"Men Prefer Debt-Free Virgins Without Tattoos" is wrong and sinful. Is she right?

"Men Prefer Debt-Free Virgins Without Tattoos" is wrong and sinful. Is she right?
youtube.com/watch?v=ci3_R1uHIXw&app=desktop

Attached: 1532884214709.jpg (900x900, 97.42K)

lmao thots riled up

She needs to control her emotions. Even if she disagrees, why get so angry? Learn to harness anger, as you harness your tongue.

But I will say that GOING to college has become idolatrous, for both men and women. Do you have something you desperately want to learn more about, and you have a plan to use it to pay off the debt, or are you just going because you feel you should? Aeronautical maintenance, welding, and maritime engineering pay well, and a few semesters at your local community college will get you credentialed. College and career are vocations to be discerned - just going and taking on debt is not a good plan. Are you going for your ministry or your pride?

I will say this about children, there's a quote: "The future belongs to those who show up." If we don't love creation enough to want to bring others into it, why are we bothering? Do we love ourselves so much we won't even create new life? Also idolatry.

Purity culture has good elements but can also be idolatrous. Purity is an intent and mindset - a single mother isn't 'impure,' her sins may be just more public than some of ours. If she's putting her butt in the pew and living the faith, she's pure.

TFW no virgin wife who can cook for my kids WORKING ON IT

Trivial click-bait tier bullshit, didn't a woman herself post this? I don't think all the inferences she makes are accurate, the fact that "Men Prefer Debt-Free Virgins Without Tattoos" doesn't mean that these women who previously were engaged in the opposite are not able to be forgiven by God, but it also doesn't change the fact that yes, most men are likely to prefer those kinds of women, innocence and purity are always going to be appealing, whether to a righteous person to enjoy or a wicked person to defile. We are to work out our own salvation with fear and trembling. I for one enjoy women who are emotionally troubled with daddy issues blah blah blah, but you could say that is a problem of my own due to my own upbringing (rather than some sort of honourable heroic act) and even if that was my intention to do so, it would just be an exercise in ego.

This

...

why would men prefer non-virgins?
tattoos are a sign of degeneracy.
what world do these people live in where you just have endless flaps of cash and go around winnie the pooh as many people as possible?

i agree. "Well, user. you don't have a high school diploma. we can't hire you" gets old.

Attached: rosties_are_funny.webm (640x360, 8.57M)

Tells me this drag queen didn't read a single book.

She's a child in a woman's body, not mentally developed.

Don't get me wrong user, I only like a particular girl tbh, and as far as I know, she's a penetrative virgin.

Her video is filled with strawmans and autistic screeching. She never addressed what is written in the article.

Lmao I watched the entire thing and feel so bad for the dude who married her.

And I'm very thankful for my gf all the sudden.

Oh no men are holding women to the same standard as women hold men. Whatever shall we do?
Mind you, they don't mind the 50 women part, they mind the financial part.

Wasn't this chick one of the webms that the weird babtist guy used to dump?

Man I miss those

I *shamefully* saved most of them, but don't ask me to post them.

lol what is prudence

Satan has done a number western women

Attached: 85b009af3ce93cc2366ca48c13bb29268114fc92948de5f8c07bb88aa6573996.png (640x863, 207.68K)

...

Am I meant to be surprised? The emotional response should tell you that she's reacting because she's personally threatened, not that she simply disagrees

'The past is the past!', amirite?

Not sure what you're getting at

tl;dw woman cares about feminism more than Christ

It's like nobody here watched the video or took the time to understand what she said.

I watched it instead of simply assuming its content and she makes a good point. You should remain pure for your love of Christ who died for your sins on the cross and not for the promise of a husband, another fallen human being.
She's not advocating to "find yourself" and "lol it's ok you can winnie the pooh around God is gonna forgive you" she simply says that if you made a mistake don't winnie the pooh ruin your life into maximum sin mode because the church taught you that you were a bar of chocolate and once you get winnie the poohed you're ruined forever.

And that girl is a virgin (now married) so it's not like she felt personaly attacked as people claim.

That being said,
1)men prefer debt-free virgins without tatoos for good reasons
2)Be careful of "born again sluts", I've done shitty things in life and I know people can change so I'm willing to forgive and all, but be careful, nature isn't easily changed
3)Some girls might get her message wrongly and believe that fornication is "just another sin, I'm a christian for God and he's gonna forgive me anyway" (this is really perverse thinking, I've experienced it before)

TL;DR : You guys (and the woman who wrote the article) are right, but the girl in the video ain't wrong either.

Attached: Easy Lover ラヴァ (2).jpg (600x640, 308.49K)

Also this whole thread is really typical of 4chan culture: Digging up content to be offended and feeling a sense of security in yourself because you've got the higher ground unlike those degenerate, you're in the right man, you're the chosen one!
Which is true, if you're a real christian, doesn't mean you should inflate yourself with pride and contempt, especially against others christian who might be in the dark.

