GPLv3 ensures all users have their essential freedoms in software. There's nothing crippled about using this license.
Of course this world is fucked
Hunter Taylor
Jaxson Richardson
GPLv3 is the Turner Diaries of Open Source Licenses. It is not getting things done.
Zachary Wood
What did you mean by this?
Jayden Moore
Let's not derail and argue about licenses. OP already said that everything was open source as in free software.
Kevin Gonzalez
You have been brainwashed by Google.
Christian Rivera
WHY IS IT ALWAYS CUTE GIRLS DRAWING THINGS?
WHY IS IT NEVER CUTE GIRLS PROGRAMMING?
REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
Samuel Gutierrez
you are a sexist shitlord you know that
Asher King
And basically anyone who is interested in writing engines for money is fucked, because their code cannot be sold. This is why GPL shouldn't be forced on everyone- it denies developers the ability to own their code. If your product is just code, you can't sell it or own it, it belongs to (((everybody))) now.
Why is a work of art and music reserved and owned by its creator, but not code? If we applied the GPL idea to art, then artists would have no intellectual property rights to their art, and anyone would be able to sell anyone else's art. Yet, only software gets this treatment. Why?
This isn't really a comment about whether you can read the code or not- it's about how FOSS denies ownership of the code. You can still own the code you write while letting others read it.
Bentley Long
Most artists can't program and most programmers can't draw.
Colton Jones
Kobayashi-san programs at her wagecuck job.