IPFS-based Imageboard

Can't be arsed to check the code, is this true? Can you post file/line numbers?

Currently IPNS names are slow to resolve, so there's a basic resolver there to speed things up for now. It's not necessary, the server can be switched off and the client would automatically failover to IPNS proper, but page load times would be around a minute. It'll be deprecated once either IPFS' pubsub or p2p systems pick up js-ipfs-api support.

In any case, all I get now is a "loading..." page and that's it.

that's what I got when I didn't launch with the daemon with the --writable flag. Did you do this? I've been having more problems just with not being able to post anything. Like anything at all.

Try refreshing again; I just restarted the post auth server.

No scrap that, I think my latest client update broke the federation. It's because I thought adding webm support to the running site would be a good idea, I'll fix it later today.

if we're going to develop new imageboard software I think that it's absolutely critical that we create a new system for moderation. The current one is extremely out of date and extremely susceptible to infiltration and subversion. If we move to 0chan, or smugchan, or some other imageboard we have absolutely no idea who the admin is or if they're trustworthy.

I would propose a subscription based moderation system where anons can decide who gets to moderate for them. However we also can't let mods namefag since that would be a massive opportunity for [email protected], thus when you sign up to be a mod you should be assigned something like a random string of 10 letters and numbers, it's a bit difficult to namefag as 235j4ns3e3. We regrettably need mods because of spam and CP but we should disempower them as much as possible to prevent co-option and subversion.

Attached: Red Anon2.png (800x883, 140.23K)

but who would do it for free?

Fuck off back to promisedchan

user there's always someone who will do it for free.

Always