It's like imagining orthodox monks, or catholic saints, or whatever is your idea of a holy person, lurking 8ch and showing this board to their bros and instead of praying for us they'll be all like "Hey look at this bro, it's a "christian" imageboard but all they do is screech at controversial topics, talk about anime and fight each others about dumb shit"

Also in order not to make my post completely useless, here's a pdf of C.S Lewis' Mere christianity. A must-read and we can never say it enough.
Have a good day people.

Attached: the absolute state of this board.png (1229x439, 248.02K)

I've been a long time subscriber to her channel and normally her content is alright, but this video was too much and made me consider unsubbing tbh.
Literally just her autistically screeching at the camera, not even properly addressing the article in question. I also find it funny how literally every single criticism of the article she's talking about has been from other women. Not once have I seen a man admit that they would not prefer a 'debt free virgin without tatoos.' It's really only other women harping up with the crabs in a bucket mentality.

The thot is immunized by all dangers
One may call her a bitch, a degenerate, a fake Christian, it all runs off her like water off a raincoat
But call her a thot and you will be astonished at how she recoils, how injured she is, how she suddenly shrinks back: "I've been found out."

Attached: 534.jpg (692x1024, 289.41K)

Easier said than done, I to this day fell a deep anger inside me whenever people disagrees with me.
I've had good exposure to debates so I have reduced its intensity due to controlling my passions as a whole with prayer and fasting.
But it is a very common passion, I really can't imagine the common child or woman being able to control themselves to a good degree.

Everyone is so used to bad news from awful women, they're rather spare more horrific patterns of women letting everyone know that it's pointless to look for an authentic wife in the west.

Attached: final doom.jpg (960x640, 259.94K)

She seems to be conflating being saved with being a good catch and is outraged because she's not the second. Also aren't women not supposed to teach doctrine?

You're missing the point that she's railing against something that nobody said

Cool, but nobody said that so why did she make a 10 minute video against a strawman? Men DO prefer virgins without debt so women SHOULD protect their chastity until married. If we all agree on that point what is the point of this video screeching about something nobody even implied?

You're really stretching if you're trying to apply that in this case. But let's not derail this thread.

Yes. I have thought about this after I posted my reply and this is true. It would have been better if she simply made a general statement instead of an answer to this particular article.


One of the christian virtue is "hope"
Don't despair althought the world is pretty bleak right now.

Peace.

Attached: 630dabf13ac6123a876a09467298ae571f991b2db1656fe71b6229dcaf830041.jpg (1024x576, 218.57K)

God bless you, user.

Attached: seal.png (500x332, 207.58K)

You receive forgiveness by "living a life of repentance", so you cannot receive it overnight. Our natural instinct must therefore be not to forgive until we are sure somebody has repented, and then to forgive unconditionally. For a promiscuous women my measure would be 2 years of celibacy before I can believe that she has truly changed.
The "forgive overnight", and "be saved overnight" doctrines are results of Western so called Christianity, Catholic and Protestant alike. In Catholicism it's all about being a member of the club and everything is forgiven, while Protestants either forgive trivially or not at all. Thanks God I'm Orthodox. Become Orthodox.

Indeed.

Losing your virginity is forever, though. Once it's gone it's gone. You can be born again and forgiven, but you can't be a "born-again virgin" in the sense that you're magically a sexual virgin again. There's nothing wrong with marrying a genuinely repentant woman with a history, but you're absolutely kidding yourself if you think her history hasn't affected her in a very deep way that is extraordinarily difficult to alter or undo.

The solution for women is very simple but they just do not listen. Not the fault of men, unless you think men should be rising up in revolution to overthrow the government and kill any enforcement of feminism.

Who doesn't?

Christ himself said that you can divorce women who committed adultery (Matthew 19:9). Screw your modernist garbage.

Hello CIA, I officially disavow the statement this poster I am replying to made.

THIS JUST IN: PEOPLE PREFER COKE CANS UNOPENED BEFORE DRINKING

This is your brain on cowardice.

Attached: 606px-Le_Grand_Saint_Michel,_by_Raffaello_Sanzio,_from_C2RMF_retouched.jpg (606x1024, 157.56K)

She is literally condemning people's teachings in terms of doctrinal error. If she restrained herself to ranting on about how such teachings are emotionally damaging and unempowering to women that'd be different but when she starts busting out the legalism card it's bang to right what she's doing.

porneia means marriages that were illicit to begin with, you're still in adultery if you divorce

otherwise, there is zero practical difference between the mosaic law of divorce and the Christian

absolutely TOASTY

Attached: 1531783908406.jpg (400x501, 17.84K)

she has that kind of attitude that I see in all leftist feminist women (my brother married one so I should know), hence I am not going to waste my time watching this video.
What really pisses me off is that she's kind of cute, how awful it is that there is a man out there who is deprived of virgin wholesome qts that instead become feminazis (same goes for women being deprived of real, upright men but this thread isn't about a man).

Has anyone figured out what sort of cucked-out church she's a part of so that I can stay as far away from it as possible?

She just a dumb thot who got convicted by a truthful article.