Commifornia Democrat wants to use nuclear weapons threat to disarm American citizens

‘Government has nukes’: Democrat congressman tells gun owners to disarm, or else

California Congressman with 2020 presidential aspirations Eric Swalwell has confirmed he favored confiscating guns and even had a ‘nuclear’ take on what the government would do if it faced resistance.
In an op-ed published Thursday in USA Today, Swalwell (D-California) proposed a $15 billion buyback program for “assault weapons,” as well as criminal prosecution of anyone who chooses to keep their guns.

“So basically Swalwell wants a war. Because that’s what you would get,” airborne veteran and gun pundit Joe Biggs commented on Twitter – to which Swalwell replied that the government would win such a war, because it has atomic weapons.

“And it would be a short war my friend. The government has nukes. Too many of them. But they’re legit,” the congressman wrote.

The California congressman isn’t hiding that he is calling for a gun confiscation program modeled after Australia, which in 1996 outlawed long guns and rounded up over 660,000 weapons. Most recent research indicates that American civilians own approximately 393 million guns.

Swalwell, who was just re-elected to a second term representing California’s 15th district, located in the San Francisco Bay area, gained fame as one of the more outspoken Democrat advocates of the “Trump colluded with Russia” conspiracy theory.

rt.com/usa/444219-swalwell-gun-confiscation-nukes/

Attached: 1542447111863.jpg (640x480, 30K)

Other urls found in this thread:

snopes.com/fact-check/eric-swalwell-gun-owners-nukes/
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

jeeze, he was Trolling
just like the big orange funny gu

Rep. Eric Swalwell, California Democrat, warned gun owners Friday that any fight over firearms would be “a short one,” because the federal government has an extensive cache of nuclear weapons.


Swalwell quickly insisted that his reference to the government's possession of nuclear weapons was intended as no more than a joke and emphasized that he was not warning gun owners about such a response to their (hypothetical) resistance to gun confiscation.

snopes.com/fact-check/eric-swalwell-gun-owners-nukes/

Attached: Capture.JPG (608x333, 42.17K)

Jerry's kids come to power.

Pelosi says millions will die if she doesn't get to be Speaker though we have seen her face and survived.

the only thing more boring than american politics is the paranoia which obsesses over it

Genuine question, why are Americans so fucking autistic about guns.
You faggots are like horse girls with them it's hilarious.

It's called having a system of checks and balances against a rogue government that does not serve the people. You wouldn't understand, right?

Nah I wouldn't understand because I don't frequently shit my pants in Walmart nor do I have mass shootings multiple times a month in my country lmao

T. Ahmed

lol that's some good trolling
you know what would be an epic troll? if like someone were to joke about lol like hypothetically ha terminating the terms of elected representatives who threatened citizens with nuclear weapons lol yeah right

Says the Amerimutt which actually has an immigration problem of spics and mudslimes while also having mass shootings every month lmao
White and proud as fuck that I don't live in your shithole.

One day you will find out. :(

You're not American, so you don't know what it is like to have freedom of speech and safe communities that protect themselves. When 90+% of my neighbors have guns; I feel VERY safe. Meanwhile, Americans are allowed to talk about what ever they want when ever they want to.

You know the saying, " You don't know what you've got till its already gone." That is going to be the Leftist Americans in 10 years.

Attached: 04e382dd3ddc2b3a5685cb8b2376511056572f3140455dc59511db7468652e04.jpg (992x656, 50.05K)

Attached: 90fbfa601f79f418a.png (638x480, 521.72K)

Just because somebody isn't a literal nazi like you doesn't mean they are a communist you absolute brainlet.

Helpful hint:

Being a heavy blue state and having brown people =/= having the means of production seized and private property abolished.

Attached: stormweenie factory.png (890x768, 271.04K)

Look, it all comes down to the bullshit coming out of and spread from San Francisco. Bitches want a socialist state that takes care of the lazy "artistic" types who want to dye the hair blue and fuck eachother on the street as a performance piece. These people advocate their misperception of the values of communism and they are far and away the most vocal people in the state, which means the government hears their voices first and most

t. Californian who has to admit the problems with his state

>(((Snopes))) defending a liberal's blatant damage control
Gee, how shocked am I?

