5-6 round capacity

I like it when revolvers do the low barrel position. Why has this not become widespread historically? Cost of metal?

Because it's largely pointless.
Function > fashion.

Is the trigger mechanism any more complicated than a conventional revolver? I've never seen one taken apart before.
Aside from that, probably 'market forces' (i.e. cheap and lazy) and cultural momentum. It's superior, but not by enough of a margin to change from the design that everyone's already familiar with.

A lower bore axis is pointless?

They are more mechanically complex - they have an internal hammer that is cocked by that "external" one. They are also bulky, existing models even more so with that steel brick above the barrel and so are almost exclusively range toys.

but what if there's a bear

Attached: 69.jpg (650x400, 69.42K)

You ruined Counter-Strike, faggot.

That's the Rhino, exclusively.

Play better games,
FAGGOT.

Skip to 2:30, they speak in pastalang, but you get to see the internal components.

Oh look, it's this thread again.

So, do you think that the handgun in question should be in 9x19 or .45 ACP?