I don't get why we even put links in the OP no one reads them
Bentley King
I don't even care who fucking did it, I'm fed up of being dragged closer to war with Russia for the sake of fellow white people
Caleb Carter
Wew I dont know why they didn't just say they were coming here on holiday.
Oliver Ramirez
To hide Telford.
>"I don't read them so nobody reads them"
Nathan Sanchez
tbh their behaviour reminds me of the gays who went out of their way to cause a commotion and then cry "aaaah homophobia :((((" and antifa crying "victim!" when they go to start trouble.
Josiah Hill
Lad why would anyone read them, we are able to look at the news on our own, smh it's almost as bad as reading the thread from before you post in it
Thomas Howard
Bit far fetched to say they took out Ken Dodd just to cover up Telford dont ythink
Jayden Scott
>"why should we have discussions about the news in the threads when you can just go and read about it elsewhere" Let's never post articles nor have discussions as kardashianposter doesn't want that, we can just go into the article comments section instead.
Its possible that Alex Jones might be coming to speaker's corner this Sunday to support Tommy!
Carter Allen
We don't discuss links in the OP only the ones posted in the thread, if anything it stifles discussion.
That seems a very odd use of Zig Forums I doubt people do that.
I know, why would anyone read through others inane shitposts
Dylan Rogers
...
Adam Gutierrez
This place also acts as a giant filter for crappy articles, people don't want to trawl through a dozen articles about celeb toes just to find a relevant news article. Also think of how many of us wouldn't have heard about Telford if it weren't foe the threads, seeing as most outlets weren't publishing the story.
Aiden Fisher
*charges towards you*
Jacob Evans
Good idea lad, those are the only posts that matter after all. >messed up my greentext smh
I like to see what shenanigans people got up to while I was asleep tbh. It's entertaining to read while I eat my breakfast, and the thread usually isn't very fast at that hour anyway.
Speak for yourself, I've seen OP link discussion plenty of times.
How; you're not forced to read them, it's there for people to read if they choose to, and they can start a discussion if they choose to. You're just making shit up now.
Connor Russell
What a silly debate.
Samuel Brown
Next time just have no links,a picture of a scone with jam and be done with it.
James Allen
fuck Dunblane and every fucking buzzfeed roastie cunt fud under the sun
LADS someone post the pic of sarcuck next to the traffic light okay thank you
Joseph Adams
For every 1 example I can show you twenty where people don't. Links posted in the thread creates discussion and talking points, ones in the OP go largely ignored. Therefore create less discussion whilst expending more effort.
Asher Fisher
are you going there to take measurements?
Grayson Rodriguez
...
Noah Howard
A group that expects a certain standard of quality from the actions of its members is harder to infiltrate and subvert tbh. Removing barriers to entry, lowering the quality of discussion, and encouraging new members to join in without internalising the group's cultural mores is Internet Community Subversion 101 tbh. spies (Nick Lowles, Hope not Hate, Gerry Gable, Searchlight Magazine) like to be the ones to control the discussion, and making the new thread is a part of that, even though it offers no control over what goes on inside the thread.
tbh lad
Generally speaking, links posted in the thread are new. Links in the OP have often been posted in the previous thread, and already discussed.
OP links are daily updates. People who later discuss them in a later thread might have missed them earlier in the day. There are people who come and go from Zig Forums for weeks or months at a time. If a Zig Forums user returns after weeks of being off the site, the links in the OP, along with the numbering system, also serve as an archive, meanong we have reference points that can be found in a reasonable amount of time for those out of the loop.
Remove yourself Lancashite, you fucking mackerel.
Xavier Mitchell
From what I notice they are generally new when from the time a person creates the thread. We certainly don't discuss the amount of links we have in this OP, but if we do have links and they are older surely they should only put the ones we discuss in so we can filter out the stuff people don't care about rather than this spam.
Chase Foster
we're going to have to put Brexit on hold and work with EU partners while these external threats are dealt with
Luis Lewis
Too many links fam
Eli Turner
People generally don't do that which is the point. Or you could use the date of the thread, it's a very odd way to catalog these events and OPs usually miss happenings and fast paced discussions due to them not being make at the same time as the event.
Jason Nguyen
Dating threads would be too logical smh
Dominic Thompson
No but there's one near work that's similar.
ian_smith_lets_have_some_standards.webm
>"I can post proof" At least every other thread has at least one user talk about an OP link. How the fuck does it stifle discussion in any way? How the fuck can the main links at the top of the thread go ignored? Stop chatting bollocks.