Shut your dicktrap, Europoor.

Attached: 1519634413865.jpg (863x1024, 185.86K)

Being a heavy blue state and having brown people =/= having the means of production seized and private property abolished.

Attached: CAC.jpg (450x288, 18.71K)

It was!

gee wiz

are you that neptune guy?

The writing on the forehead was a real autistic artistic touch

=/= ≠ =

Attached: index.png (166x150, 1.82K)

=/= ≠ =

I was referring to you…brainlet

No surprise. Lieberals prefer to nuke their own citizens than the enemies of their citizens.

This is what happens when you elect a Demonkkkrat House of Representatives.

#MAGA!!!

Johnny Neptune Presents:

The most disturbing toilet plunger on earth

Photographed in the men's room of a Walmart today

Attached: IMG_20181120_175156.jpg (3456x4608, 2.88M)

It seems like this would be in the women's restroom instead

Attached: IMG_20181120_175159.jpg (3456x4608, 3.01M)

FUCK YOUR THREAD!!

Oh yeah, it's Johnny. He was just in the men's room to suck cock for crystal.

Because we're not all the way cucked by our government quite yet like y'all have been for a long long time now.

BS
That's Andy's bathroom.

He and wendy get back to back and sit on it

Venezuela tried that already and everyone down there (except the government) is STARVING TO DEATH!!

and like an idiot, you want to try that shit…AGAIN!!!!

So, according to RATIONAL FUCKING COMMON SENSE… WHY!!?!?!?! why would you want to do that AGAIN!?!? LIKE A FUCKWIT!

Evan?

Look litter feller, even if you manage to get defending yourself outlawed in the US that fat, purple-haired, landwhale is still never going to let you touch her cunt.

It's because they think the Constitution is this indelible perfect scripture that never changes in either content or interpretation of that content. They're either too stupid or deliberately ignore how the amendment process even works, and the fact that the interpretation of the Second Amendment is now radically different than it was when it was first written.

The reason it was made was because the founding fathers had a legitimate fear that a European power would commit a subtle takeover of the government, and slowly install a puppet state, effectively transforming the USA into a colony again. This gave the citizens a protection against this possibility, because the difficulty in amending the constitution (it requires very large majorities of the government AND the states to agree) means that any such puppet government could not legally disarm the public, so the threat of an armed uprising would keep it in check, as the number of citizens with guns would exceed the number of army soldiers with guns.

Of course, now this sort of thing is very unlikely unless you believe the conspiracy theories about Jews or communists or whatever. And since the government now controls tanks and fighter jets and submarines and battleships and nuclear weapons, one soldier is more powerful than thousands of citizens with guns. This means an armed uprising where the citizens overthrow a corrupt government is IMPOSSIBLE. That's all the dude in the OP was saying.

So then how come it's not checking and balancing the rogue government that's currently in power and clearly not serving the people (or, the government that WAS in power during Obama's tenure; pick your own side)? Because it seems completely useless if that's what it's supposed to be doing.

Tell me: what was the last mass-shooting committed by the federal government, that all these guns supposedly protect you from? The chance that the evil liberals are going to somehow take over the country by force is zero. The chance that one of your neighbors will lose his fucking marbles and decide to start shooting at the next family barbecue is not zero. Think about what you're saying. If all your neighbors had nuclear weapons under their beds, would you feel more or less safe?

Based and do it. World will be much better for sure.

1,135 killed in mass shootings.
6,791 people were murdered,
40,100 motor vehicle deaths

Priorities man….

People also say that Trump is Hitler. Suppose Trump really is Hitler, don't you want law abiding American citizens to be able to defend themselves in the event of a disaster?

Attached: Dumb.mp4 (640x480, 3.74M)

Do not paint the Devil on the wall…

MOOOOROOOOOOOOOOOOONNNNN!!!

I just hate it when motor vehicles deliberately kill people.

or maybe it's because they think the ideas behind it are worth defending?

The reason it was made was because the founding fathers had a legitimate fear that a European power would commit a subtle takeover of the government, and slowly install a puppet state…
god you fucking newfag
literally lurk moar

Waco

Wew fucking lad!
This literally happens daily, worldwide. Here too. Pay attention.

