Waterfox no longer respects your privacy!

I might consider that

That's what you get for using some meme browser nobody uses. Use Chrome or Firefox. Anything else and you're just asking for it.

You're a strong argument for legalizing euthanasia.

Exactly. The only sites inaccessible using Tor under strictest settings require JavaScript or use Cloudflare, both of which is a solid indicator that nothing of value is being lost.

The only time you shouldn't use TOR is if you're doing online banking or stock trading and shit like that, because of the potential for MITM attacks.

Otherwise TOR everywhere.

You do realize everyone who uses Tor even once gets on a list?

What kind of list?

904432
It's Tor, not TOR, and you are correct, but not:

But, rather, because there's no point in using an anonymity network when accessing services that are tied to your real identity anyway, like your bank account.

Unless a Tor user is dumb enough to accept a self-signed cert created by a malicious exit node owner, there's really no need to worry about MITM unless said node owner has compromised a certificate authority or has an 0day for your browser that will make it ignore the invalid cert. If either of those are true, you (and every other web user) has much bigger problems than some exit node admin seeing how much lunch money you have in your checking account.

But, yes, for all stuff not tied to one's real identity, one should be using Tor.

You do realize that when enough people get on a list, the list becomes useless? You do realize that everyone should be trying to get on a list as an act of civil disobedience? You do realize that the very existence of lists that people like you are afraid of is an affront to freedom-loving, right-thinking people?

t.guy on several lists Teller-Ulam weapon design aluminum tube highly enriched PRISM antibiotic-resistant anthrax crop duster ECHELON

It was always placebo from the beginning.

False.
The only websites who gets unusable are those with canvas and mandatory JS, if these websites cannot work without them then they aren't worthy of your time.

No he isn't.
Tor is "quote"Crème de la Crème"unquote" not only because of it's configuration but because of the mesh network the Tor browser works with 99% of websites with standard security, at maximum it's 90% these 10% are websites made by people with bad motives they aren't worth it.

My man (I would preffer to move to Gnunet tho).
But lets remember some good oldies for newcomers.

>2014 The Love Zone (TLZ) bust: Australian's Task Force Argos was able to track down TLZ hidden service admin Shannon McCoole (skee) on google through his odd word misspellings and unusual greeting 'hiyas'. They arrested McCoole and ran the site for 6 months. Caught many users by embedded exploits in video files, including en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Huckle

There was one case which I can't find anymore but it was basically that the guy ONLY used Tor to connect to his server and not a lot of people in the area he was was doing it so it was easy (but long) for the FBI to find time correlation between time of posting and connection and after elimination of suspect they bugged his house and router and it proved to be him, if the guy would have used Tor 7/7 24/24 the FBI couldn't have made any good correlation.

The moral of the story is: It's hard to properly anonymise & secure a web server. Police rarely attack the anonymity networks themselves, but look for hosting mistakes and OPSEC failures. It doesn't matter what anonymity tool you use, the server will eventually be found.
And people who run illegal sites are dumb.

This. Tor developers explicitly encourage as many people as possible to use it for this very reason.

Only one?
t. Tor, gun, and cash using free man

Wasn't that the Silk Road case?

I decided to start writing an article about it on my web site, here:
spyware.neocities.org/articles/waterfox.html

This is a kind of brief article, so anyone who knows more about it could probably submit some corrections and changes since I personally don't use Waterfox.

So once again, Pale Moon and Basilisk are the only Firefox-based options left.

An american list.

You forgot
You're welcome! ^_^

Just compile the latest version yourself.

your website design SUCKS

improve it, and I might help

How's this?:
spyware.neocities.org/articles/example.html

I think that it looks more readable to just leave everything plain. I can move all the articles to this style, i'll do that sometime later today probably.

HMMMM

Attached: 6e959b9af1a1d3edb93d346244a1cabf48aed737aa7ff1950c6a1906cd325274.png (500x275, 18.42K)

Why does it take up only half the page? Web browsers can wrap text.

Some people wanted it to take up half the page, and others didn't when I first made a thread about this site a few months ago. I decided to make it take up half the page because that seemed to be the best option, it makes the text more compact. It uses the "max-width: 800px" attribute of "p" in a style section, so I think you can override the CSS to disable that?

Center the damn headers and images at least. Use some fucking CSS. What will you do when you want to change one thing in the design? Edit all the articles by hand?

Also, the article list is fucking ugly. Small font and NOT CENTERED. There should be a small icon besides the software name. What will you do when the site has 100 articles?

And the example article is, of course, terrible and doesn't explain shit. And isn't even consistent with the actual articles. Just delete it until you have something better.

I get it, I am thinking of doing something like having a few lists for different categories of software, and have them side by side. I've been slowly improving the site lately, by doing stuff like deleting the shitty "criteria guide", unifying the "spyware rating" (It used to use a few different types of rating systems, because everyone who wrote an article used their own scoring system for their articles) to one rating, and writing a few new articles, but as you can tell its still very messy and needs a lot of work.

That's better, but you still need a global CSS file. The ability to change the design in one swoop is INVALUABLE. If you don't have that, any design change means EDITING EVERY INDIVIDUAL ARTICLE BY HAND. Imagine that with 100 of them.

I understand, I'll look up how this stuff works.
You can tell that i'm no web-developer cause of how bad I am at this... I started fixing the site lately because Stallman's website links to the discord article, and now it gets a lot more traffic, so I don't want it to be so disappointing.

Well I apologize for jumping on you then. I thought you were making a design like that on purpose (for some minimalistic bullshit reason).

Put in the section of every article, and then put all the CSS in that file. For example, if you want to have all the titles centered, do:

h1 {text-align:center}

Even better is to use classes, because then you can use regular h1 for something else than titles. For example:

.title {text-align:center; font-size:20px; color: skyblue; font-family:Tahoma}

And then . If you change one parameter in the .title class, all the article titles will be affected! Isn't that convenient?

Why not just build a version without google?

Call me back when Firefox works with ALSA.

No, the silk road retard got caught cuz he posted on the clearnet asking for help setting up a TOR service or something like that. They then used 2 undercover agents disguised as a couple to arrest him before he could turn off his machine while he was accessing TOR in a coffee shop.

Just watch this (one of the best defcon talks ever):
youtube.com/watch?v=7G1LjQSYM5Q

Thx for warning me I used that as secondary browser.

Why are tripfags so retarded?

online banking and stocks use SSL
not saying SSL is unbreakable, but it's pretty solid.

it's better to get on that list but have privacy
also people who visit 8ch go to similar list anyway.

Strongly disagreed
using Tor with services with your real identity has a lot of sense:
-you hide your location. they cannot check in what country/city/ISP are you located in
-you hide your real IP, so they don't know what ISP you use, and what other activities are performed from your IP
-they don't know if it's really you using the service, or some other person that knows your credentials. you could claim someone else used your account to do some action

I use Tor only for Child Pornography

google > "icecat-win64"
second link