I think it's the opposite. Wikipedo only shows experimental support for FreeBSD.
Best filesystem coming through
ahh. Maybe that's why I just stick to ext.
XFS is a remnant of SGI's IRIX. That's how fucking old it is. In Moronix benchmark tests, it is faster than Ext4, but it's a dinosaur. I prefer being able to grow and shrink my partitions and not having to worry about defragmenting my hard drives. This is why I would go out of my way to select EXT4 if XFS was default.
My biggest problem with XFS so far has been the number of programs (including GCC) that cannot cope with inode64. That is a major pain in the ass, especially when running gaymes in Wine.
XFS still has fragmentation issues? Weird. I thought that was solved with journaling et al.
ext3 is fine
FAT is fine
just buy moar disk
FAT can't handle really large files.
The reference implementation can't. The reason FAT is the choice FS in embedded applications is because it's so barebones that there's little overhead and OEMs can just slap higher-level extensions on top of it.
I don't have any choice but to accept.