Pray for FWBC. Another one of their deacons denies the trinity

(You)

Um, sweaty…

I don't understand what happened here. What did the guy they threw out want?

I just want to say how deep bitterness and furious I feel hearing anyone deny the Holy Trinity, nothing else gets me this mad.

>youtube.com/watch?v=womGz0OGcwo
Drama in the comment section. Mrs. Anderson is throwing shade at the deacon's wife.

Attached: d280ffcbfb1393d2a5dceb2e13a6a4eadcb32a2529d3b30b9c012869c1624058.jpeg (470x470, 42.7K)

The WEBM is cut in a weird way that implies Anderson himself denies the trinity, but in fact he was just making fun of the idea that people claim "oh God is just one person". The 'bozo' that rose was likely going to point out something he found in Scripture that he believes denies the trinity, so Anderson tossed him out

I though the same.

Beware of false prophets, who come to you in the clothing of sheep, but inwardly they are ravening wolves. By their fruits you shall know them. Do men gather grapes of thorns, or figs of thistles? Matt 7:15-16

For there is no good tree that bringeth forth evil fruit; nor an evil tree that bringeth forth good fruit. Luke 6:43

Attached: fig-tree.jpg (1024x547, 115.51K)

The guy was being intentionally provocative attempting in trying to disrupt the service. He deserved to be thrown out. What he was doing was theatre. No, "violence" was done. You're such a weak compromiser with modernity you see a few guys quickly pushing a guy out (so that he doesn't interrupt the service any longer) without doing any bodily harm to him, without causing him pain, keeping him perfectly upright and on his own two feet, as "goons violently dragging him out."

He already goes to Nestorianism to deny Theotokos so he's already up to 4 not a trinity anyway isn't he?

Oh sweatie, no.. :(

Gnostics must be very sweaty

Attached: cc8f245343bcb69e210846295aeed110-450x300.jpg (450x300, 14.74K)

He made him leave during a sermon. I did not see torture or burning at the stake. I do not see the commonality.

GO PASTOR ANDERSON! GET THAT BLASPHEMER OUT! ALL HERETICS NEED TO BE PURGED!

Oh shit….

Attached: Screenshot 2018-05-28 at 12.34.48 AM.png (852x155, 56K)

Attached: Screenshot 2018-05-28 at 12.39.44 AM.png (876x213, 108.13K)

So what's the truth about the Trinity then?

That's nothing compared to what Santa Claus did to Arians.

Attached: Saint Nicholas.jpg (650x990, 131.77K)

The truth is that it's the quantum physics of theology. It's a truth cloaked in mystery by the limits of human understanding and observation.

Do you usually believe every retardation pastor Jim tells you?

You are missiong the point, my mentally challenged friend. People who read the Bible can understand it in any way they want when there is no authority. That is why there are 6 gorillion protestant denominations claiming to "just follow the Bible" while contradiccting each other.

So we should force them to understand it in the way the pope wants? What if instead of understanding it the way some man wants we just believe what it says?

Heretics were just exiled out of office, if they didn't recant.

I pray for them because they hate. They hate incredibly. There is no love in them.

Former Andersonite here, I pray for them. I just find it disturbing that so many of their high-ranking officials are "converting" over to modalism. They're pretty much one-step away from Jehovah Witnesses due to their over-reliance on words and syntax of the Bible without any guidance of the Holy Spirit.

I have to place the blame on Pastor Anderson for sowing mistrust in other Bible translations (yes, few are bad, but not all) and for effectively worshipping the 1611 KJV Bible instead of truly worshipping God in Spirit and in Truth (John 4:24).

Attached: supper.jpg (1732x1113, 116.52K)

Did you actually attend services there? can you tell us more of your time in that group?

>(((heretics))) weren't burned at the stake
Are you actually this retarded?

LOL, to be this diluted with envy and pride. Make no false witness. Comments on a post that reflects no idea or concept of (pastor Jim), just watching a correct way to escort disruptive people out of any public gathering.

