Is Racemixing Prohibited or Allowed?

Like the question is racemixing allowed? I mean there are disadvantages to racemixing, (identity crisises for children and etc.) but I was wondering whether or not it was mention in the bible as well or is the concept just reduced to some stories in the old testament

Attached: 09-512.png (512x512, 3.45K)

Ask a priest.

It's not a sin, but I don't think it's very wise.

Also, take it to Zig Forumspol

didn't even know there was such thing as christian pol lol

It's a sticky my dude

You will only find the same answers as every single other time that we've had this thread.

This coming from an Asian mongrel, biblically sinful? No. But half-breed tends to have health problems (I cannot eat beef for example), and more often than not have identity problems. Which heritage do I belong to? My father? Or my mother? Or my country of birth/residence of childhood if my parents are not of that land. Who am I in this world? Etc.

I would say keep it around your neighbouring lands. People mingle all the time, but across continents problems will begin to appear. And in this volatile political climate, let us just put everything in the hands of our Lord.

You are of the Kingdom of God, and a child of God. All else is meaningless.

No. No. And no.

Attached: DHrqGxVUMAAOeMY.jpg (736x540, 59.16K)

Stop.

You don't know what you're talking about. Source: my own family.

I don't think there is conclusive argumentation for either stance, but check pic related.


Pretty much this. South America is the biggest mess on earth because it is the most racemixed, thanks to the Catholic church.

Attached: Bible_against_racemixing.png (1548x2592, 724.36K)

Attached: 93822.jpeg (232x218, 5.35K)

Wanna hear my most honest advice? Go to Kazakhstan and adopt the language and culture there, or some other place between Europe and Asia. The first condition to fitting in somewhere is fitting in racially. Long-term you will be much happier if you fit in close to 100% somewhere, instead of only 70%.
Everything can be learned, apart from race and blood.

Why not both???

This is why you're alone.

This kind of resentment is sad. Eliot Rodger tier thinking.

It's just some verses. I don't see why you're offended, are you perchance from Zig Forums?

...

The first convert was african.
The messiah was jewish.
My friend, there is no "mixing", all are children of god and we are all humans.
Christianity is the radical notion that we're all the same in the eyes of the holy father. There is one race - God's children.

So?
Yes! Thank them! They've taken a step towards a world with one less part of bile within it. A world in which no man be judged by his skin but instead will see a world where EVERY knee shall bow not just HWHITE people but EVERY KNEE

PRAISE BE THE LORD ALL MIGHTY WHO REIGNS FOREVER AND EVER MORE FOR ALL MEN TO HE ARE HIS CHILDREN AND HIS CHILDREN SHALL LOVE HIM

Grow up Zig Forums, WE ARE ONE

That is why I have been picking up languages and cultures left and right.


Both of my parents heritages are under attack from radical secularism and American Imperialism. Traditional Chinese arts and cultures exists only in HK and Taiwan and it is dying out by generation. The dialect of my mother will probably die with her generation.

Meanwhile, I have no clear idea of who my father really is. He is an enigma, comes by now and then. Does not really reveal anything about himself except that he have ties to Japan.

Also, Japanese traditional arts and culture are not being picked up anymore. It will go by this generations of their elders who is doing their darnest to preserve their nations, thanks to Americunts. This is the land which I want to lay my body in. I speak Japanese, and wish to learn more of their culture and live like one. Be that as it may, I am not and probably will not ever be.

I only have one life, and it does not even belong to me. It belongs to the Lord, I cannot save both heritages with it. Let alone the beautiful European cultures which is under direct fire from the enemy which I also love.

Why do people say this? Wasn't the Roman Centurion technically the first convert? Or the thief on the cross? or is my chronology wrong?

Your chronology is wrong.

Why is the eunuch prior to cornelius?

Wasn't true conversion

This is a kike.

These kikes also say that Hitler was one of them.

They like taking their largest enemies and importing them into the fold.

What is it that the Talmud says about Jesus, Moishe? Oh right, Talmud says Jesus boils in hell in a pool of feces and that his followers will boil in hell in a pool of piss.

Attached: trump-shrug-gettyimages-488226322-copy[1].jpg (960x628, 128.13K)

I'll pray for you that you come to see that we are all children of god.
Your use of that word is evidence you have a lot of growing up to do.

Where does it say that? Does not the Bible also have atrocity easily misinterpreted? Don't forget

Cornelius was definitely a convert, he just wasn't "proselytized"

Your soul can still be saved but your family tree is screwed. Miscegenation is the most selfish thing a woman can do.

ahhh, the Zig Forums and Zig Forums invasion thread where they bait each other and all the regular posters just move to productive threads… except me, what a tool I am…

Talmudists hate and mock Christ but that doesn't mean we have to hate and mock them. Even the noble pagan sages understood that you shouldn't repay evil for evil.
—————-
Socrates: isn't wrongdoing inevitably an evil and a disgrace to the wrongdoer? Do we believe this or not?

