Celibacy Revolution

Lol those are incels and pretend volcels. These people are the most disgusting people youd encounter when it comes to vices.

t. Wizard apprentice

America
It's taken off the Census and the ACS.
Look over his tweets.
He explains the methodology and sources from time-to-time.

Pretty much, we've gone full circle.

Estimated vs reported.

Or are we witnessing the affects of liberalism allowing women to be promiscuous and always choose from the top 0.1% of men while the rest of us are stuck here putting up a facade and calling it celibacy.

Yep. With women becoming whores we can't have kids or kids with proper father figures, which gives great advantage to competing nations, and gives Islam a fertility edge over the West.

< monasticism-on-hold
Men are just hooking-up less.
It's not chads/incels. Instead … Welcome to the Hikikomori generation.

nationalgeographic.com/photography/proof/2018/february/japan-hikikomori-isolation-society/
nippon.com/en/currents/d00332/

Yeeah…no

Attached: Screenshot_4.png (641x633, 63.98K)

Because sex is part of a reproduction ritual. It's innate for males to instinctively seek a woman to settle among his flings.

If whoredom is so rampant, and male can only have flings, this kills one of the biggest motivations for male to seek sex with females.

Except the same sexlessness affects japanese women.
A large part of the origin of the phenomenon in Japan, and increasingly in the West, is an absolutely toxic working society and rising costs of living, and people interacting less in general, which is absolutely poisonous for marriage and raising kids.

I'm not defending the Sexual Revolution, but people placing the blame on women only, out of bitterness, are just as retarded.

There are massive societal changes involved, as well.

This is not about "blame" on the moral sense. It's about cause and effect.

If my car is not working well because of a certain piece, I have to acknowledge that the mentioned piece has a problem.

If I just say the problem is generalized to the whole car and not focus in any piece in particular as to not hurt the screwdriver feelings, I can do that, but the price the mechanic will ask me will be so much higher.

This kind of stuff is important to notice. The current wave of degeneracy is the ripening of things that happened on their watch. Things are bound to get strange by comparison once their cultural deathgrip on our society is broken, and we can finally start undoing the damage.

Yep. Only when it's generalized for promiscuous women to be in their 40s-50s without any family bonds, or respectful relationships with opposite sex outside work, will the feminist "have sex with everyone in sight" will be start to be questioned.

We have to wait until this system exausts itself. Ride the Tiger, rather than fighting it.

And if your car is a aging rustbucket, and you focus on the radiator only, your car is gonna crap out under you regardless.

Stop acting like a reactionary version of those crazy SJW that think everything wrong with society is due to the Patriarchy, or rape culture, or white people or whatever.

I mean, did you even read the articles?
Those guys were clinical shut-ins, born of a winnie the poohed up japanese work society(and it's not even the first time such movements have arisen in Japan, though it's never been as ).
Trying to tie them in your narrative makes no sense.

Once people started interacting with them, they became somewhat normal again, and one guy even married the girl that came to reintegrate him into society, and went on to help other hikos get back on track, as well.

Well you used the terms "aging rustbucket", so you already agree that this is a system that is depleting itself naturally.

Self-removing problem. The problem is it takes a long cycle.

Seeing the blame on females has nothing to do with sexist, but rather Equity. What do I mean with this?

Males are already blamed for everything, in pop culture, articles, misoginy, blamed for war, genocides, and all ilnesses, and they just endure it.

Females at the slighest accusation start to flip and start whining it's unfair.
No it's not unfair. Given the terrain, analysing the problems in femalesphere for what they are is not sexist, but rather holistic.

Christianity has always had a form of spiritual judo at its core. After all, we've seen how many empires into their graves at this point? As far as I'm concerned this nonsense is just all the more reason to stick to the women within the faith. Exogamy pollutes the Sacrament of Matrimony anyhow.

At the risk of sounding like a redditor, "This".
And remember men, she doesn't have to be a supermodel. She just has to be a real Christian.

