We discuss what he did wrong

This dude's kill score was dismal. What could he have done differently? Better training? Better guns? More than one gun a la Tarrant?

Attached: earnest.png (640x320, 250.19K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=f6fbzzaaOsA
heavy.com/news/2019/06/brian-clyde/
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

Planning probably. If he was actually inspired by Tarrant like he said, then that means he only spent like a month or two planning it all out. Contrast that to Brenton spending over a year planning christchurch.

He was a punk faggot who thought doing it would make him cool, and then as soon as he started he lost all testicular fortitude and ran away, allowed himself to be chased and shot at while not shooting back, then begged the cops to arrest him when they appeared. His first mistake was doing the attack at all. If you don't have the willpower or the belief, then you will not be able to psychologically commit yourself to violence and any attempts can only result in failure. The same mindset applies to self defense; you either absolutely believe that you have a responsibility to act in control or you'll be neglectful, forgetful, and worst of all a liability in a real confrontation. In that operation, Earnest was the liability, and that's why he failed.

That is all said regardless of whether or not I support what he did, though for the record, I don't. It was poorly planned, poorly executed, poorly thought out, and most importantly, utterly pointless because even if he killed every single person in that synagogue it would not have changed a damn thing about the cause that he was pretending to stick his neck out for. Random religious people aren't the cause of the demographic problem, it's politicians and legislators and trust fund holders. All he did was create more fuel for anti-gun, anti-male, anti-white rhetoric in public discourse, so overall it's a net loss.

Comparing the "earnest attempt" to Tarrant is like comparing an dirt patch on a mountain top with effigy planes and a straw control tower to an international airport. Its like he thought that the things that made Tarrant successful was having a meme soundtrack and a live stream and that's all it would take to pull off a successful attack. He neglected to take any real marksmanship training and didn't even get a fucking camera mount, if some sources are to be believed he tried shooting in one hand and holding his phone out in the other like his bullets would be guided by allah or some shit. It really was just a cargo cult trying to be a real airport without knowing fuck all about anything.

Tbh he fucked up in pretty much every aspect.
Shit happens.

The biggest obstacle to an analysis of Earnest's actions is that, as far as I'm aware, we still do not have a factual synopsis of what took place. We're working on mostly hearsay and whatever propagandized tidbits the media felt it was safe to release.

The biggest lesson to be learned is that, unless you're a durka-durka suicide bomber, zealotry is not a substitute for competence.

Where Bowers and Tarrant had the good sense to target places that were actually aiding/providing refuge for invaders Tarrant chose rando jewhouse #312
I saw his posts on /cow/. Kid actually thought he was going to usurp Paddock or something
Didn't even empty a single magazine before his gun jammed and he booked it.
Never once was he reported to have been seen at a gun range or shooting with family
nigger had fucking Pokemon songs, Imagine Dragons, and Breaking Benjamin playing

But as I've said before, despite all this zoomer's fuckups and mistakes he got what he wanted. I'm still seeing news reports in commiefornia about the poor jew lady and the rabbi's fingers. Also his manifesto was decent aside from the skyrim references.

Attached: 1556552667580.png (2518x1284, 168.22K)

I understand why you think so.
Because religious figures seem to be harmless and peaceful.
But this is the basic trick they use to confuse us.

Think for yourself, who is the most dangerous?
A Muzzie suicide bomber or the Imam who raised him?
A Jewish banker who uses usury to steal money from Gentiles, or a Rabbi who raised him?

When Jews and communists seized power in my country (Russia) in 1917, first of all they began to kill Christian priests, blow up churches and impose Marxist ideology as a new religion.
Secondly, they began to repress the military elite.
In third, they began to repress the intellectuals.

Tarrant was aware of this, and that is why he shot the mosque, but not the bazaar.

Nigger didn't prepare enough, that much is obvious.

I'd say his main problem wasn't even that he had no range time and a shit gun, but his utter lack of mental preparation.
His high score could've already been improved if, instead of running away, he'd have jumped into melee with a machete or a knife when his gun jammed, or, hell, just used the rifle as a club.