Crito: We do.

Socrates: Then we ought not to do wrong at all.

Crito: Indeed.

Socrates: And we ought not even to return wrong with wrong, as the world thinks.

Crito: Apparently not.

Socrates: Well, Crito, ought one to do evil or not?

Crito: Certainly not, Socrates.

Socrates: Then, is it right to requite evil with evil, as the world says it is, or not right?

Crito: Not right, certainly.
———————-

Quote. Where. It. Says. In. The. Talmud.

You all claim this but don't seem to say it.

The talmud is very convoluted and sneaky. Wikipedia has an article on it, some rabbis interpret it as Jesus boiling in hell, other rabbis try to do damage control and deny it. It's up for "interpretation"

Attached: eb55a1d99f203057fb431d949541fbc336025b290d72370d5df9ca0d6876fc42.jpg (2005x1221, 512.46K)

So you have none?
Amazing. Zig Forums logic at it's finest!

allowed

GEt as much BBC as you can boy

Attached: 20fd9ed0c941.jpg (339x506, 186.69K)

No that's because of corruption and Marxist socialism.

And the biggest blackest cock you can swallow white boy

Attached: 2136602562.jpg (856x1141, 160.2K)

0:37

How deep can you take it white boi?

Attached: thumb_13.jpg (170x215, 13.74K)

more

Attached: The Talmud on JC.webm (640x360, 8.26M)

Treason is the biggest sin in medieval Catholic society. Read Dante's Inferno. The 12 plane on hell is reserved for traitors.

12th

Attached: 1450725461802.jpg (460x500, 42.4K)

...

...

Some people are just so hateful

basically this

Said no one ever.

Numbers 12
Moses marries an Ethiopian and Aaron and Miriam get upset about, so God smites Miriam with Leprousy.

Having said that, I don't think it's healthy for a society to practice large scale mixing, but it's clear that we shouldn't judge others based on that alone.

???

I don't understand what's wrong with trying to preserve your ethnicity through your children. The Bible says nothing about marrying people from your race, nor does it condemn (that is debatable though) marrying individuals from other races. I however believe it is not healthy for the child to do so. The child will grow up without an identity set in stone, he will be prone to diseases, and he won't be accustomed to specific climates. In my opinion, just let people marry from their own race, and don't push them to marry from other races. Diversity is beautiful when separate. Otherwise we'll just have a colorless pool of paint with no meaning to it. Why is this looked down upon?

Then what does it matter what your grandchildren look like?

Pretty much my opinion. The media shouldn't push for it, and I prefer my own race, but if my fellow man marries a woman of different ancestry, so be it. I work with a large family that has mixed children, and they are honestly a joy to be around. They put the Word into practice more than most people I know.

Ok the problem people keep running into is they assume Ethiopia in the Bible is equivalent to the borders of the modern country. That's actually not true, the queen of Sheba (Saba), the Ethiopian eunuch of Candace, and the Sabaeans all come from modern-day Yemen in Arabia, which in ancient times was in the region of Ethiopia. South Arabia and Yemen was not populated by black Africans. Also the ethiopian eunuch in Acts 8 was specifically a Jew because the first conversion of gentiles wasn't until Acts 10:45. It makes sense because he was from Arabia and according to Acts 2:5 there were Jews from every nation present in Jerusalem.


Only because some people are trying to destroy this nation. Remember that according to the word of God, your identity and nation will continue with you into eternity even after you die.

No it's not, Zig Forums now plz convert or go

Attached: YY6OPel.png (342x444, 96.3K)

If you know about the degenerate effects and still do it knowing it will permanently harm your child, then I would say it's a sin.

And I don't disagree with it. Yet I only want to live with my family under one roof, and with my nation in one state.

This.

That’s so unchristian, it hurts.

its very hard to do so.
Choosing one is hard enough. Im hapa and heres how my experiences go.

tbh i should just go celebate and join a priesthood. a Tip to any Christanons out there. The ElliotRodger meme is real. No matter how much yellow fever or jungle fever or any fever really, your kids will end up winnie the poohed and have an identity crisis.

Attached: serveimaadfge.jpg (400x400, 32.03K)

Go ahead if you dont care about your offspring

Can someone explain these "horrible effects" of mixed offspring?

Dude, what kind of shitty place do you live in where people will reject you because of your physical appearance? You shouldn’t even care to fit in with such shallow-minded people. And will you please stop grouping all races like they are hive minds? Surely there are whites and Asians who will like you despite your appearance.

