Foreign Enemies Plan To Invade America, What You Need To Know

BE PREPARED: >>>/prepare/1 | archive.fo/elYwR
https:// web.archive.org/web/20180910185746/https:// 8ch.net/prepare/res/1.html

Not since the War of 1812 has the United States faced the possibility of being militarily invaded. Can such an invasion succeed? What are the variables involved? This is a the first of a multi-part series which will address the topics of a military invasion and subsequent occupation.

American Forces Training to be Invaded

As I was driving on Interstate 8, about 60 miles east of Yuma, AZ., on Monday, I witnessed about 100 American troops who had established a temporary base right next to the border. I do have photos but I am running them by an expert before I release them. When we stopped to take photos, we definitely garnered the attention and when real attention was paid to us, discretion became the better part of valor and we left the scene.

On the way out to San Diego, last Friday, located 20 miles east of Yuma, along the same stretch of highway, I witnessed portable radar devices that were operational and they were accompanied by around 30 troops living in tents, next to the border fence with Mexico.

I was relating my observations to a friend and he said he saw the exact same thing near Ajo, AZ, which is adjacent to the border as he entered Mexico several weeks ago.

Trump Moves to Fortify the Border

We know that President Trump has begun to fortify the border and the was reported here on the CSS in April of 2018. However, it quite another to see the military build up on our southern border. These are not training exercises, as I pointed out last April. These troops are not apprehending illegal aliens crossing the border. This is not a drug interdiction exercise. And given the fact that these same kinds of activities were going on in late July near Ajo, AZ, we can conclude that these troops are not merely training, their presence is taking on a sense of permanence. From my detailed description, I have been told by a reliable military source that these are advance units whose primary mission is surveillance and that more than likely armored columns and combat troops are housed in disguised locations nearby. An ex-military officer (ARSOF) told me “these are very well your Red Dawn defense troops that you have written about”. Initially, I thought my source was mocking me, but he was deadly serious.

I have two fundamental questions: (1) Could the United States be successfully invaded; and (2) Could the United States be successfully occupied?

My ARSOF source agreed to an anonymous interview on this topic, but refused to come on my radio show. The topic of our interview consisted of a discussion what it would be like to be invaded and occupied by a foreign military.

The Sheer Size of the Invasion Force

If NATO were to stand down and it was just Canada and United States, my source said it would take 100 million men to invade the United States. The Red Dawn route into the Southwest would be one preferred route. The Bering Strait entry into the United States would be another land route. However, a series of amphibious invasions would be required and that would be a daunting task if only convention weapons were to be used. Amphibious invasions are very difficult. However, American forces stationed around the world, in places like Africa, Syria, Iraq, and mostly in Afghanistan would be attacked to prevent re-deployment to the United States.

The feeling of my source is that it would take a combined force to attack the United States and that mostly likely would be China and Russia. However, it is possible that India would join in as well. Additionally, if America was fully intact, the task would be impossible. However, if America had been hit by a pandemic, an EMP, or was embroiled in a civil war, the job of invading the United States just got easier. Surprisingly, my source did not think the war would escalate to nuclear with the main reason being that there would be nothing left to occupy.
There has been one previous thread about this article.

Attached: Foreign Enemies Plan To Invade America, What You Need To Know.jpg (768x576, 58.29K)

Other urls found in this thread:

archive.fo/ugXa1
thecommonsenseshow.com/can-america-be-successfully-invaded-and-occupied/
archive.fo/6IWM3
thecommonsenseshow.com/could-america-ever-successfully-be-occupied-by-a-foreign-power/
freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3682764/posts
scribd.com/document/250231171/China-Friend-or-Foe
atrueott.wordpress.com
google.com/search?hl=en&q=IRS is a Fraud
myspace.
google.com/search?hl=en&q=911 Truth Movement
youtube.com/watch?v=klwWcp9eiPw&feature=related
cnbc.com/2018/10/24/trump-administration-has-not-settled-on-a-plan-for-what-to-do-if-the-migrant-caravan-arrives-at-the-us-border.html
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

The Challenges of Size and Geography

It would be nearly impossible for a foreign military to successfully invade the United States. There are a number of reasons why this is true. The land mass, alone, makes this a daunting task. The United States has the fourth largest land mass in the world, behind only China, Russia and Canada. Contained within the lower 48 states are formidable geographical obstacles to invasion. The America people, compared to the rest of the world, are fiercely independent. The population, an estimated 330 million known residents makes occupation a nightmare for a foreign military.

