GIMP 2.10 released!

GIMP 2.10 is out and it actually seems to be a decent upgrade over 2.8.

gimp.org/news/2018/04/27/gimp-2-10-0-released/

Attached: Screenshot from 2018-04-27 22-26-30.png (1920x1080, 1.68M)

Other urls found in this thread:

flathub.org/apps/details/org.gimp.GIMP
gmic.eu/
gimp.org/release-notes/gimp-2.10.html
github.com/GNOME/gimp
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pareidolia
phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=GIMP-2.10-GTK4-Planning
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

Link to flatpak:

flathub.org/apps/details/org.gimp.GIMP

are the filters backwards compatible?

this is super cool
too bad there's no macOS build yet

Attached: Stop-AIDS.jpg (3157x3157, 487.38K)

Try it before complaining. There actually is a lot of new shit in this release.

Attached: 3b61e801a7fcbd0b812e5c76798f8256a04f531902581c65d105d2a36cdd056e.png (1749x1656, 343.29K)

Flatpak is actually less harmful than Snap. No systemd dependency for one thing.

A cheap Intuos from Wacom. But I didn't make the screenshot.

Attached: 3_500.jpg (500x500, 21.23K)

You mean the GIMP's or G'Mic?

I don't know what G'Mic is. I am talking about the GIMP filters and scripts. Are 2.8 filters/scripts compatible within 2.10?

gmic.eu/

From what I'm seeing, 2.10 should be compatible with 2.8.

Seems like some decent software. Thanks for the link.

Thanks for the info user.

Pepper is a cute!

Attached: SpiceandFire.png (885x691, 883.22K)

Would you prefer a fucking PPA?

Attached: d70635b7e22aed9f6d79dcea8b9f5374.jpg (675x900, 101.13K)

Shit. I wasn't kidding:

gimp.org/release-notes/gimp-2.10.html

Still Gtk2?

github.com/GNOME/gimp
You don't have to wait for some fag to fudgepack it for you.

Might save a little space, but it sure takes a lot longer. I'll just take the Flatpak.

Attached: C_jYC_JVoAEBJ1h.jpg:large.jpeg (700x950, 73.03K)

Are they actually making progress on squashing bugs?

Either way, nice to see at least an illusion of progress. Or that the project isn't dead.

INSTALL GENTOO NOW

h-hi guys, where is the w-windows version...?

Attached: 908cd8d507b459d2ae9322d40244a8ca16f11a457b135bc7ac7b3704a4298835.gif.jpg (252x255, 12.72K)

"There is no Windows installer yet, sorry. Please check back later."

Attached: All_users_of_Windows_are_suckers.mp4 (1280x720, 598.46K)

DELETE MACROSHIT WANGBLOWS
INSTALL GENTOO

Attached: pointing.jpg (1000x720, 60.17K)

Long have I waited for this day.

woah they have a dark theme now. Holy shit.

the OP image is a visual hack btw:
if you look at the thumbnail from a distance/defocused, you might see something completely different — a close-up of a guy from the side, with 1 eye and the nose in the visible area

something like this

Attached: whoops.png (294x188, 25.95K)

< Pareidolia (/pærɪˈdoʊliə/ parr-i-DOH-lee-ə) is a psychological phenomenon in which the mind responds to a stimulus, usually an image or a sound, by perceiving a familiar pattern where none exists.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pareidolia

Or maybe you wanted to call David Revoy a merchant because that image was shilling his Liberapay?

Attached: whoops_.png (294x188, 29.16K)

There actually seems to be a shit ton of new features. But, yeah, the theme is easier on the eyes.

Attached: Screenshot from 2018-04-28 06-01-16.png (1920x1080 1.95 MB, 1.95M)

Also, it seems the GIMP has basically integrated Mypaint's painting engine and brushes. So it kinda is starting to step into Krtia's territory.

Also, way to EEE Mypaint, GIMP.

Attached: Screenshot from 2018-04-28 06-05-52.png (1920x1080, 1.81M)

I don't really see anything wrong with Revoy making one (and so far the only one) promo image for Librepay. Hell, more people should be shilling that place over Paytreon.

Attached: DYNAU1yUMAAbndW.jpg:large.jpg (800x800, 29.98K)

No. Although you can overlay you-know-what over that >>905660
and it will blend. :D

Should be one before long.

How do you know?

