Russia sends 2 nuclear-capable bombers to Venezuela
Just start something already. I'm tired of either experimenting with weapons or reading posts on Zig Forums.
It's a duty of one failed communist regime to support another, especially before another fuck up. How big of a thing is such a plane and wasn't some kind of similar shit pulled off with Cuba?
Isn't pretty much any aircraft with a bomb bay or hard point 'nuclear-capable'?
Boy howdy are you a perfect example of how not to make a thread. Please leave.
Here, an archive
archive.is
nothing is ever going to happen unless Israel gets to profit from it
Pretty much. No reason to keep the big planes around otherwise. Carpet bombing is kind of frowned upon at this point.
Carpet bombing is a complete waste of time and money. It was used at the time because you had to basically eyeball your aim, so accuracy was absolute dogshit and the only way to hit anything was to drop 100 tons of bombs in its vicinity hoping that a few of them will actually hit the target.
Only correct if you were to suggest the usage of chemical weapons instead
Not if you want to kill civilians, and I don't know why you wouldn't.
So Russia dumped some of its old strategic bombers (that are of very little use to it) on a country that can't even afford the cost of letting them rust on an airstrip.
YES YES YES
THE KUBE DESIRES NOTHING MORE THAN HONOR, RAPE AND SLAUGHTER
FORWARDS TO BLOOD MASSACRE, Zig ForumsOMRADES
But Hellenon, napalm IS a chemical weapon.
Uh does this guy not know how real life money works?
you do understand that countries can stop printing money right
Fuck off, faggot
Printing money is not how money is made.
Example: you go to a bank and take out a loan. The bank, instead of giving you money they has sitting around, takes a loan from the central bank. The central bank creates money out of thin air to give to the bank. They only have to pay back the key interest rate. Currently in the EU the key interest rate is 0%.
This is how money is made. The central bank creates money out of thin air to give out to bank.
Hey guise… listen… what if we made bullets out of chemicals?!
my point is that countries have methods of reducing inflation, even if they're partially counteracted by other means
Gun related deaths are just lead poisoning, prove me wrong.
Propellant propelled projectile penetration
Listen, I fired the gun, and the bullet left the barrel. What happens after that isn't my responsibility. I just wanted to fire a bullet. It is not my fault that it kept going.
Guns don't kill, bullets do.
Very nice. Makes me hard
It's a hole overdose leading to acute blood insufficiency.
...
Sounds like Russia is being retarded since almost all of the Americas (with the exception of shitty commie countries like Cuba and Bolivia) all have had enough of Maduro, who is probably the worst world leader today
Muh Russia shit up mutt you ruined the world not them
only retarded people have a hate boner about America, especially for them shitting all over Maduro. Stay butthurt
You do understand that fake-spain is not in any position to be pointing fingers at the US, right?
That's not the real mexico that's the one in the United States real mexico is European
Man I'm just shitposting what did I say before the bo woke up?
Oh also mutt
Aren't most modern weapons chemical, outside of firearms?
Spaghetti nigger trying to copy my flag get the fuck out you mutt on a VPN
The absolute IQ of CTR. You're not even worth the mass grave.
Why would firearms be excluded from that?
Thinking I'm not just an edgy redditor
Suits you dumb mutt
Maybe because with chemical weapons its exactly the chemical compound that is doing the killing, unlike with firearms where you have the gunpowder as an indirect factor?
Just let it happen eight chin is a Reddit now give up BO
Then that also includes everything that uses kinetic energy to kill. Explosives work by initiating a rapid expansion of gas or acceleration of material, it's not the fuel nor the oxidizer the ones that kill. Given how much explosives we use in warfare, I wouldn't say that most weapons are chemical.
Bullets are made out of chemicals. A firearm is a lump of chemicals that uses chemicals to push other chemicals into whatever chemicals you happen to be pointing it towards at the time. All matter is chemicals. All weapons are chemical weapons.
Now that you put it that way, you're right…
I thought Central banks borrow the money at interest from private institutions or is that just the Fed?
A bullet does not cause any meaningful chemical action on the target. Even if the energy input caused some kind of biochemical change in the flesh, it is still triggered by purely mechanical means rather than the lead reacting chemically.
You might as well ask, why don't nukes count as chem? Isn't fission part of chemistry? There's two ways to interpret the word "chemical". One is useful and commonplace among actual chemists and other scientists. The other is absolutely nonsense and often chosen by stupid people.