So "im gonna go full retard in the opposite direction out of butthurt"
Got it.

Does not mean anything, it means more incels and hikki and neets. Also an old saying. Men lie about not being a virgin, women lies about being one.

What do you expect me to do, wife up a whore?
Maybe, just maybe, men are having less sex because they're tired of this promiscuous bullshit that's CURRENT YEAR and therefore are opting out of society.

These exist indeed, but do not show up on statistics because they're so rare and probably seldom picked out of a random population.
What this means is that if multiple statistics say that there are 0% virgin women in the 22-25 category, the actual existing virgins between ages 22-25 are statistically insignificant.
In short, they have become anomalies that will mess up your statistics rather than make them accurate for a general population.

It should nonetheless generate some percentages, or atleast a blip on the graph.

But the whole thing is pointless.
Lyman said it was a math error, and the actual graph is the one i shared but people seem to ignore that stuff, being too busy circlerjerking themselves over "womynfolk are whores" posts, so why do i even bother?

Attached: Screenshot_5.png (606x133, 15.93K)

It isn't voluntary. Besides, most men throughout history didn't even reproduce, while 80% of women did. Simple as that.

That's the whole thing, if they were significant enough to appear in statistics and thus at least show a blip there would actually be something.
0% in statistics mostly means insignificant amounts of a data.
This was my entire point, non-CURRENT YEAR women are so few and rare they have become statistical anomalies.

How do we fix women, Christanons?

Attached: decadence.png (1200x714, 1.25M)

By fixing men.

Because women have no agency and it is up to men to control every aspect of their behavior.

It's the responsibility of the man to lead.

By fixing yourself.

You're right about that atleast. We are witnessing the end of the social agreement between roasties and betas which entailed that the beta provided resources in return for access to sex with a female. This was the basis for the institution of marriage throughout history: The betas toiled, and with their resources, they compensated for their lack of sexual appeal, and made themselves attractive to the roastbeef that they wanted to mate with. It's important to note how absolutely essential this pact is to functioning society. It's why we're so wealthy in the 21th century. But the roasties have had enough. In the age of feminism, sound wisdom and common sense no longer have any effect on the weaker sex. They want Chad, and noone but Chad. After all, he makes their nether regions tingle. In the modern welfare states, a paradigm shift has occurred. They can now substitute the hardworking betas for daddy government and get the resources without having to stomach needing to associate with, and pretend to love, the unfortunate betas. On their end, the betas are waking up to the fact that their position in society has become miserable. They've always been the work-horses, but they used to get something in return. In the past, if they were successful, they could expect a reasonably chaste virgin girl to marry. Not anymore. Now they get berated by misandrist feminists who want them to apologize for their existence. And because of this, betas are now checking out of society and going their own way in massive numbers. They've sized up the work/benefit ratio of a normie life and come to the conclusion that 2D waifus and video games is the better option. Of course, this is a total disaster for the West.

Attached: 1525445013401.png (1440x1834, 769.55K)

Kek, people are insane these days. Was there ever a sane time?

I know you're being sarcastic, but let's not pretend it isn't true.

After the fall?

Attached: 833540eaffc1a1de95c4af3e1aa10a342b9b3f5bfaebe05f98134c2b1a64e574.png (641x641, 407.23K)

Surely you mean before the fall. After the Fall we have Cain having God Himself telling him to not murder his brother and he goes and does it anyway.

in meme form

Attached: ST_AnthonyTheGreat.png (500x781, 235.98K)

Why does the female line in the first graph decline so much compared to the male line? Was the dip due to divorced men marrying previously unmarried women?

I'm going to be that guy and say you're not thinking outside of your circle. 2D Waifus and video games isn't a thing amongst those groups and well, Japan. Think of pornography and IG thots. That's what men are getting hooked on.

Shit, video games is a common recreational activity but it isn't what they're only doing. There's a section that's just shitposting on social medias like Twitter and Facebook or eating junk food all day doing nothing.

