this is getting more than the petition to reverse bexit btw
That's not contradictory though, lad
I wont disagree with that.
the Lords isn't exactly democratic, and I dont think fascism is anti-democratic
yeh. What of it?
Bit hypocritical, isn't it?
not really >Ideas in a void have never appealed to me; action must follow thought or political life is meaningless.
May as well try to make what we're presented with work for us.
No, losing by not using any means necessary is not principled, lad. It is the current system so we have to use it, whatever we'd want in our idealistic society isn't possible until we get there. smh
Sounds like an argument for letting BASED brown guys advocate for British nationalism tbh
Better that than advocating against it.
Not sure if I agree, lad
No, because I think that's a losing strategy. Are you just against trying to get anything done in the current democratic system and just waiting for some kind of collapse, lad?
i think a lot of posters OTB have succumbed to the accelerationistblackpill tbh
I respect the House of Lords as an undemocratic instiution, and am against the comeplete erasure of it just because it currently stands against us. Same could be said for much of the authoritarian instruments that currently exist tbh. Besides, we're past the point of being able to vote our way out of the situation.
but the whole idead is to create a NEW PARLIAMENTARY MACHINE tho. Once you start picking it apart the general public sees that things can affect change and become more susceptible to further change. i'd rather accelerate with reform than collapse tbh
Fair play tbh. I wouldn't hold my breath for an ethno-nationalist party to arise and get anywhere in the next five or so years.
Sorry lad I'm not sure I understand what you mean.
I kind of wish the daftie spies (Nick Lowles, Hope not Hate, Gerry Gable, Searchlight Magazine) in the pan-scandinavian nordfront could just do regular local politics instead smh. I still haven't checked out one of their events.
Awful bigot. Doesn't he know that she has descended from immigrants who arrived one or two generations ago? What gives someone with a family that lived in Britain for many centuries the right to deny the identity bestowed to me by BBC Teach.
I take it this is from leddit or something GET ENOCH TO THE TOP
It's more that colonialism isn't a justification and there isn't some grand moral scales that have to be balanced. Our colonial legacy being ours is not something that foreigners get to beat us over the head with, especially when every day our forefathers are being proven ever more right about how fucking inferior they actually are. Plus when has one group of people ever done anything that expressly helps and outgroup apart from now in the fucking topsyturvy land that is modernity? We did what was good for ourselves historically and anyone pointing that out should be responded to with "yeah, so what?".
You'd be hard-pressed to find someone who actually agrees with this bollocks offline. Some will get pressured into it, but really no-one looks at a wog and goes "he's from Birmingham, he's just like me!"
Oh I know lad, but if they want to play silly buggers then we'll play silly buggers.
Only in the places she lived probably. She might as well advocate abandoning self defence because she's found life without violence better for those who drifted through elite schools spaces, to elite university spaces, to meeting writing newspaper columns for The Guardian about meeting royalty.
No one keeps these delusions if they live in the real world and are stuck living in poorer areas of the UK regardless of how they are transformed.