Defend BSD licenses

cs.vu.nl/~ast/intel/

How muck cuckness is in Yous? Using your work, not giving you any credit, nothing, just a huge corporate dick in your ass and life-long burden for enslaving computing for at least decade or so.

Attached: cuck-tan.png (300x233, 53.22K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=kXwhaTpa3j4
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

that's the problem with cucks, they want to know when their wife gets fucked

old news

They only thing that might be defensible in the BSD is....
Actually I don't have anything that comes to mind.

You're confusing some rich academic crying over not getting a thank you note and pathetic people who literally work for positive social feedback.

getting really tired of your shit

Can you apply LGPL to any piece of software or is it exclusive to libraries?

I was just thinking about this today. If they used GPL code we the users could pressure Intel by suing them to release the code which would help us reverse engineer (in private) and completely disable the botnet. It is not just some academic corporate cocksucker that got cucked, we all did. Serves me right for buying Intel. Can't wait for some CPU based on RISC-V. Where are chinks when you need them?

Can FSF and "relicensing to future versions" bullshit be removed from the GPL? If not, then cry me a river.

Licenses are just (digital) pieces of paper that mean nothing if you lack power to enforce them.


Selling emulator handhelds chock full of GPL- and CCNA-licensed code (and proprietary game ROMs), without giving a fuck about your ideas about copyright.