Why is fornication a sin...

Are you functionally illiterate or just b8ing? I hope for you it's the latter.

Hebdidn't say that. He just asked what version it is.

Sex is rightly ordered to its unitive and procreative purposes. The proper place for procreation is in a family. Easy.

Not to be that guy, but nowadays there is a huge divorce industry going on.

It has become profitable for many THOTs to make tactical fast marriages and get handsomely rewarded in cash after divorce.

If divorce was forbbiden I would agree with every anti-fornication post ITT. But we don't live in such a time.

But with divorce industry going on delaying and being very reluctant about marriage saves your family assets.

Because you're not in an actual committed relationship under God. It's easy to jump from relationship to relationship having sex. Sex was created by God for procreation and the ultimate act of love. Sex without a marriage bond cheapens the relationship to something animalistic. It doesn't last and prevents love from developing.

So commit already instead of having the benefits of marriage without the hard part!

You wanna know why? Here's why. Because consequence free sex necessarily leads to consequences. Because biking in Europe and making money is no exchange for raising a child. Pray for this woman.

Only because the men they married were spineless enough to let them walk all over them, or aggravated their spouses to wanting nothing to do with them (and honestly there is no shortage of this today). And yes, I know that we can extrapolate the causes this whole issue from the man and women themselves, their families, friends to society, but as much of a patriarchalist as I am, if a marriage fails, it's probably the man's fault for being weak and refusing to take control, or being ecessively zealous about it (which is in turn just another form of weakness). If you are a married man and don't look to St Joseph as your guide and inspiration in the married state, then forget it.

This is a defeatist attitude. "Once upon a time" is not a legitimate defence, and it's the same one used by any lukewarm sort when confronted with a controversial topic.

I thought it would have a pro-life ending, but she shows absolutely no remorse. Even wanted to look at the bloodied aborted fetus when it was taken out and dumped in a bag. Amazing.

Look at what Thomas Aquinas wrotr back in the middle ages. That should at least give you an outline of an argument.

dhspriory.org/thomas/ContraGentiles3b.htm#122

and if those two don't end up being married the partner they were sleeping with will be listed as a premarital sexual partner.

Those graphs are definitely still relevant, whether you originally saw them that way or not.