In order to occupy and garrison the United States, an invading power would need a unsustainable number of troops to control the citizenry. According to my source, there are only a couple of different ways that enough manpower could be generated.

Even if the United States could defeated militarily, the issue of occupation is huge.

One Hundred Million Minutemen

Somewhere around 100 million hundred Americans own 300 million guns. Thanks to Obama’s police state tactics, the number of firearms purchased by Americans increased exponentially.

The United States civilian population is the most heavily armed civilian population in history. America has seven million veterans. This is an army to be contended with.

Conventional wisdom states that it takes one soldier to effectively garrison 50 citizens. That means that a fully intact United States would require 6 million occupation troops, alone. And when one enters the number of guns owned by Americans, an occupation force would easily have to increase to 20 million. However, there is a caveat, these numbers are predicated on prisoners being taken and citizens being being occupied.

Deep State Collusion with Our Enemies

There is no question that the loony left wants to being an end to America as we know it. The Deep State is threatening elected representatives. There is total disdain for the American culture and the obvious desire of the left is destroy the Constitution. They will help the enemies of the United States.

After all, George Soros, a Jew, betrayed fellow Jews to the Nazis in WW II. Berandine Dorne and Bill Ayers supported North Vietnam and Castro’s Cuba. These were the two who launched Obama’s political career.

We have admitted MS-13, terrorists, drug cartel members and both Chinese and Russian troops. In retrospect, we have a significant 5th column which increases the odds of being conquered.

Conclusion

The task to take down the United States is daunting. Any invading force is going to need help from the inside and they are getting it from the Democratic Party. For the first time in history, there are elements of the Democratic Party that are actively engaged in treason. Previously, and on several occasions on the CSS, I have referenced Trevor Louden, former representative Cynthia McKinney and former Congressman Alan West who have all said that there 80 elected, Congressional Democrats who belong to front groups of the Muslim Brotherhood and the American Communist Party. Perhaps now, it makes more sense as to what the Kavanaugh nomination was really all about as these subversive behaviors of these communists were on full display for all to see.

The job of conquering America is difficult and occupation is even more difficult. Trump is to be commended for his work on the Space Force which he took away from the Air Force and it actively using the force to defend the United States. More on this in Part Two. However, there are other logistics to consider that can make this entirely possible and that will be the topic the next installment of The Common Sense Show.

archive.fo/ugXa1
thecommonsenseshow.com/can-america-be-successfully-invaded-and-occupied/

The Japanese never considered invading America after the attack upon Pearl Harbor because there “would be an American with a gun behind every blade of grass”. However, the Americans were able to successfully occupy post-World War II Japan. This begs the question, is the following quote, true or false, when it comes to the United States?

It would be nearly impossible for an outside power to successfully invade the United States. /or would it? What about the resolve of the people? What are the motivations at work here?

Imagine if you will, you are an American, the invaders are in your street, you have your rifle and enough ammo and your children are in the house with you and you have heard these stories telling that Dallas has been burned to the ground by the invaders for the example. All the men were killed and the women abused. You hear Chinese being yelled from down the street. Would most reasonable and sane people be willing to surrender? How would most people respond in this situation.

The sheer brutality of the Chinese military would eventually preclude any capitulation. There are some fates worse than death and torture and death is all an invading Chinese military would offer. Subsequently, the resistance level against the Chinese grow exponentially.

I recently interviewed a number ex-military personnel including a former ARSOF high ranking commander and the consensus is the same among all parties. If an when the Chinese invade, they will have a tiger by the tail.

The Logistics of Land Mass

From a military perspective, the land mass off the United States is an invading power would need boots on the ground. The US has 350 million residents, both legal and illegal, but only has an average population density of only 38 people per square kilometer. Subsequently, an invading army would have to contend with both a massive geographic challenges, but they also have to contend with a large population base.

The experts I spoke with stated that it would take a minimum of 6 million soldiers to garrison the country and some thought it would take as many as 20 million. China, or China and Russia could field and army that big, but the economic costs of doing so would negate any economic advantage associated with conquering and occupying the assets of the United States. In short, from an economic perspective, it would be cost prohibitive.

No country in the world has an army that big. China could field one if it had a need, but it is the only country with a sufficient population to field that many soldiers and with enough wealth to not immediately suffer a catastrophic economic collapse due to the immediate contraction of the labor market that fielding the army would cause.

