Your entire first point is exactly what everyone said leading up to the two gulf wars. America doesn't want to get their hands dirty with potential casualties, America's military industrial clusterfuck makes AH-64s that can't fly and M2/3 Bradlys that do nothing but explode, America couldn't fight nam' and they can't fight a real army like Iraq which is poised to take Europe and remove all babies from the incubators because longnose tribe said so!
The second point I really don't quite understand what point you're trying to make. CIA niggers using moderate beheading videos were able to get Assad on his knees, weeks before being wiped out, until Russia staged a direct intervention. So what makes you think that Iran up against NATO would stand any chance against regulars with likely no direct Russian intervention?
Your third point is a total non-sequitur. The CIA niggers hiding their nigger tricks has nothing to do with the sandnigger top brass on both sides intentionally destroying all records of their failed campaigns to save face and turn around to do the same mistakes that got thousands killed in the last battle because they would have to admit they are wrong and would have to change their perfect tactics.
But the trench warfare was slowly changing again with the invention of the Tank and the slow adoption of infantry automatics like the MP-18 and Pederson device. But by the time such devices and the proper tactics for them were discovered, the war was over. Iran and Iraq had all of armored warfare history, the closing stages of WW1, the north African campaign of WW2, the fall of France, Barbarosa, Kursk, the Normandy breakout and battle of Arracourt, and even the seven day's war and NVA Vs AVRN tank engagements in nam' to learn from. And yet they didn't learn a god damn thing and did WW1 all over again with shit tactics because they are like Chinks and beyond learning from history.
I think taking precedence from history is impossible to not do because its all been literally said before.
Iraq supposedly had the best of the best the USSR had to offer and the US was coming at them with M60s from well, the 60s. That being said, when has Iran gotten an equipment upgrade? We know they have definitely run out of F-14 parts by now as no one has seem them flying around recently. I doubt they have parts for their M60 tanks ether.
US morale and confidence was in the gutter in the first gulf war too. All the TV talking heads were saying they were put there to be a speedbump for Saddam and none of their equipment would work. And with the totally unexpected curbstomping that was given I find it hard to believe that Iran would fare any better.
The rest of NATO won't make a difference. They pretty much only exist to get all the press, use our ammo and fuel and be targets for hot dogging A-10 pilots who can't tell the difference between a warrior and a fucking BMP.
Attached: 800px-DM-SC-92-03658.jpg (800x518, 96.88K)