Study history..
Has a society ever improved after centralized governmental control confiscated all weapons from the common populace? Name one example.
I'm waiting..

Attached: BQ1J6jB.jpg (1000x745, 45.57K)

Only 2 nations seem to have complete firearms bans from the common populace
Japan and China

For an Internet know-it-all

You don't seem to know much.

Both seem to be doing ok lately

ok
Venezuela, but it went to shit because of socialism, not a firearm ban

We could also use some less politically slanted statistics on crime. If police are called to a crime scene - say a domestic violence call - and there is a gun anywhere on the premises, for example locked in a gun safe, then it goes down as "gun crime" even though the gun was not used in the crime. This misleading statistic is then used in the predicatable way. According to Gary Mauser (SFU) this quadruples the reported rate of "gun crime" or "gun violence". In 2013 actual gun violence only occurred in 0.5% of violent crimes. His report is available online.

Another point is that suicide is a crime. So if a gun is used to commit suicide then it becomes a crime gun. But this is clearly not what people think when they hear "crime gun". That's not to just make light of the problem of suicides but it is clearly a different problem than that of crimes committed with guns.

Like I said..
Wew Fucking Lad!
Japan's economy has been shit for decades, they have the most depressed isolated people on the planet, the highest suicide rate, and don't even get me started on the sickness and decay that is readily apparent in every fabric of their society. They are not the deservedly proud people they once were. Now their men are effeminate little fags hugging their anime pillows all alone, while their women have, quite arguably, some of the strangest sexual fetishes that have been seen since the fall of the Roman Empire (which happened shortly after the centralized government confiscated all the weapons from the common populace, I might remind you.)
I'm not even going to respond to your idiotic statement that you think China is doing ok. Literally, just go live there, and find out what a great bastion of freedom China is! I've actually lived in both of those countries, and I can assure you that I am very happy to be a gun owning American.

Attached: 8cdf657dab161ebd79789b7ce756996487fa1fd4aa2536f1117775034f4c5ea6.jpg (340x340, 67.8K)

I meant they should nuke muttmerica not take guns away.

Who is
You mean (((The THEY)))?
Nuke the most arable land on this planet, literally the breadbasket of the world?
I don't think so.

...

Another point is that we live is super safe society (excluding few shitholes full of niggers), and only hysterical beta fags (and women) worry about gun crime, which is slowly diminishing naturally all the time

China has slave labor and 1984 tier surveillance while japan only has the ban because america forced it on them, and it may very well change in 20 years time. You could have used aussieland but the crimes just changed method, not decreased.

bad example buddy. not the same guy arguing you, but americans really are the dumbest if they think they can rise up against a military that outspends the next 20 countries combined (or whatever ridiculous number that is) that won't stop the NRA from making you think you have a chance though, so they can keep making shekels from your gun collection.

there's so much wrong in this post, where to start?

japanese are killing themselves not because they are depressed over a bad economy. it's because they work like mad in what has been a booming economy since ww2. (where the fuck do you get decades of the opposite? learnhistory moron)
the ones hugging anime pillows are western wannabe japs.
i guess you also have no idea that china's economy was growing by DOUBLE digits for years and that's why they're the biggest economy now, surpassing the US. the middle class has grown by leaps and bounds, while in the US it has stagnated as the rich get richer and the middle class get poorer.
you haven't been paying attention.

You're not paying attention either if you haven't realized China is stagnating now.

You take Americans for cowards, you think they will not fight if push comes to shove, just because they are unlikely to win. Well, you're wrong

Exactly.

How else do people think we got on top of the economic food chain? Being cowards like those Canadians who ironically shit on American culture while asking Americans for protection like the other 50+ countries in the world?

you mean it went to shit because its a federal presidential republic like america

lol

What is it like, being this blinded by irrational hatred of the USA?

One of the other things not mentioned about owning guns, and is mentioned in the 2nd Amendment, is having an armed militia. What this ultimately means is that anyone who would dare attack the USA would have a prolonged ground war against an armed population. A Japanese general was quoted as saying "Behind every blade of grass is a rifle" when asked why he did not support a plan for attacking mainland USA.