Usually bizarre behavior like that in these kinds of datasets are due to irregularities in how the data is collected rather than a change in what's being observed.

They aren't broken. They are as they have always been.
We need to fix our laws back to when women had the rights of children. No work and under a legal guardian. Because they are children mentally.
They mentally can't handle the stress and responsibility of a full legal and work life, it is actually a horrible thing to do this, again, much like it is to children.
No one defends child labor as a good welfare law, so we shouldn't defend woman labor.

Gee I wonder what happened in the forties that lead to a lowering of the mean marriage age

I live in Japan and the average working day at my office is 14-18 hours a day 5 days/week (for an officially 40 hours/week job). If you want a real job in Japan you have to be willing to give up your entire life for it. If you want any free time at all you have to take a job that doesn't pay enough to actually survive on. The cost of living here is high. You can't survive on your own off a minimum wage or parttime job. That's why people give up and live off their parents. The choice is either work 60-80 hours/week or be a neet with no real option in between.

Peer, o mere mortal, into western society's future
being this

>>>/mgtow/

Yeah, it's pretty sad. It's annoying how everyone likes to ignore facts to pat each other on the back about how correct they are and how wrong everybody else is. The Posts that directly follow your are a good example.

Even if they were single digits, or fractions of a percent, they would appear.
And as i said, they do appear, but you WILLFULLY CHOOSE TO IGNORE THE REAL DATA.
Look at the corrected graph.
They are 8-9% of the female population.
Men are a few percentages higher, as has always been the case for these types of statistics, from sex to reproduction, for as has long as we have collected this data.

But as i said, you faggots willfully ignore the real data, and cling to bugged-up graphs even the author has deleted from this tweet timeline, and word-of-mouth urban myths like
, because it feeds your narrative.

bestest timeline

Attached: 972178ecae380f9fecd02b02cb200e60044a4e17f22ffb124ee0326f823570f1.png (594x268, 41.07K)

In the same way that the Soviet Famines in the Ukraine ushered in a golden age of temperance and defeat of gluttony

That's the whole point, 1/1000 or 1/10000 would not appear on a graph.

I know they exist, but their appearance is statistically insignificant.
That's the whole shocker.

What's the difference between the two graphs in terms of population?
I mean why was the first one deleted?

Are you in Tokyo?

0,0something% of anything is too low a number for ANYTHING in a population, beyond weird genetic stuff.
Its 8-9%.
If that percentage was an ethnic minority with a political party in a country, itd be used as a political kingmaker.
Its literally the same population, you dumbass.
Weird calculation error, and the author prefered not keeping a wrong graph on the internet, to be mistakenly sourced.

I don't see how your post proves anything. This "Lyman Stone" fellow provides no evidence of any kind to back up what he says, meanwhile, statistically, single motherhood rates and divorce rates have been on the rise continuously for some decades now.

This is true. Women are influenced by men. We cannot run away from our duty to the Lord by claiming that women ruined the world when we ourselves ruined it.

Genesis 3:11-12
And He said, “Who told you that you were naked? Have you eaten from the tree of which I commanded you not to eat?” The man said, “The woman whom You gave to be with me, she gave me from the tree, and I ate.”

this is you spot the "christian" feminist

Those points seeing women as an acephalous animal without accountability, or even less accountability that a child has of its parents, simply to escape guilt;

Is on the level of being sold snakeoil.
No thanks. Bible is very clear on guilt of women even in -Original Sin- and you guys say that women dindu nothing.

Just don't come misquoting the Bible in such a Luciferian way

PS - quoting Bible to illibate women of -Original Sin- is a new level of White Knighting. This is you spot "Christians", who deny Original Sin if only to "please women".

Removing Dogma because it hurts women's feelings? Really?

