country for all Germanic is stupid. But I'm leaf raised so my opinion, for now, means fuck all.


Greek hatred for commies, jews, and turks always impresses me. Cheers
I would think not, but are many Greeks even for the rightful re-capture of Constantinople? Also is that enough or is an Ethnically cleansed Anatolia the goal?

Attached: 1524381320102.jpg (1280x1578, 162.59K)

Where does Kaliningrad fit in this plan?

Despite over 30 years of marxist school teachers, propaganda shows, etc. the majority of Greeks want the Turks to be completely wiped out or at the very least driven back to the middle east.
Unfortunately however, most feel no hatred towards the kikes, and many also think that albanians are alright.
I say fuck 'em. Constantinople will never be enough. I say this again and again every time I post here. Eternal genocide is all that awaits us. We will either all die or commit the greatest massacre the world has ever witnessed. 3 million albanians, 83 million Turks, 2 million skopje slavs and 9 million jews. I won't rest until we kill them all. Execute every man and elder, rape to death every female, hang every child and burn the cities down. Europeans need to stop looking back to their past and worship their ancestors, they need to improve themselves and surpass them.

The concept of 'Greater Greece' always seemed like trash to me. There is nothing great or even remotely impressive about this map. Alexander conquered a lot more than this. It is absolute cuckery to lower our standards to this shit. We should kill our enemies once and for all, and conquer their lands. Half of Eastern Europe and the entire Anatolia will never be enough.

Attached: Greater Greece map.jpg (1054x750, 896.76K)

10/10 would help Grecians genocide Turkroaches but then quickly exit after the work is done because it isn't where I belong ethnically.

Attached: tfw_too_intellgent_for_solar_system.jpg (1589x646, 160.09K)

You don't belong anywhere ethnically, mutt. You are not going to help Greece because you'll just fuck everything up like you mutts always do. What you are going to do is kill yourself.

comfy post

Attached: 1536878904565.jpg (1920x1080, 221.31K)

The Russians have tried to give the damned chunk of clay back multiple times only to be blown off or the CDU going nein.

I know that feel all too well, user.

Attached: Transcarpathia.jpg (890x777, 81.46K)

Königsberg is in Prussia…


That's good to hear, if the Golden dawn isn't pozed I wish you gyros luck, perhaps one day if you're looking for foreign volunteers I'll take the call.


I thought they only tried to give back in exchange for waiver of debts but it was when Germany was still paying out the ass to fix the former DDR's commie infrastructure. Regardless I think they should have taken it even if it's been slavified, but if the government weren't run by cucks re-unification wouldn't have been allowed in the first place.

Bonus: in a debate over integrating the City-State of Berlin into the state of Brandenburg an SPD member suggested naming the potential state Prussia instead of Brandenburg-Berlin. Obliviously that was the first step to nationalism and the fourth reich so it was promptly and rightfully shut down. Please don't take away my passport BND

Molon labe m8. You've got like 32 tanks for that and part of them may even be fully battle-ready.

You got your army equipped by the Americans at the start of the Russian uprising in Novorossiya because your conscripts had to bring in their old Soviet helmets and boots. You are yet to defeat said rebels counting no more than 10 000 soldiers.

And do you think that our army is any better? Although we do have enough matérial to equip the infantry, but that's only because the army is ridiculously undersized. And the artillery and tanks that we have is so little and so obsolete that they are useless in practice.

I fail to find a single reason for you to lick russcuck asses while they see you as both Nazis and "traitors" after 1956. Those are pretty much the worst characteristics they can possibly imagine. That just looks sad.
Ok bro, I got you - there's just a few thousand people in there with no possibility of increasing that number during our attack. Let it be.

Attached: Screenshot.png (753x532, 213.83K)

...

I can't wrap my head around how you think.

Here's a list of facts, lets see which ones trigger you:
- Ukraine was the borderlands of the Russian empire. It did not have its own nationhood.
- Ukraine is naturally much smaller, it had large parts of it added to it for administrative purposes. These parts weren't conquered by Ukrainians, can't be held by Ukrainians, and were given by another power…. which can legally and morally take those parts back whenever they want.
- Ukraine never existed as a country or a nation before (((Bolsheviks))) took power, and they created the "nation" of Ukraine to weaken Russia.
- Kikes added Crimea to Ukraine in the 50s, it was never populated by Ukrainians and they have no cultural ties to it or any claim to it.
- (((Bolsheviks))) starved Ukrainians to death, Russians had nothing to do with it, and were also victims.
- When (((Bolsheviksm))) failed, Ukraine sold all state secrets to CIA for food aid.
- CIA orchestrated Orange Revolution against the will of the people, and instituted a foreign puppet government.
- This government hilariously collapsed and was replaced with a Russian puppet government.
- The Russian puppet government was deposed in a coup, and replaced with an EU puppet government.
- The EU puppet government threatened to genocide Russians, so they're fully in their rights to rebel. Nobody cares if Russians are supporting them or getting involved with fucking tanks.
- Russian rebels shot down the Malaysian airplane, because they didn't have IFF radar. However Ukraine is to blame because it can't even tell foreign airplanes to go around, and instead takes bribes to let them through.


-

Attached: mind-blown-jackie-chan-720x340-175x175.jpg (175x175, 10.43K)

Oh look, Ukraine is shrieking about invisible Russian tank battalions again for more USD. You faggots really are the Israel of Europe, you know that?

