How do you convince a normie that the Jews of today arnt in any way related to the Israelites and the Jews of the Old...

Well, are they Christ-killers, or not real Jews? Only one of them can be true.

Show the holocaust was a hoax and they peddle filth and war and their lineage won't matter

Most current day Jews are Khazars, Turks which settled North of the Caucasus and mass-converted to Judaism.

You don't.
The curses of Deuteronomy 28 dictate that after their fall, the Israelites will be seen as less than dirt. The Khazars may have stepped into the vacuum, but no amount of advocacy or argument can undo the Word of God. I actually see them as a divine distraction.

It's not for you to do anyways. The grand majority have become some of the most faithful Christians. "Turn your entire heart, mind, and soul" and whatnot.

Attached: 14.jpg (567x399, 65.14K)

The most important difference between modern Jews and the Jews of the Old Testament is that modern Jews are not Christian.

One tactic I like to pull on Zionist-Scofield Americanist boomers is to not call (them) Jews but always "Pharisees" or a group of them "Sanhedrin". And whenever it says "Jews" in a revisionist Bible when it shouldn't, saying "Israelites", "Hebrews", wherever it should (Interlinear).

Christianity came from the New Testament.

I wasn't alive when jews claimed the holocaust happened.
But watch them call me a nazi if I criticise them for their degenerate behavior.

Seriously, the Khazar theory is winnie the pooh retarded.
We have plenty of east euro Turkics, and they look nothing like jews.
Big noses and curly hair are the opposite of steppe genetics, for starters.
Also, most Israeli jews aren't even Ashkenazim, anyway.

Attached: Ногайцы_01.jpg (420x575, 43.33K)

have them read ACTS. that should convince them that the jews who didn't convert were some evil, anti-Christ bastards who were determined to stamp out the Church. Paul even mentions persecution by the jews in his epistles, until his martyrdom, every single stripe and beating Paul endured was at the hands of the JEWS, the same who are the physical and spiritual ancestors of the ones today. the Church endured decades of persecution by the jews before Rome ever martyred a single Christian.

and then refer them back to parables of Christ including the wicked husbandmen, the cursed fig tree, prodigal son, and numerous others which all have the implication of the jews being replaced by the gentiles.

after that, have them read Romans and the sections on adoption, and then Hebrews in order to see that Christianity is the fulfillment of 2nd Temple Judaism and that anyone holding on to the old worship is mistaken.

try calling them "canaanites."

that's what most of them are by breeding anyways, and that's what they are in terms of worship style, if they follow the talmud.

8ch.net/pol/res/11880125.html

The Canaanite label seems to piss them off the most. St. Simon of Trent and blood libel is more evidence that’s what they are.

new testament jews =/= old testament Israelites

They became mixed. And now most of them (>90%) and certainly the dominant breed, are what we could call eastern european nonchristians. The reason was for material gain and for other worldly benefits, but now they are truly members of the synagogue of satan.

Correction: Christianity came from the bible

Attached: image.jpeg (460x519, 126.42K)

No, Christianity started when God made the promise to Eve of a savior through Jesus Christ.

This is in reference to Jesus Christ. The original religion of the Israelites has ALWAYS been Christianity, Judaism has NOTHING to do with the bible.

Did you know that the animal sacrifices of OT do not absolve sins but served as a reminder to the Israelites of the price of sin? It was all in anticipation of the perfect sacrifice that Christ represents, this is proof that the bible is about Jesus Christ from start to finish and it's quite a beautiful fact.

Attached: Judaism is younger than Christianity (2).webm (320x240, 2.4M)