Wipes out your type 99 tank column with Jdam equipped mark 84's

Heh, nothin' personal commie chink.

Attached: F-15E_Strike_Eagle-01.jpg (402x523, 46.13K)

Other urls found in this thread:

upi.com/Defense-News/2015/09/23/US-Navy-tests-upgraded-missile/3861443019797/?spt=trc
nato.int/cps/en/natohq/nato_countries.htm
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

No.

Is that really a thing anymore?

I wouldn't put it past the Chinese.

Oops, forgot to mention HARM's were used to BTFO the HQ 9

Yeah remember the stereotype about chinks being good at cheating at math and burgers being retard?

Well at least we know for sure you're not a chink.

...

Any excuse to see dead burgers in always welcome.
Imagine that look on the transfat's face when [insert pronoun here] gets swatted out of the sky by a cheap S-300.

True, true, burger-kun, war with China would indeed be a good way to purge America without killing off too many good, white men in all honesty. Maybe McNamara-type recruitment does have its usefulness after all.

Heh, nothin' personal white man.

Attached: 1498653721449.gif (800x597, 1.04M)

>>>/cuckchan/

You understand how unhealthy the bugpeople are right? As in can't function correctly without a hit of canned air unhealthy. All they have going for them is sheer numbers.

hownu.ru

Name 1 (one) instance where a harm didn't work, matter of fact the harm is so effective that it can home in moving air to air targets
Source
Lake, Jon (2004). B-52 Stratofortress Units in Operation Desert Storm (1 ed.). Oxford: Osprey. pp. 47–48.

LOL


retard ;)

I already did you idiot but I guess I have to again.

Lake, Jon (2004). B-52 Stratofortress Units in Operation Desert Storm (1 ed.). Oxford: Osprey. pp. 47–48.
And another source.
upi.com/Defense-News/2015/09/23/US-Navy-tests-upgraded-missile/3861443019797/?spt=trc

Vast majority of the missiles did not even hit their target. They were only "successful" in forcing sandnigger air-defenses to go silent.

Sorry forgot something.

You do know that the moment the ordnance leaves the plane it's a great success for the air-force, right?
Where it actually lands is an afterthought.

Checkmate bugmen.

Attached: 5g0isj8cyra21.jpg (1660x1107, 114.96K)

Heh, nothin' personal everything.

Attached: FMS-Model-Twin-70mm-EDF-Jet-A10-PNP-FMS094.jpg (631x322, 30K)

Nothing personnel kid.

Attached: 43762818162_19058fcb60_b.jpg (1024x727, 142.94K)

ah hon hon hon, nothing baguette kid.

Attached: csoK6jU.jpg (2000x1335, 451.88K)

GRUG GRUG GRUG. NO ZUGNOG, LITTLE ONE.

Attached: Tear_gas_grenade_returned_to_soldiers_using_sling.jpg (4257x2387 37.34 KB, 3.11M)

Blantanlty false.

Fast forward a month latter

In the whole history of warfare, air campaigns NEVER HAD ANY NOTICEABLE EFFECTS on successful (or not) operations.

Source for your claims or what you're saying is blantantly false.

...

...

Attached: Vire_1944 no strategic effects.jpg (3245x3877 332.49 KB, 6.62M)

Oh, they're great at killing civilians no doubt… but that's about the only thing that they're good at.
Germany and Japan were bombed for most of the war to no measurable effect on the military, even at production level as they both kept making tanks, vehicles, guns and ships at virtually the same rate as day one, with supplies and logistics moving with minimal hindrance up until lines, fronts and command started to collapse due to land/naval operations.
And the same shit happened in Korea.
And the same shit happened in Vietnam.

In regards to Hiroshima and Nagasaki, there wasn't too much left in regards to industrial power after being vaporized.

How retarded do you need to be to believe this?

Did it ever occure to you that france is part of nato?

No it isn't, cuckmutt.
MUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTTMUTT

Prove your shit, nigger.

