No. The battle of Lepanto, of Viena, of Tours, several crusades ( No, they didn't all fail ). Catholicsim has also produced amazing civilizations also, like Brazil before it fell to modernism and degeneracy ( mostly due to the republic ), the only difference is, they didn't think that working was the best virtue in the world and didn't sacrifice to mammon. I recognize orthodoxy for fighting again'st islam, and i love them for it, but their kingdoms ultimelly fell to islam in 1453 and to the jews in 1918.
16th century
Robert Wilson
Gabriel Hughes
A defensive action, also a failure.
A defensive action.
1 succeeded against the Muslims. The rest failed. And in fact, that one Crusade functioned more as a titanic waste of time and manpower, when there were White European peoples and land, right winnie the pooh there, in Spain, that needed to be liberated. There were still some left.
Are you retarded? Brazil? Amazing? Ahahahahahahahahahaha
Yes, a bunch of lazy shitskins and tiggers who achieved nothing but replicating Rome's failure and shitting up their bloodlines. From Mexico to Argentina, with only Chile as an exception, the entirety of Catholic management. Resulted in failure after failure. Centuries headstart, and still decades behind.
Catholicism naturally attracts the stupid, corrupt and lazy.
Gee, I wonder how that happened, couldnt have had anything to do with Catholic treason, could it?
The occupation of the Balkans was heavily assisted by Catholic treason. Its almost as if the onoy successful defenses against Islam by Cathloic forces occured despite Rome, not because of it. Its almost as if the shitskins of the Pope were heavily interesting in shitting up Europe.
Yeah. And yet look how those Communists behaved after WWII. They never flooded their lands with Turks or shitskins and the Muslims kept their goddamned mouths shut. Hell, Bulgaria was on its way to ethnically cleansing Islam.
Even Russian Kike Communists were better than Catholicism.
Luis Long
really made me think
Matthew Green
No, more than one crusade succeced, even if you count the ''capture jerusalem' objetive as the sole factor of win or loss.
Brazil was great as an empire, and was reaching europe tier when it ended. It had and still has a hard working honest population, don't let others fool you, most people here are trying to feed their family in an honest way.
We don't know what could have happened if they were under the spanish crown, but these countries succumbed to masonic revolutionary republicanism, even Mexico had two empires before it was destroyed by godless revolutionaries .
My point is, these countries that you so highly of, fell nonetheless, at least rome never fell to muslim rule ( PROTIP: Catholics didn't let them, while hagia sophia became a mosque youtube.com
Lmao they massacred orthodox serbians, opressed religious people of all kinds ( specially orthodox christians ), destroyed churches and persecuted them, and are still better than catholics? good one betraying your catholic apostolic brothers in christ.
Angel Phillips
Disgusting relativism
Isaiah Sanders
Except a lot of modernist churches seek only to dismantle themselves entirely and give it all to the poor, which helps no one
David Davis
All of those sects were heretical by all major Christian denominarions, so who cares? There was uniformity after the reformation; most of the Reformers were a variant of Calvinism. That is, they believed in predestination to salvation, regulator principle of worship, iconoclasm, etc.