On top of that, you need to gain confidence in yourself. If you don’t even esteem yourself, no one else will. Maybe that’s like you don’t fit in with “whites” and “Asians.”

So what? That’s the case with many “pure blooded” Christians. You should build social groups based on shared beliefs and idealogies, not something as shallow as race. I grew up around my race, and it really isn’t all that it’s cracked up to be. My mother was much different than most blacks, so I was raised with a different mindset than the rest of the blacks in Southern Louisiana. As a result, I didn’t have any friends until I started acting like them.

Race-mixing in a of itself isn't a sin.

However quite a few evils often come with it, namely the alienation from mixed children and their health problems, race mixed couples are more likely to divorce or have spousal abuse. Also there is a broad conflict and alienation in society that comes with multiple races living in the same polity and in a heterogeneous distribution, as we see in America and increasingly in Europe.

If we understand this, and as Christians we understand that we are to good by our neighbor, than we should generally be opposed race-mixing out of charity.

Attached: bf876de1ff9c5a71c564648af9af0f42074e131fdb2623a909886742ac2c4ce2.jpg (728x1083, 142.9K)

Let's say it's discouraged.
If practiced on a mass level it kills nations, and is often the result of a divine punishment.

This. The Biblical doesn't ban committing a vehicular hit and run either, but if we understand the spirit of the Gospel certain things are obvious.

There is none. People who have a personal gripe against interracial relations will cherry pick scientific studies to prove their case. Usually, people will harp on and on and on and on about muh bone marrow transplant. What they don’t know or won’t tell you is that leukemia isn’t even treated like that in most cases.

Many mixed raced people will have mental health problems, but it’s because people are ostracizing them and making a big fu¢king deal about race in the first place. If you isolate someone for reasons outside of their control, then of course they will develop problems. That’s like bullying someone, and then wondering why they are depressed or withdrawn. People can take their “nationalistic sentiments” and shove it up their ass.

Dude, who says that you can’t marry someone exclusively of your own race? Just don’t harass other people who choose to marry outside their race. Stop whining and playing the victim; it gets old fast.

Do it. I did. No regrets.

Ugly kids who don't look like you for one. There are many more, but you really need to hear something beyond that?

Just winnie the pooh naive and dumb. People form social bonds and a cultural framework the same way everywhere, and race is part of that. To do what you want and overturn the current social framework in order to better promote miscegenation is at best useless because there is NO benefit to racemixing (since you seem to be determined to overlook the obvious drawbacks), while in reality it would be (or rather is being) the cause of social ruin and despair. It's an idiotic and utopian idea that is centered around a totally trivial concern, that being that tragic mulattoes and mudsharks don't have to be sad about being misfits, and it won't accomplish even that. It will however mortgage the welfare of society at large in order to try to get reality to align with your liberal sensibilities.

Literally picking up pennies in front of steamrollers, only dumber (you actually might get the penny!)


Go give shitty advice somewhere else retard

The whole point of the different languages and races was to deatroy the tower of Babel and divide human kind so that they don't pride themselves.
Race mixing is ok but it's better to keep things divided.

Factually wrong.
Only those who convert are.
And even so, by mixing races together you are undoing God's work and will.
God scattered the people at the tower of Babel, and all the nations and cultures with all the languages are a result of his will.

Who are you to undo that or to question it's validity?

Yes, yes you are, and it's unquestionable. God's will was that people spread out and populate the earth, and be distinct. You attempt to undo that. You want everyone to speak english and have the same colour of skin.


Look up the studies instead of protesting.


This.
Children are not your accessories, they are not your toys or pets. They are sould entrusted to you by God, so you should do everything to make them succeed. Having them deal with totally unneccessary identity issues because you wanted to make a fashion statement falls into the sin of vanity and you must repent!


The whole world is like this, not to mention that inner acceptance is even harder if you don't have a stable and solid group to identify as a part of. Being christian could be one, but that is mostly once a week in a church, and even there you'll get looks, well-intentioned or not.

Indeed, he shouldn't care about fitting in with the likes of you. You'll just use and abuse him for your political agenda and cast him aside.

To a shallow person, everything seems shallow.

No wonder, given your ancestry.


And these are just the health issues.


Satanic lies, as always.


This was the original will of God, so it is a good thing because God always does what is right, and you're nothing, so your opinion on the matter is useless and shouldn't be lsitened to. God's will and wisdom is absolute and so if he created a world with separate races and languages it is because those are good things and should be respected, cherished and preserved.