To all the incels that think they can never find a woman to love them:

Have you ever met a woman? The most intelligent woman I ever met, IQ over 140, completely abandoned all her beliefs and agreed completely with some random dumbass because she fancied him. I doubt the dumbest man in the world wouldn't abandon his beliefs because some woman he fancied disagreed.

They have no real spine or conviction in their beliefs, read the Bible sometime.

>>>Zig Forums

Nice projection. He didn't say anything but one line. What's with you people thinking everyone is either against you or completely on your side? You people need help

The real autism is thinking everyone online is your same sex and looks like you. Seriously it's funny. Then assumptions are made about your character that couldn't be further from the truth when you do reveal a tidbit of your identity even on Social media.

...

Yep, close enough.

Those loins are going to stay girded for an awfully long time. 😂

It's due to paganist modern society and female hypergamy.

You realise there's a word(in french, iirc) for precisely that?
Pick up a saint calendar sometimes.
Yeah, just limiting ourselves to the NT, we have the Myrrhbearers, that visited the tomb, while the Apostles were scared.
Kandake, that was visited by Philip, and would help evangelize Ethiopia.
Dorcas(Tabitha), that was an important pillar of the community.
Claudia, mentioned by Paul.
The enduring faith of old Lois, and her daughter Eunice.
Lydia of Thyatira, the first european convert.
Julia and Nereus's sister.
Persis - a "woman who has worked hard in the Lord"
Priscilla, the wife of Aquila, mentioned in numerous tracts.
"Joanna the wife of Chuza Herod's steward, and Susanna, and many others, which ministered unto Him of their substance."
etc.

And that's not even getting into the women of the post-biblical early church, which had a huge part, and deserve a chapter of their own.

Or do you wanna call all of these gals spineless whores, as well?

Attached: st-nino.jpg (297x478 11.87 KB, 109.67K)

Lmao found the anime watching faggot
protip: men are leaders and should take the lead. If women are morally corrupt, it's because "men" like you allow it

That's been a thing since women were women.

I don't know if it's also the case in Japan, but usually living in the countryside is much, much cheaper. Have you considered moving?

This. Men in western society have no grip over their women

I live in a city in Saitama Prefecture, which is what the Japanese consider hillbilly country. It's still close to Tokyo by train, though. The problem with the cost of living in Japan isn't so much location, since rents and mortgages even in Tokyo are dirt cheap (maybe 30% of my home country's), but rather fees, bills, insurance, taxes, food (besides rice lol), and transportation. Living in a city here is probably cheaper than living in the countryside in those terms, even if the rent is a bit higher here, mostly because you don't need to maintain a car in the city. Anyway, life here is within my budget as long as I don't have to move every year, but I'm worked like a dog.

So what are you suggesting, let's go out and just bust into nightclubs and break knees of every girl there? Or when they have a one night stand, track them down and make them chew the curb?
They're free and if they choose to act like they do, I respect it more than manipulating a woman into servitude and living in a charade. I honestly can't understand how can you respect a woman whom you manipulate. If a woman, on her own accord, can't conclude sex and alcohol are bad, what in the hell would you want to have anything to do with her?
You think women didn't go for romps in the hay? They did the same exact shit as women today, it's just that they did it in secret.

I'm not suggesting that. It starts with your fathers There needs to be a shame mechanism and at least a PROJECTION of a monogamous household. These are instilled values that carry over child forever. You think kids with single moms or dads or moms that look like they are cucked, or cuck, make kids who behave better? There was one for me. That's why I only had sex with one man and that's my husband.

That's all well and good, but women are hivemind prone. When they go to college and get into a girl posse, dad is very far away.

again, only if they're retarded. most people are retarded. big whopus. stop putting your faith in people. have loyalty to yourself, your loved ones, and god only

You aren't dealing with Tyranids here, user.

Attached: ermsy_darePATCH_grande.jpg (600x600, 82.83K)

The first step in leadership is to delegate responsability to your subordinates.

If your subordinates are not held accountable for their actions, they cannot grow as people.