Then why is it listed as a member state on the NATO website and listed as a participant in a plurality of the organization's activities on every single relevant source?
nato.int/cps/en/natohq/nato_countries.htm

It didn't do shit to the german war machine given production hit a record peak in April of 45. Despite the constant bombing of the Krupp facilities in Essen, it never actually slowed production. Bombing the railways on the other hand hampered getting stuff to places on time to a point.

BRRRRRT can't even pierce a T-62 from anywhere but the rear.

How do you think that in WWII they sometimes bombed the WRONG COUNTRY.
Bombing the wrong city happened almost every mission, so:
-First, the idea that they could actually find the factories they were aiming at is ludicrous AND IT IS STILL LARGELY TRUE TODAY. Even with drone 24/7 surveillance. We don't miss as much but… the way we pick which building to hit is always, at best an educated GUESS.
-Second, said factories were either armored (concrete is cheaper than planes) or simply dispersed in a way that even if you would take one out work would continue by another temporarily picking up the slack with the extra workers while it was getting repaired.
-Third, railways are nigh impossible to destroy.
-Fourth, damage repair is a thing, railways are terribly resilient because you can fix them way faster than you can bomb them.

There was a joke about the nuclear triad during the cold war that went like this:
-Our submarines are what guarantee MAD and if not missile silos are considerably safer than bombers, why do we bother having bombs.
-The airforce want nuclear bombs.
-Why?
-They want to drop them from an airplane.
-But… they're not very good at it, sometimes they can't even find their own runways! They would probably never find Moscow and if they did they would probably miss it.
-Well you see all they're really interested is zoom around and dropping things on people. It's capital to them, and you do know we've taken all the inbreed hotheads from "good families" we had in the WWI cavalry and put them all in the airforce? So it's capital to the military that they stay there, where they don't do any harm to the army.
-So you're giving them nuclear bombs… so they can't harm anyone?
-Well yes. After all, either we will never use them or if we do nobody is gonna be there to miss whatever it was that they bombed by mistake.

Airplane bombs efficient military usage is CAS and guided strike from ground teams (that literally have eyes on the target and a reason to blow something up… and the airforce still manages to fuck that up regularly).

"Strategic" bombing is terror bombing.

So?
You want the name of a french battle where the key component was air power?
Diên Biên Phu.

Fuck off.

Only cucks care about that gay shit.

This is true only for 'dumb' bombs. It's half the reason why everyone has such a hard on for guided munitions. The fact that you can sell I don't know how many thousands of dollars of electronics with each piece of disposable ordinance is the other reason.

This, but unironically.

Satellite imagery, thermobaric munitions and the Russian air force tend to disagree.
As for those who cannot reliably hit the right target, who cares if you took out half a city block in your pursuit to remove a suspected snackbar IED workshop inna tent somewhere outside town?
All you have to do is use expensive L*ckheeb-brand smart munitions and everything will be A-ok, you could even embezzle some shekels from proud anti-american NGO charities "helping" victims of burger chair attacks!

Attached: kebab_Recognition_Syria.webm (640x320, 7.38M)

Well? Which one is it?


Their tanks, vehicles guns and ships all had a VERY noticeable degrade in build quality and reliability as the bombs rained down. German heat treatment of armor steels got so bad you had shit like Russian AT rifles piercing the sides of panthers while American 37mm peashooters cracked their front plate clean through. Both of which are things that should have been literally impossible to happen if they were made to spec. They even designed and made a single Panther 2 that had thicker side armor before realizing AT rifles could be stopped with side skirts to pad out the shit tier armor.


You are attributing things that happened during British night time raids to American day time precision bombing strikes along with implying a whole lot of other shit without any sources.

Attached: disbelief.PNG (176x317, 51.22K)

Pretty standard for some nations, less chance of untrained drivers getting lost if they just follow the next tank.

Attached: aUqS6Ka.jpg (1024x685, 254.13K)

gps jammers are the size of cellphones and cover city blocks.


bombing serb civilians was successful, because we could find their bridges and power plants. bombing serb military was unsuccessful, in fact i think it made them stronger by removing shit hardware that was sucking up funds.