Except they do, which is why I post them in an OP. There are posters who only come on in the evening who'll have missed the earlier articles and discussions, this gives them the opportunity to see them as well. Stop making excuses for your own laziness.
It's more than the usual number of links, sure, but calling it spam is an exaggeration. You can easily skim through the headlines posted in less than a minute, to see if anything piques your interest.
Lad come on even you are cleverer than that. people complain about links being reposted etc. You mean like they are now? Let's see you back up that claim Then surely they should be filtered rather than spammed if they come home from work tired. Stop making excuses for your autism
Well you know what they say one mans spam is another mans effort post I was meaning when you search using the catalog, if it does work then links aren't needed for reference and if I'm wrong I've got an improvement.
Oliver Hughes
>"haha you didn't ask checkmate"
YOU ARE THE ONE WHO LAZILY REPOSTS THE PREVIOUS OP There hasn't been any complaints outside of that. In fact, those complaints fucking prove that people do read through the OP.
>"haha checkmate"
>"stop making excuses for your autism" I miss the days when "hurr autism" wasn't the only insult on the 'net.
Look at this thread no one is talking about any of the links To partially sate your autism that started an hour into the thread stop being disingenuous Putting so many rather than three or four good ones in is, it buries the more topical ones. Top argument there lad
Ryder Cruz
...
Asher Gonzalez
Fucking d r o p p e d before I even bothered, a shame since I was looking forward to it. At least we have the Paul movie coming out next week.
Juan Jackson
Fucking wew
Alexander Fisher
...
Parker Moore
That Francis really gets on my nerves sometimes. It's almost like he's not even Christian at all. smh lads it's a woman being good at things. I guess we've got to spread rumours about her for 2000 years now.
Jayden Lewis
Notice how these films are always popping up around Easter, when Christians celebrate Christ's resurrection.
Ryan Jackson
>directed by Garth Davis, who recently dorected (((Weinstein Company))) film 'Lion' hmmmmmm
WDH MBT
All you've done is made shit up, the only person agreeing with you is yourself, and your complaints are all about yourself and your lazy link reposting. "I don't read the OP therefore nobody does!", "no-one reads the OP but people complain if the OP links are reposted!", "no-one likes OP links but I'm the only person complaining about it!" Are you trying to win some esoteric "worst poster on the board" award.
The Paul film will be good.
Elijah Howard
They were such catty bitches in t'olden days
Ayden Bailey
Catholics aren't Christian, go to a Catholic Church and watch how they act with statues of Mary.
Joseph Bell
Holy shit is this a brainlet film
Kayden Flores
...
Matthew Davis
I know, lad. I probably should've included a :^) face, but I've been trying to wean myself off them lately. I use it way too often tbh.
Elijah Sullivan
...
Dylan Murphy
D:
Kevin Brooks
Can't see that link in the OP and even if it is it the post happens during the discussion, therefore is invalid. Anyway I've got to go to the shops but you can try to think up a new argument and hope it works better than your previous ones.
Blake Green
explain the incident between UK and Russia to me
regards serial idiot
Brayden Evans
counting down tbh
Josiah Lopez
He's been right on the nose today for a change :^)
Bentley Long
made up shit to enforce the artificial split between russia and the west
Jayden Evans
see
Jaxson Moore
Russian Austin Powers used some totally groovy powder on a double agent and now nothing significant will happen
Julian Barnes
You may feel he is right but sadly he can't reply to my points hence he is ignoring them.
Did a double-take at 0:53. It sounded like Nige was naming the jew right in the middle of of the european parliament. was a bit disappointed when I realised he said "the shoes".
*starts chewing spurdo gum to fight the cravings* :DDDDDD :DDD
Grayson Collins
May making shit up to cover up the aeful job she's made of Brexit.
Jack Bailey
If only *smacks lips* there was some sort of *shuffles about* medium, like the OP *grabs dick* where we posted links *makes rap album* to recent events *eats chicken wings* then discussed them.
Too bad we don't have anything like that on Zig Forums
Easton Howard
Holy shit he's onto something Smh maybe we should stop using the OP for boring relevant news hyperlinks and start posting links to current and topical affairs
William White
watch it you cunt
Brody Rivera
OH DO YOU MEAN LIKE RUSSIA? Guess what retard? filtered
Kayden Garcia
Wew, the mental gymnastics that some people put themselves through to justify their addictions…