Well we are all saved in the catholic church now since even atheist are accepted into their salvation in or out of the Official Church™. Thank you vicar of Christ on earth, Catholics and Mormons agree, The living profit is better then the dead ones.

Maybe for the people.
Their church and their theology, however?
Screw them and let them rot.

You still don't seem to have got the point.

The Bible's verses have some true, objective, infallible meaning which the author intended them to have.

In order to get this meaning, we must use our intellect to deduce what meaning the author tried to convey using the words he has chosen to use.

It's at this stage that error can happen, since at this point the reader is using his fallible, human intellect to deduce the meaning from the text. Since the reader's intellect is fallible and finite, he can unwittingly deduce the words to have the meaning they don't have - a meaning different from the one that the author tried to transmit through them. This can happen because our intellects are fallible, and so when we use them, we don't have a guarantee we will succeed - we can still deduce some incorrect conclusion, because, again, our intellects are fallible.

And so, even though there is an objective meaning of the Bible's verses, if we want to access it by reading their words, we have to use our fallible intellects. And fallible things can fail us.

We must believe what the Bible says - but how do we know that it says this thing, and not another? The text is directly accessible to us; but its meaning (i.e. what the Bible says) must be deduced from the text, and deduction is an act of a fallible mind.

Attached: 4933f0880e76bcc2c9a08de46f1cc2d54079536bcd06d3b90bd93e867b70b280.jpeg (1024x807, 199.71K)

Lying is a sin user.

I assume you aren't spreading falsehoods on purpose - but by being negligent and not checking the facts first you are still being careless about your action's effects. Through your carelessness in checking your sources you show that you don't care whether a falsehood will be spread or not.

The pope literally saidbatheists can go to to heaven if they be a good boi

and he said it was okay to be gay

He said there is noo hell so what's the difference, yay!

He didn't, and you would know this if you spent five minutes on researching it.

See:

And do your research first, post second.

Seems like he did say it
americamagazine.org/faith/2018/04/19/was-pope-francis-right-tell-child-his-atheist-dad-may-be-heaven

He also wants to ban guns

Attached: 0F0CAAB3-3525-4356-8943-6AFEE3D42F20.jpeg (492x265, 25.76K)

Imagine unironically defending this satanic psychopath

Its almost as of you heathens dont care that jesus himself appointed the Pope to his position. If the Pope says atheists can go to heaven, who am I to judge?

Also, does anyone reaaaaaaally need a gun?

Attached: 845570c7b6416df38eb3ce19633df88a--roman-catholic-papa-francesco.jpg (720x720, 29.64K)

"God is the one who says who goes to heaven" in response to a small boy's question whether his atheist father is un Heaven, is a very, obviously and blatantly different thing than "Atheists go to Heaven if they are good".

This is why the no one likes politicians

Perhaps it's lying by omission, I think it's defendable that it's not, but nothing he said was theologically wrong.

Literally everybody just begome western rite Orthodox. Problem solved. :)

Attached: IconP-Christ18-2.jpg (300x394, 62.26K)

Attached: tumblr_p8s7lwCUBE1xoyw8po1_400.gif (400x208, 2.63M)

Jesus specifically gave Peter (and Peter alone) the key to the church, He didn't create this bastardized handed down bureaucracy known as the papacy.

I don't remember that part of the conversation

But think about it. If some lay fedora saw that, he can conclude that

This.

Attached: 998189_216122438535999_2089990230_n.jpg (720x960, 71.08K)

...

Where did he say to give it to anyone else?

What are you people doing over there? Generally speaking, you don't wind up with multiple heretical deacons serving in the same church.

Goy! He preaches hard on the trinity especially after he fired Baker

(not his main account, but still makes you wonder)

Attached: image.png (482x114, 13.66K)

Don't Baptists claim descended from Gnostic groups on the trail of blood.

Yes, they put the Cathars as their ideological forefathers.