In short, no one would ever want to invade the USA as long as we have guns.

If you nuke the USA, btw, then you still get nothing from it, a side from nuclear holocaust. Hence that's not a good alternative neither.

Attached: FB_IMG_1532950879898.jpg (749x528, 26.11K)

I would just drop a neutron bomb

And lose the civilian population you'd likely be trying to control? All living things dead, too. You'd get crumbling cities with inhospitable wasteland.

Again, it stresses the contingency against INVASION. Total annihilation is a different story, but at that point the gun argument is out the window regardless. For using WMDs, you basically get to start, watch, and suffer from a nuclear exchange.

In short, as said, a bad alternative regardless.

Who do you think members of the military and police forces consist of?
That's right. Middle class, blue collar American workers, who almost all own gun collections of their own, as do many of their friends and families. Just who exactly is going to go house to house on these confiscation raids? UN troops?

Your threads are so banal. Consider suicide.

This is mostly true. Having been military and now law enforcement, I've noticed that most uniformed services (even EMTs and fire departments) are generally right with g. Sure, there are some exceptions, but said exceptions aren't the norm. If the US government made firearms illegal, much if the military would refuse to act on it, aside from possibly declaring the government tyrannical and enacting a coup to get said government back in the standards of the Constitution. Remember: American forces swear to uphold and protect the Constitution before following the orders of the President and protecting the American people. Upholding and protecting the Constitution is top priority.

Right wing*

Typing on my phone sucks, but no internet here for my laptop.

A Neutron bomb may be dropped here sooner than you think.
Also, what would you do with yourself once you could no longer shitpost? 8ch servers would go down, as would pretty much most of the internet. Your anime collection and fleshlight won't keep you occupied for long..

Attached: JN Is da Bomb.jpg (450x271, 37.9K)

you have to be trolling?

Current Dem strategy is to cry about guns but not to actually do anything to fix the problem, because that would take away one of their main fund raising scare monger subjects.


To every moron saying our air power and technolgical edge would make it easy to subjgate the US population: Ever heard of the Viet Cong? Aren't we still fighting talliban?


if people in black pjs can resist effectivly think about rednecks with moun tain dew and dip. think about how the general us popultion is chock full of veterans. there are morew trained ex military than there are current military.

Land of the Free, Home of the Brave.

Attached: benos dias arroz aghircola.jpg (600x463, 71.71K)

This. So much this.
My cop and military friends who often go target practicing and hunting with me say exactly this. Besides it being unconstitutional to use the US military against US citizens right here in our own country just for exercising their God-given rights to protect themselves, their friends and family from any threats – a natural human right that also happens to be upheld by the Constitution.

WEW I was worried. Thanks Snopes!

Attached: 20180527_232657.jpg (254x254, 49.18K)

That's right, folks!
The right to keep and bear arms was not granted to you by any constitution! You were born with that right, as a human, no matter what country you live in, no matter what restrictive governmental controls you and your people are choosing to live under. Chafe at the yoke if you must.
I choose to live FREE.
The Constitution guarantees the rights I already have. The right to protect oneself, one's family, one's friends, the weak, and those who cannot or will not defend themselves. What is the alternative? To pay taxes to a centralized government, begging them to rule over you and make all kinds of statutes and infractions that they can charge you with and threaten to imprison or kill you with their enforcement arm of government if you do not obey all their made up bullshit?
I say we make it simple and go back to following nothing but common law:
Don't purposely injure others or take their shit.
Unfortunately, that is exactly exactly the very law (the only true law) that government and their enforcement hordes enact upon all of us every day.
If only we taught respect and decency in the schools.. Alas..

Attached: b818989833903d748986ce02caf8778d.jpg (564x501, 34.42K)

I meant disobey, or rather, government breaks the only true law.

Don't worry folks!
I was just joking!
Nuclear bombs! Ha! Ha! Ha! I was only trolling. The government would never do that, sillies!
We're just going to confiscate all your guns!
All guns from law abiding citizens must be confiscated so that the criminals won't have to work so hard. It's like giving these poor folk a pay raise! Everybody likes pay raises, don't they? Well, criminals do to.
You know, these government types sound more like criminals each and every day.
From my cold dead hands…

*too

Is this thread the 'Trump declares war on the Colombian Cocoa Cartel' thread?

