I'm only interested in correctly identifying living beings correctly. If you're looking at the remains of something, what problem does it solve to figure out what it was, and how would you ever verify that categorization scientifically. Well, that is never necessary to do because all they are doing is creating categories, so they fit them by default.
So since they never verify any of these things, all of these "scientific" categorizations are arbitrary. You can define what you want and create whole system that make it look like you know what you are talking about when it comes to bone fragments, but without any concrete proof you are just treading water
Cameron Fisher
So basically you're going to continue saying that man and beast are separate and claim that none of this fossil evidence goes against it because they're dead?
Hunter Powell
ITT: Same shit, different day. There are multiple threads up for this same subject. Mods need to get to pruning.
William Bennett
God do I hate these threads. Data wise we don't actually know shit about them, so no point arguing about them until we do. What we do know is the little Neanderthal DNA thats survived into some modern human genomes is found in noncoding DNA regions, or at best gave us a few coding genes that are practically useless. Reason for why its like that should be obvious if you got an elementary grasp of how natural selection works.
Jaxson Martin
That implies that homo sapiens aren't the sons of Cain. Cain was the farmer, Abel was the Shepard. Only Sapiens farm.
Joseph Martin
There's a simple answer, there are two creation accounts of man. The first being on the 6th day Genesis 1:26 in which they're given a paleolithic diet Genesis 1:29-31 and were charged with filling the earth. Genesis 1:28 The second was the creation of Adam and through him Eve. He was taught farming and other things that will be used to build civilization. The people that Cain is afraid of in Genesis 4:14-15 are the hunter gathers from the first creation account. And it removes the stupid need for incest.
Mason Ramirez
Reminder evolution is just a theory and is neither proved by repeatable experiments nor from a mathematical model. It's just third grade science, merely built upon clues and hypothesis by observing fossils and similarities between species.
Josiah Parker
Why do I need to?
Connor King
WHATTHEACTUALWINNIETHEPOOH?!?!?!
being wrong was a bannable offence now?! what manner of retardation is this?