Therefore, anyone who ilibates women of all responsability, (including illibation from Original Sin! quite the ((christians)) here), is a failure in leadership.

The General holds the Colonel and the Major accountable.
The Colonel doesn't just go "I dindu nuffin the leader is the General" after a screwup.

All this "women dindu nuffin" is self evident that there is quite a big amount of guilt requiring penitance.

It starts in ths family. Men dont care their sisters and daughters go to clubs and get railed constantly. Men go out and do that with girls and normamise that behaviour. Some of your problems are your own fault, you cant go around blaming others forever.

Ben Sira, which might be the most heavy in judging women says you're selling snake oil.

-Everyone- inherits Original Sin. If women have no accountability, that means they don't have responsability for Original Sin, while Males get the Double the blame for the Fall. Which would mean non-sense.

Never understimate the Women. The Woman acts in the shadows, and has quite a lot of subterfuge power. They are cunning.
Just because Male is the leader, does not the Woman is morally acephalous. Just because one is the General, does not mean the Brigadier is mentally incapable.

There is a lot of sin and penitence that need to be done.
No one wants to marry a whore. The only exceptions are the assumed whores, who acknowledge their fallen nature and one day end up marrying a lonely billionaire. But even in such cases, the literal prostitute admits her sinful path and mistakes, so why can't a normal woman?

Both a Goon and someone Biblically illiterate. You sure told me.

This is terrible. I have two kids and a happy marriage. How are my children suppose to find functional, healthy spouses when they grow up? People are becoming so isolated from each other it's frightening. Technology and specifically social media is ruining us. Or rather, leftist indoctrination loads the gun and social media pulls the trigger.

You the married man, as the leader, believe that woman are dumb people uncapable of moral judgement?

Because this is the meme that is being shilled lately.

That is literally what Muslims believe. Christianity differentiation of the sexes is correct, but forcing people to be moral goes against Free Will and is what Muslims do.

The latter is true, but the former is merely an effect of the latter. Women are biologically attracted to only 5-20% of men- this is regardless of what the other 80% of men do with themselves, because the women perceive them as being of low genetic quality and thus as being unworthy of procreation. In the past, this was not a problem, as our society functioned well with traditional marriage and patriarchal institutions. But nowadays there is feminism and women are permitted to ride the Chad cock carousel with no repercussions aside from realizing that they're going to die alone when they're 35-40, and by then, it's too late.

The solution, of course, is Islam-style forced marriage of lolis, wifebeating, strict dress code, and stonings for the worst offenders.

I don't get, is being that a bad thing?

Have you considered encouraging them to marry a Christian? Don't underestimate your ability to influence them, particularly if you've been a good father. Also why would you let them use social media? There's literally no benefit to doing so, it's just a vice.

If you want to argue biology then slags not reproducing means that there won't be slags in a couple generations. Same with homosexuals now that there's no pressure for them to marry.

Genes only represent trends not absolutes.
I'm sorry for your brain damage.

Is your spirit animal a panda, or something?

No, you really didn't get it. I was just asking what opinion do you have on your wife, do you consider her:
1) your partner capable of moral judgement
2) a dumb person uncapable of moral judgement

Which is a rethorical question of course, made to show the point to people who say that Women are not mentally capable of being morally accountable and in their conclusion all the blame is exclusively on the males.

I was not attacking you.

Regardless slags not reproducing will have an
effect even if not absolute, that people who value sex for reproduction will end up better represented on gene pool.

Hrm… who do I trust, the random shitposter on the internet or the more than a decade I've spent studying at the graduate level the heritability of behavior and self control…

The heritability of life outcome stands at about 87% in human populations. Among the remaining 13% there are about 6% that will escalate in their degeneracy and inevitably require constant state intervention until they expire, and 7% who will build all the nice things that our descendants will take for granted as inherent to a functional society.

All women have a natural inclination to be slags, it's only through the influence of powerful men that they become adequately tame.