(lol @ just make Trump never mentioning that the Pentagon absolutely refused his request to use Force down at the border, call 800-7409 saying it was a violation of the Constitution to use the military for Law Enforcement purposes, AND they're beginning to pull the troops back from the border immediately…. Isn't that ironic?)

If this IS the Colombian Cocoa Cartel thread, I think it's a good thing because the Colombians make the worst fucking hot cocoa on Earth…..

GOD DAMN !!!

THAT WAS THE WORST CASE OF SPEECH TO TEXT TYPOS IVE EVER EXPERIENCED !!!

FUCK YOU…. I DONT CARE IF YOU UNDERSTOOD ME OR NOT

No.
This is the Kitty Cartel thread..

Attached: Kitty Cartel.jpg (400x267, 44.23K)

...

By the way, Roland Gift is an old friend of mine. I painted an Elvis for him back in the day.

They were a GREAT band

Attached: Demon Eeyore.jpg (421x376, 37.83K)

If you don't like them, you can EAT MY SHIT

Lol

Attached: PicsArt_11-21-05.35.15.jpg (1209x1080, 161.55K)

...

If you don't realize HOW amazing Elvis is, then fuck yourself

I used to think nukes were real until Swellmouth confirmed they are now I'm no longer fooled and besides we know that if nukes were really real these lunatics would have nuked the entire world long ago.

He likes to play fetch for hours every day with his toys – a skunk, a monkey and a shark. He also tears up any magazines or paper into tiny pieces. I have some excellent pics of him tearing apart religious magazines, but I'll save them for next week when Killcen returns..

Attached: U want to play w mee.jpg (1161x1805, 337K)

THE single most powerful live vocal demonstration ever.

Spellbinding


HAPPY HOLIDAYS from ELVIS

Ahahaha, you nailed it!

Rocket Cosmo and Sputnik have all become fascinated with tearing paper things up….

Anything made out of paper or cardboard… It doesn't stand a chance against them….

What's ironic is how you mentioned the toys, because although shark was never part of the equation, Wendy and I I've always said for some reason rock it reminds us of a mixture between a monkey and a skunk

Cats are fucking AMAZING

Pelosi says if she can't be Speaker millions will die though we have seen her face and survived so exactly how is a nuke going to kill us?

OP HERE…..

I would greatly appreciate it if you would stay on topic, and we're talking about cats and Elvis and cocoa mix…

Thank you for your cooperation, fuck face

No one on the pro-gun side does this. The issue isn't the amendment process, it's the fact that the anti-gun lobby is quite bluntly trying to circumnavigate it. If it is the case that America agrees it would be safer without its guns then the process exists within the constitution to amend the constitution. Any and every American is invited, in fact if you believe strongly enough you are in fact morally obligated, to initiate the process.

The facts are however the majority of the United States opposes the motion to disarm.


It's fairly explicit. The right to keep and bear arms is all it states. It makes no distinction between battle axes and swords, or tactical nukes. I mean you could, and it has been, argue that banning private machine gun ownership is a blatant abuse of state power (it is).

As it slowly slides out of my hairy crusty asshole…..

Deepthroat it, then eat it

...

Nofunz faggots keep saying this, but obvioulsy those who want to enforce their nofunz faggotry feel otherwise, or they wouldn't be trying to boil the frog. They are slowly eroding the Second Amendment, rather than assaulting it outright, because they know that they CANNOT win in a stand-up fight.

This toilet plunger reminded me of you

Attached: IMG_20181120_175156.jpg (3456x4608, 2.88M)

not even joking

Attached: IMG_20181120_175159.jpg (3456x4608, 3.01M)

Shut your mouf you dog eating yellow nigger.

If you squatted over this correctly and stuck it into a clogged toilet, you could plunge three holes at once, you fucking worthless piece of shit

Attached: IMG_20181121_181215.jpg (1078x1107, 275.97K)

You Rootin' Tootin' Sidewindin' Scalawag Bitch

Attached: dr-rooter-plungers-301688-64_1000.jpg (1000x1000, 52.13K)