Why isn't 1 Enoch canon in most churches?

It has the clearest prediction of Jesus I've ever seen, and it was written HUNDREDS of years before Jesus was even born.

Attached: 1515535471842.jpg (627x1012, 217.04K)

really makes you think

It really does. In Genesis Enoch is mentioned as the first ever person to be raised to Heaven without dying, a privilege that wasn't even afforded to Noah or Abraham. Genesis gives no explanation as to why that was, 1 Enoch fills that gap and explains why Enoch was special enough to be raised bodily into Heaven. 1 Enoch is also quoted several times in the New Testament, even by Jesus, the epistle of Jude is heavily influenced by it. The rejection of 1 Enoch as inspired scripture is simply bizarre given these facts.

Based Jay Dyer confirming nephilim being Human-Angel rapebabies

A book, supposedly written by the first guy to have been privileged to be assumed into Heaven, supposedly written before the Pentateuch, with information so delicate that we technically can build a whole world view from it, which supposedly hints towards Christ, even mentioned in Jude. Why is that not in Canon in the Church ? And more importantly: Why is it not in the Tanakh ? Imagine this incredibly important book, sparked from jewish tradition, yet the jews outright rejected it - older than the Pentateuch and important as it supposed to be ?
That doesn't make me think at all. We have enough in the current Canon - even in the butchered protestant bible - to contemplate and learn for several lifetimes. Who cares about a non-canonical book that is so obscure that it isn't even relevant for the jews.

It has awful theology, for one. In the so-called Book of Enoch, Enoch becomes an angel, which seems to be a Pharisaical fanfiction.

"Sorry God, we have enough revelation now, no need for any more, the Bible is long enough thanks"

Attached: 1444765935605.png (700x700, 362.43K)

"No God please give us everything at once, it's not like armies of exegets are still debating numerous verses and parts of the current Canon."
Despite the fact that who knows whether it was inspired or just
Or are you not aware why God reveals His Truth gradually ? Furthermore, if it was really that relevant or important, why did the Holy Spirit not intervene when the Canon was declared ? Who knows who knows.
For sure a random weeb on the internet.

I apologize for pulling the "muh weeb"-card. Rest stands tho.

This.
Who were they that went to look upon God in the tabernacle and burned to dust since they were yet impure to stand in His presence?