Sad. Anderson is the most proud, hateful, tribal, mean, bitter, self-righteous man I have ever seen call himself a Christian. It brings me sorrow that anyone actually listens to what he has to say and then believes that he is a light-bearer of God and Jesus.

Baptist bigots btfo

...

1. He was probably a modalist
2. He completely interupted the service and when was told to sit down he didn't
3. If he lets him do it then more people will start to

Did you come from the Zig Forums thread on Christianity?

either that guy was really dumb or this is staged drama

No evidence for this
Agreed, but Anderson did act too reactively.
3. If he lets him do it then more people will start to
Unless he explicitly tells the people not to do it again

Anderson should have just told him to wait until after the service.

Not so, he was denying Jack Daniels.

Well he did right when Anderson was yelling about modalism. And he should have went up to him before or after the service instead.

I dunno what kind of church you go to but I know my pastor kinda well but I could never imagine interrupting his preaching to talk.

Butthurt modalists itt.

The pope thinks God makes people homosexual and atheists can go to heaven so is Catholic authority really doing any better? I mean you have 6 gorillion interpretations of Catholic doctrine, most of you Catholics on Zig Forums probably interpret it differently than the pope.

The Pope can think whatever he wants, we're not bound to obey him if he is in error, especially if nothing he says is ex cathedra.

Why do you heap calumnies on us?

well, it's not a real church anyway anderson

This is only speculation, and I agree with the second point, it was totally inappropriate for him to interject when he did. Then again, it was inappropriate for Anderson to react the way he did.

I wouldn't say that it is ever appropriate to interrupt a sermon, but obviously the guy didn't know that, so I think it would've been best to tell him to wait until the end of service and not to interrupt again. To throw him out and call him names is a bit extreme IMO.

Attached: supa hot fire.gif (640x360, 3.66M)

...

...

Doesn't count. He wasn't speaking in ex baptismo

SODOMITE DETECTED

This but also this

< #underrated

Attached: yes-moar-of-that-biden.jpg (360x235, 19.43K)

I'll pray for you.

Kek

Oh shoot fam. Did anybody saved all of the vids from the sanderson1769 channel? I would be disappointed if those vids from Anderson alt channel where lost for good.

Why did it get deleted but not his main?

Someone doesn't understand biblical meekness. Go read up on it.

This
meek =/= weak

Yeah I get whips and table throwing and idol-smashing is a thing, that doesn't mean that the man wasn't even given the dignity of a response or even the ability to exit on his own two feet. Other congregants need to tell these guys to let him just walk. It is an excessively wrathful response through and through.
"Wherefore, my beloved brethren, let every man be swift to hear, slow to speak, slow to wrath: For the wrath of man worketh not the righteousness of God." -James 1:19–20
Meek does not mean weak, but anger is not automatically righteous if done in the name of God, especially when not tempered with patience.

He used the 1769 channel to post more controversial sermons and videos. He's been keeping his main account free of that stuff ever since he was temporary banned.

Anderson told him to sit down or leave and he kept walking up.

Also either way Anderson didn't do it in ex baptisma so it doesn't count anyways

And Peter told Anderson to be swift to hear, slow to speak, and slow in wrath. If he was just going up to point out a verse, Anderson of all people should have easily put it into context. If he was just going up to troll, as I'm 75% sure he was and I suspect he did, then pearls should not be given swine. That doesn't excuse Anderson and his followers were clearly too quick to wrath in this situation.

Please stop this, it's degrading and pathetic. We know you would be making the same accusations no matter what happened. The guy was told to take his seat and he kept pressing forward, you can clearly see this. It's selective outrage.

Your remorseless, vicious attacks on the Trinity are the real affront here. You are speaking directly against God and I don't see nor understand why in the face of that you think it's nothing.

Attached: tumblr_p86dqaCjCx1syf5uzo1_100.jpg (92x112, 2.6K)

If you don't even believe in God, then get lost!