It's one of those standards that are not in the bible but can be practiced be Christians as long as they're love their neighbor. There should be nothing wrong with having standards. Some minorities avoid race mixing, the bible does say not to marry a non-believer.

Attached: cdc.jpg (577x537, 31.91K)

You're welcome.

No no, the point is that we are homogeneous within our nations.

This


Absolutely true; but still unwise to cross the streams…

Wait…are you implying the races are even more separated from one another than different species of human?


But the issue here is race first and foremost, let's not sugar-coat it.

You do realize that word originally referred only to the white man, right?
Your liberal demonkind had to redefine that word over and over again to include all races of bipedal monkeys, so no wonder that peoplse see through your bullshit.

Also, it's time for you to admit that you want to paint everything with the same brush for the sake of simplicity because you don't want to deal with problems of complexity.

...

Man was also specifically used to describe white people.


Non-whites

No, that's when your kind tries to make gay-marriage okay.
There are distinctions and they exist for good reasons. To undo them is foolish and quite frankly, vain and evil.

By who, exactly?

I'm curious, what brought you to this conclusion?

...

I see variety, and since we are able to reproduce we aren't speciated.

Meaning you I'm guessing?

That apply to developed countries, or just your cherry-picked shitholes?

So can horses and donkeys, yet they are a different species.
So can different species of frogs, and yet the frogs are still of a different species.

Also this
You are just pretending the whites have no legitimacy because it exists on a spectrum.

There is a reason why there were debates back in the day whether native americans should be called humans. Stop playing dumb.

Let me guess, all the non-white developed countries are asian?
It's funny how white shitholes are still attractive enopugh for non-whites to migrate into tho.
Surely it has nothing to do with whiteness and the civilizations that they build.

And most are sterile. Mixed children have no issue breeding.

What do you even mean by this? Preservation? Creatures tend to group with others that resemble them, regardless of whatever shadow government organization you think is trying to destroy them.

That's because they didn't know of land bridges, and assumed they were of some other distinctly created race, separate from Adam's lineage. Stop acting as though other races and tribes were considered animals at one point.

And yet most have managed to crumble, white and non alike. Also I find it interesting that you mentioned Asians specifically, do they count as human on some arbitrary technicality?

I love how you conveniently ignored the frog part because different species of frogs produce fertile (viable) offspring, but that doesn't mean that those different species of frogs are now one.

You are not getting out of this.
There are different species, and interbreeding doesn't destroy the validity of their existence.

I mean that you are pretending that the legitimacy of human races is null and void because interbreeding exists.

They literally were considered animals. Just look at how the Irish were treated. Look at the slave trades. The arabs castrated (and to this very day they still do) every single one of their black slaves. How can you buy and sell a thing, mutilate it and still consider it human and/or equal?

Only because of people like you.
You are the disease.

I mentioned them pre-emptively because they are literally the only other race that built a civilization that is in any way comparable to white ones in terms of advancement. Not that it would disprove the OBVIOUSLY GLARING differences between the different races, given that their societies were radically different from ours.


I would call you Satan, but I'll just call you a marxist.

This is the level of liberalism you're on.

...

Stormfags trying to give taxonomy arguments is the cringiest shit i always see.

The words you are looking for to describe human variability are ecotype and cline.

Moving the goalpost, like a good liberal. Luckily for me, my point still stands, because this is not a question of relatedness, but classification.

You said that since we can interbreed we are the same race( ), but we have counter-examples of different species producing viable and non-viable offspring, meaning that the abiliyt to interbreed doesn't disprove race.

A race is not an invalid category just because it can interbreed and produce viable offspring with another one.

That is exactly what you did.
You said that we are all the same species, meaning there are no different human races.
At best, you act like we should act as if all people were the same race. I deny that.

There is nothing wonderful about morbidity.

Moving the goalpost, moving on

Because you are transcendentally evil?

What's funny is even by taxonomic standards he's wrong. Anything within the genus Homo is considered human, and every race upon this earth is Homo Sapiens Sapiens.


You've already demonstrated that you're working on absolutes, and don't wish to go into the complexity of phylogenetic relationships between organisms, so I'll merely leave you with something to chew on: what was your and a black man's ancestor? A human, or something else?

Yep, because the question is not whether there are phylogenetic relationships, but whether it's okay to race-mix or not.

Science isn't the authority on this question. God and Tradition is.

You've made the white race into your god, considering the other races to be mere animals by comparison. I pity you

I pity you. You have no understanding of God, or his will. For you he is nothing more than empty platitudes of freedom and equality, instead of love and kinship.

You've made equality your god, and it is a false god.

So what, only larp pagans do this. Humanist scumbag pice of shit go live in a 3rd world asshole.

What are you? Orthodox?