Attached: Envious Ukies.png (542x432, 247.27K)

ok

I wonder who is behind this post.

>(((Bolsheviks))) starved Ukrainians to death
so either, you think bolsheviks were in charge of the soviets, or you think bolsheviks did it separate of the soviets and the soviets are not at fault. the second of which is the standpoint that communists who deny the holodomor take. go suck your tranny bo's cock

Hard to grasp any coherent statement in this shitposting, which is no wonder considering the flags.

Fellow ayyy, on this planet facts are typically based on something while there's only two actual facts in your pile of russcuck propaganda (8 and 11 if we ignore "rebels" nonsense from the latter). I promise to let you make that UFO circles thingie on my field if you can provide an actual evidence for a single "fact" besides of number 8 and 11. A single one because polemics on all this bullshit would take days. Go ahead, don't be shy. I personally hope you'll choose the Orange Revolution one because this is by far the funniest, but I'm totally ok if your alien balls are too tiny for such move.
Polite sage for offtopic.

Attached: Thank God For Suicide.png (916x975, 998.7K)

You will witness in your life time the collapse of NATO/EU, the partitioning of the Ukraine, the balkanization of North America and everything else fun and wonderful.

Then when the Russians don't want to pay for it they utterly obliterate your army and just take everything then parade around with it.

Attached: 1463649228913.jpg (445x827, 59.93K)

Stop! My penis is getting too erect.

Where you at, leafanon? Assuming you're in the region, want to help create the Great Lakes Confederacy?

Greetings from Cascadia!

Your post literally gave me cancer. I'm gonna die soon, so please be kind and start another emu war to give me a last chuckle.

...

Sorry m8, prairiefag here, I think B.C., Washington, North bit of Idaho, Saskatchewan, and Montana would be good, I would say Manitoba too but that’s getting too big, even though their population is only like 1.3 million. Once Vancouver is purged of Pajeets, Chinks and libcucks (so depopulated) it and Seattle would be the prime ports, And we’d have lots of oil, beef, grains, and forestry. I’ll make a map when I get home from school for clarification (and LARPing purposes)


Unless they cuck us out of Pacific access.


Every week I find I new reason to hate Britian, thanks anglos.

We were also going to annex the entire west coast but ended up giving the land to the US because we were worried they would join our enemy in the next big European war.

Fucking fantastic alt-history. The Independent Republics of North America form an alliance to invade the British controlled Western Coastal Territory on behalf of Imperial Germany.

The US stopped giving aid to the Resistance groups because they were fighting each other, and they didn't want a communist revolution in France.

Amazing.

The Shipyards in Vancouver and the Boeing facilities in Seattle are top priority in terms of needing to be captured. They need to be intact lest you get a Donbass situation where they can't get shit running due to the Ukrainians dropping everything they got on them. You'd need to go as a far down as the Klamath River/Southern end of the Cascades to keep the mexicans from coming in easily and you'd need to go as far east as the Montana-North Dakota border.


If I recall the Crimean war set you with a ridiculous amount of debt not to mention the public didn't want to get into another war with a shit outcome and even more debt. Also you gave a good chunk of that Oregon territory up due to the fact uncle sam would have taken it from you without much of a fight.

Really? What would it take to make Mexico a credible threat?

Please rate my map.

Attached: 113169847792965352858199058902842408330 mine.png (4972x2517, 1004.55K)

Central Africa just needs to be one large disorganized territory. The only thing holding together any semblance of borders there right now is international treaty. World order shifts of this magnitude would leave Africa on it's own. We'd see the North African nations probably stay viable, maybe South Africa, but that whole central region will be a borderless, lawless clusterfuck.

If the US Balkanized it wouldn't be divided up into larger state sized areas it would urban areas in total chaos, places surrounding military bases under federal control, and large amounts of rural America with noone really in control

Way too large parts of land taken up by a single authority.

Attached: map.png (1094x678, 130.92K)

This from a tabletop game or something? Whatever it is I feel like I would want more of it.

It's alt history lad, maybe they kept Texas due to the lack of Manifest Destiny and became a massively oil rich country.

As usual, depends on logistics. The ones supported from outside caused more serious damage when they had an opportunity, others mostly just occasionally assassinated either the most odious invader they could reach or (more often) whoever was the most available.
Either way, the main damage is not direct, it's a threat sticking more costs of opportunity on the enemy who needs more resources elsewhere. As in, troops diverted to patrol irrelevant backyards and guard railways are not used as reinforcements in the actual war, so it's about "you keep more of them tied here and see how well their front does out there".


Of course, but it's more of "a schizophrenic dude with Napoleon complex orders his men to go throw some sticks at wasp nests, they comply, it ends in much pain".
In that Balkans for centuries were a hellhole nobody in right mind would walk in and expect it to end well, so it's more that messing with them was "asking for it", than they were particularly adept or had a huge hate-on for this particular invader.

fat/5

Attached: 1537836874828-0.png (996x832, 164.59K)

don't-ever-again-try-to-make-these-kind-of-maps/10

Attached: machi.png (806x785, 224.43K)

fixed

Attached: 113169847792965352858199058902842408330_mine.png (4972x2517, 721.02K)

its trash too im sorry

Attached: 5ac86119442d5a795b77aa7c4ff68db58f4d8bb155cd5376aad4b19c5b6d069c.jpg (800x682, 76.8K)