Why is there no good picture of the sun from space?

I'm looking for a wallpaper but every picture has reflections, out-of-focus light points (called bokeh apparently) and parts of hardware in it. Certainly there must be a good picture of the sun, as it would appear to the naked eye from space, somewhere.

Attached: main-qimg-806b80baf1d99227843e340aa4f9a3ba-c.jpg (1024x680, 50.85K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/ZFIn708ssFg
nasa.gov/content/goddard/how-sdo-sees-the-sun
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_Dynamics_Observatory
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

Same reason why we never been again on the moon, and why there are strange glitches with NASA videos.
>youtu.be/ZFIn708ssFg

There is an absolute shedload of pictures of the sun, taken from space. I believe they use the infrared section of the spectrum because the sun is pretty bright iirc. Fucking google it

...

I think infowars is shit but this is ironically a better explanation of the current world than most thinkers can come up with on weed.

No he means there's no "good" pictures as in pictures he can use as a desktop wallpaper. There are pictures alright, but they're shit.

Same reason you can't stare at the sun, its very bright!

When you aim a CCD at the sun it dials home to the CIA and streams your consciousness to a box not unlike the one in Ghostbusters. They literally own your past, present, and future thoughts even after you die.

Have you come to grips with the universe and how its features perceivable by your brain are represented therein by your senses? Are you satisfied with how """light""" is implemented as a universal carrier of information, and how the information carried by it is represented in your sensory systems?

Why is the frequency band our retinas are sensitive to so narrow anyway? The frequency on one end is just about twice the other end, compared to sound it's as if you could hear tones just about an octave apart (which wouldn't be much, would it). Why doesn't our sight extend well into the ranges we call infrared and ultraviolet? Are our brains too slow to represent a much wider frequency range with the same resolution (i.e. approximately the the same number of subjective "colors" within a given bandwidth)?