Was he right? do not delete, (m)olek.
Was he right? do not delete, (m)olek
Mason Thompson
Other urls found in this thread:
todayifoundout.com
twitter.com
Benjamin Jackson
Does this really need its own thread?
Thomas Cruz
No.
Luke Wood
yes, where else would it go? is this entire forum sanctified unto something? if so, why is it polluted with so much faggotry?
why not, friend? the observation resonates strongly with my experiences with churches. im still a born again believer, but what is wrong with his observation?
Cameron White
It's not the priest's fault that the man fell into sin.
Besides, sinning isn't the end. We're all called to repent after sin, even the priest in that story would have sins to repent of.
Besides, trust in the Lord is the only means of attaining peace in the soul.
This belonged in the questions thread.
Juan Morris
I like you already, heh.
If you don't mind sharing, I'd really like to hear about your experiences on church and your interpretation of the statement in the picture.
As for me, I think that Nietzsche uses an "argument" that's common among a lot of anti-theists today. This is basically where the assumption is made that a person will suffer and be miserable if they live up to the expectations that God has set for us. That's wrong. Everything that God has commanded us to do when we follow Him is due to his love for us. We see God as our father, yes? We are taught that God loves us and our relationship with him is that of a father and child. A father knows what's best for his child. The other side to this analysis is that part of the process of becoming closer to God might lead us to be ostracized by others. This doesn't mean that the values/morals we follow are wrong, though.
Luke White
bolek gave me permission to post it as its own thread so i dont want to question the decision of the mods chosen at tutor’s discretion.
i see your point though.
sure man. ive posted here before i used to be on the discord as “verity” but apparently im a notorious troll even though im not trolling.
i went to verity baptist church (andersonite church roger jimenez) and got kicked out.
before that i was atheist. i went to a catholic church once but my instincts kicked in, i read the bible a few times, and it was obvious the catholic church is not of God.
im more of a pete peters fan despite the fatal racialist viewpoints he espouses. i consider church my “congregation” of fellow believers when we talk bible. we talk doctrine and rebuke the papists and the 501c3 state-placaters.
Luis Davis
The QTDDTOT thread.
Camden Barnes
excuse me, ma’am, your concern has already been addressed by
sage.
Liam Gray
Nietzche was a glorified sophist, right down to the believing that there's no objective truth.
Landon Diaz
wheres the sophistry in the quote?
Brayden Ward
hes right because at that moment the convert became redpilled (aka breadpilled)
Owen Sanders
yes, but despite being redpilled, the source of his misery as a function of seeking relief from the misery itself became the “improver.” so what does my hypothetical brother in Christ serve by making as much of the community as possible my enemy?
William Cruz
Not in the quote. Just in general, Nietzsche was a sophist.
Tyler Foster
john the baptist’s baptism, was it of men or of God?
Grayson Anderson
full of hatred and ostracization doesn't necessarily follow. The person himself doesn't have to continue in his faith either so obviously he thinks its for the greater good or was misled. He seems to be advocating a 'ignorance is bliss' attitude hence the allusion to 'redpill'
David Allen
bump
Isaac Walker
Christian Watson
Masons and secret societies are work of satan, but why are you including Knights of Columbus there, it's a catholic organization
Andrew King
oh ok, didnt know he was mason.
Jacob Watson
todayifoundout.com
Masonry found its modern form around the same time as Napoleon. It's far more likely the salute was added to Freemasonry -after- they rediscovered the 600 B.C. custom of keeping one's arms inside a toga for dignity than the custom being pulled out from Freemasonry.
The reason, of course, is that there would be more intermediate examples (why no hand-in-waistcoat pictures from 300B.C. to 1600AD) of this sort -if- masonry had been quietly keeping the custom all along.
Much more likely it was a sudden fad which masonry then plopped into one of its degrees or, slightly less likely, coincidence.
Robert Morales
yeah but the mechanisms are the same, bonepart became irrelevant since 1913 when the conspirators and jekyll island executed the federal reserve act. its called MYSTERY babylon. you dont know who the individuals are they keep secret and blend in with you.
Luke Thompson
in daniels vision of nebuchadnezzars dream, the feet are iron mixed with clay.
the iron represents the kingdom of baal precipitated from babylon through the romans as picturing that aspect that feeds off of christians, the clay
and the clay, as the potters clay represents, are the sheep that either choose to believe Christ and reconcile to that Rock that eventually smashes the idol, or to be destroyed along with the irons that lived off of you along with the adversary represented by that composite idol.
Brody Butler
I'm sorry, I'm really having trouble making sense of this. It's an interesting idea but I'm not getting your point.
Alexander Harris
No.
Angel Jones
Dat pride.
Basically, he went to the doctor who found that he had a tumour, which the doctor diagnosed as cancer. The man then blames the doctor for "giving" him cancer and refuses to get appropriate treatment for it.
tl;dr - It's another "Nietzche wildly misunderstands Christianity" episode.
Dylan Sanders
op here. checked and saved. thank you. this pulled me out of a foul mood.
Parker Reyes
...
Wyatt Watson
With respect, that's how Nietzsche used to identify himself.
He hated German nationalism so much that he refused to consider himself a German at all, and would troll German nationalists by adamantly declaring that he was of noble Polish stock.
Aaron Bailey
Nietzsche tried to follow his own philosophy and he ended up having a pretty miserable life
Justin King
Nietzsche was right, the priest in the story wasn't right. Apparently this priest was a member of a heretical "church", so he was like the pharisees. He taught but had no means to heal the corrupted human nature.
People in the real Church (the Orthodox Church) are given grace. They improve themselves all the time. But at the same time God helps them be unaware of their improvements. When someone becomes haughty about some "achievements", then God takes away His grace and allows him to fall in a (carnal) sin. Therefore, the real Christians don't see their improvement but only their sins and so they never label other people as sinners. Nobody is ostracized as a sinner, unless he becomes a bad teacher who corrupts other people.
Cooper Sullivan
i agree.