New darkmatter video, watch until end and debate

Is this the Saracen version of tipping a fedora?

This is why 'atheists' should be called "antitheists". You people wouldn't trust God, even if you saw half of His glory.

Really

Sunan an-Nasai, Number 307:

It was narrated from Anas bin Malik that some Bedouins from Urainah came to the Prophet and became Muslim, but the climate of Al-Madinah did not suit them; their skin turned yellow and their stomachs became swollen. The Messenger of Allah sent them to some pregnant camels of his and told them to drink their milk and urine until they recovered. Then they killed the camel-herder and drove the camels away. The Messenger of Allah sent people after them, and they were brought back. Their hands and feet were cut off and their eyes were smoldered with burning nails. The Commander of the Believers, Abdul-Malik, said to Anas—when he was narrating this Hadith to him—“(Were they being punished) for Kufr or for a sin?” He said: “For Kufr.”

3 things of note

First, Muhammad’s solution to sickness was drinking camel urine

Second, Islam’s sources claim that the Muslims who drank the camel urine left Islam, scattered Muhammad’s camels, and killed his camel-herder—after the camel urine cured them. But why would they leave Islam and become enraged after following Muhammad’s advice and being cured? Isn’t it far more likely that they drank the camel urine, became even more sick, realized that Muhammad was a false prophet who made them drink camel urine, and scattered Muhammad’s camels in a fit of rage?

Third, Muhammad had his followers chop the men’s hands and feet off and burn out their eyes with hot nails. The men were then left in the heat to die and were refused water. One of them was biting at the ground out of thirst. Muslims often claim that these apostates were tortured, mutilated, and left to die because of what they had done to Muhammad’s camel-herder. But Anas, who narrated the story, was specifically asked whether they were tortured, mutilated, and left to die because of some sin, or because of kufr (their return to unbelief). Anas said that they were tortured, mutilated, and left to die for kufr—unbelief.

Welcome to Islam—the religion that tells you to drink camel urine, then, when you get even sicker and decide to leave, chops off your hands and your feet, burns out your eyes with hot nails, and leaves you to die as you bite the ground from thirst.

It's nonsense, when I could tell darkmatter's God why he's wrong about his role. That his ideas are based on a Marxian "freedom from superstition meme" and that the phrase God-fearing means more than being afraid of some imaginary bearded dude in the sky, and that it means fearing righteous judgement for your actions. Also all the dictators who have demanded worship were unworthy of worship.

In fact, on my understanding of what God is, I would rebuke this creature in the video and say "get behind me Satan!"

Moreover, the alleged deity raises a good point, that the Christian could have taken the Atheist's place. However there is no reason to and it doesn't change the ultimate destination of the 3 chracters, first off Jesus made it clear that nobody would be able to give their spiritual possessions away like with physical ones in the parable of the ten bridesmaids (which is obvious), so the Christian could have assented to any disposal of himself and still ended up in heaven.

All this leads me to the assertion that this polemical invention does not even approximate God.

TL;DR Atheists have officially invented a new religion, and you can tell this because this so-called atheist is willing to assert a new/better relationship with God. Hence total, shameful hypocrisy. What kind of atheist "enlightened being" God would take offense at worship from hairless apes? Why would such a God care enough to talk to said hairless apes about their beliefs after they've died? Why would a God who foreknew that his creations would worship him create creatures who would insult him?

Attached: Shoe.png (625x385, 206.39K)

kek

By the way, the Atheist only escapes hell by never having known any better. However truly unrepentant braying asses like Richard Dawkins, who even when he was a Christian was evidently a very bad one, are the kind of people who do not attain heaven in the hereafter nor the holy spirit in this life.

Don't see the problem here

God bless, user

He was certainly an Atheist

Every time.

Attached: 15672453624.jpg (600x375, 25.94K)