The Logistics of Necessary for An Invading Army

China does not have the logistics capability to get their army to North America, much less keep it in the field there. Even if China did develop the logistics with the support of several other nations, occupying the US would be an absolute nightmare.

Guerrilla Warfare

The new conflict that would soon emerge in post-war defeat of American conventional military forces would greatly favor the use of guerrilla tactics. History demonstrated that the the size of the United States was one of the major factors in Washington’s defeat of the British during the Revolution.

The British commanders never came to terms with just how the land mass of America was, and in particular with the American wilderness. British generals had a difficult time grasping how hard it was to maneuver their own troops to where they were needed, and how hard it was to find the enemy troops to bring them to battle. In Washington’s case, he was only found when he wanted to be found and even when he was trapped like his army was in New York, local fisherman helped his army escape during the night. The same principles would hold true in modern day America.

Washington’s forces also demonstrated that the American rebels could fight at a time of their choosing and then disappear into the vast woods. This is exactly what was done to George Washington’s command during the French and Indian War when Washington commanded a British army. Washington learned his lessons well. By the way, I was told by the experts that Jade Helm 16 practiced for this eventuality as well. These tactics are still very much alive and well and ar a part of a post-defeat American military strategy.

Local Support for America’s Version of the Viet Cong

During the Vietnam War, defeating the enemy was not the real challenge. America failed to eliminate popular and covert support for an enemy that always lived on the edge of defeat. For the United States to have won the Vietnam War, virtual genocide would have to have been applied and even that would not have produced a guaranteed outcome. The Chinese, for example, would have no hesitation at employing genocidal tactics of occupation. However, the thinking of the group of experts that I spoke with is that these efforts would never be enough.

Once Washington figured out that he didn’t actually need to engage the British in a major battle and that the definition of victory would change to simply keep fighting, America would de-evolve into a century of revolution. The American insurgents would be supported by the local population. and that winning just meant keeping the American army intact and in the field, the war was all but won; it was just a matter of time before the impossible logistics of the situation would force the British out. It forced the American out of Vietnam. The only hope for an invading army would be to successfully set up a puppet government that put on a friendly fact to the conquered. One that would

The German Occupation of France In World War II

One theme occurred during the discussions that would favor an occupying force. If the invaders destroyed the American economy and US infrastructure, and then followed up with prolonged bombing of civilian targets and populations, a Chinese-controlled American, puppet government MIGHT convince the majority of the US to submit. However, the consensus was that development was highly unlikely.

Conclusion

The universal conclusion of whether a revolution could be successful rested on a few other factors. We have 100 million citizens that control 300 million guns. We have over seven million citizens who are veterans of fighting age and 4 times that many who are older but can still shoot straight. Although a an armed American populace cannot be counted on in combat operations, they would provide a logistic nightmare for an invading force.

The consensus of my sources was that it would far easier to destroy America from within, although it would take considerable time. Bribe the politicians, send in 5th column forces to create a permanent atmosphere of perpetual terrorism, fund opposition forces (eg George Soros organizations), undermine the education system and debase the currency. If I am not mistaken, this paragraph more accurately describes the present strategy being used to destroy America.

archive.fo/6IWM3
thecommonsenseshow.com/could-america-ever-successfully-be-occupied-by-a-foreign-power/

Interesting, who would band together to stand against the United States

freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3682764/posts

scribd.com/document/250231171/China-Friend-or-Foe

Evenmore startling was his open admission of an ongoing deliberate deception of the U.S.
with China portraying itself as a “peaceful business partner” while in reality actually planning to kill “one or two hundred million Americans.”

Nobody. This is clickbait garbage.

Yes, through sheer incompetence, messed up orders, delayed orders, or a number of things.

Nope not for long. America has more firepower per fighting age citizen than most countries. Any occupying force would lose to the guerilla fighting that would ensue. Not only that but Americans value their freedom and are willing to fight for it. Citizens of nanny states, or even corrupt useless states like Mexico, don't really have anything to fight for as there is no advantage to them or their family to fight or die for a corrupt nation that gives them nothing but lip service.

The only thing the occupying force could do (and would do) is execute citizens to punish the partisans, and that would only galvanize the Americans to fight harder.

This is a no-win situation for any occupier over time.

all sages negated