Gimp has gone through major changes in the back end
Just because it does not have new buttons doesn't mean the project is abandoned

...

Checked

Is this like the Photoshop's warp, or like the Photoshop's liquify.


This sounds exciting, I might actually try it out. And it looks kind of neat, doesn't look like it's from Windows 98 era anymore.

Because that's what the developer just said on Twatter.

link? / what about macOS?

Nigger, did you even look at that changelog? This is a MAJOR update.

Attached: 396b2e5d71bf231a8589e8090383f2f83f69d7b1dc093e459ea7998593d7c76e.jpg (1140x1136, 87.31K)

Attached: dae9896d-544f-4052-9c6a-9fa1f4053321.png (640x438, 56.94K)

I don't know what are you replying to, but I wouldn't consider Intuos cheap. Mine was around 270 bucks, I could have bought half a meter of tablet if I had went with Huion. Though this was from local store, might be cheaper in America.

It's still GTK2. The Gimp 2.10 release was their main focus while the GTK3 port is less important to the team.

The model in the picture is about 60-70 USD. And that was a couple years ago.

I thought they were skipping GTK3 and going directly to GTK4?

Theming is supposed to be handled by your window manager, not the Gimp program.

yes

What about the new model that recently came out? Intuos M something?
I tried to look it up, but got annoyed, link from Wacom took me to Indian store and I'm no where near India.

Attached: wood erecting.jpg (750x542, 37.54K)

The last time I saw it, the GTK3 version of Gimp compiled but still needed some work. I hadn't seen this news about GTK and Gimp. phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=GIMP-2.10-GTK4-Planning

All GIMP really needs now is CYMK. It's interface is still autistic, but it has most of the features I need.

Attached: DXwZENNU8AAvG5K.jpg (460x644, 46.27K)

CMYK is govno without tasks.
if there is any colorspace which supports full color range (such as CIE XYZ), conversion to CMYK is trivial and fully automatic anyway.

yeah right we all believe that don't we.
PAJEET PLS GO

window decorations are handled by the WM but the interior of the window is controlled by the program.

I'm in Europe, fuck you buddy. It's not my fault Wacom has a retarded site.

You fooooooooooool. Fellow pajeet. Tell me how to get hot sexy gf. I need hot sexy gf. I need tall westernized indian woman. She must dominate me but not too much.

No, you tell me how much the new Wacom Intuos M model costs in America, because I can't be bothered to look it up.

here you go

Attached: Ashleigh Shackelford.jpg (1200x900, 170.46K)

In the time to make that post you probably could've done it yourself.

Attached: 1b3e5f3a7499164a546da76ddfeb5a0723a9eefb67b0060f9e5e810e55d523b7.jpg (800x695, 321.82K)

Too much MAFF!

Attached: 81cafcba2f208fa930301ce31299f7480692ca40c9de9d21197e1a9567035110.png (2024x3522, 3.93M)

I see your point and I've thought about it, but that's where it ended.

Attached: BfjcbeaCMAAEWsR.png (599x536, 358.24K)

Attached: xlarge.jpeg (1024x889, 126.22K)

Fucking finally!

It's a shame they took her tiddies away in the remake...

you mean nipples?

Attached: nipple driver.jpg (1950x1305, 386.5K)

I mean they gave her the Nu Lara treatment.

Attached: 236477-20161120185804_1.jpg (250x334 308.2 KB, 33.93K)

I have no idea what the fuck it is

The term 'tiddies' covers the whole package.

Attached: 88a4b8f74f4671fa8019efb7db02504a--tifa-lockhart-final-fantasy-xv.jpg (600x697, 49.31K)

We're starting to derail, so let this suffice: Nu Lara had her sexiness toned way-way down from her last incarnation. AND it would seem the same thing is happening to Tifa in the PS4 remake.

There any downside to performance by running this in Flatpak?

Bigger boobs doesn't mean more sexiness. Nu Lara is a far more relatable body type of a badass chick who is capable of performing acrobatics for multiple days with minimal rest.

not everyone is turned on by BIG boobs

true

They were iconic to the character, and even the first couple of movies acknowledged this. The newer ones decided to say fuck all that, and replace Jolie with this. The saddest part is this one fanart has more breasts than her.


Saved.

Attached: Loli Croft.jpg (1280x1920 153 KB, 191.6K)

Why is that 12 yr old boy wearing a bra.

I like small boobs, but that is just a man's body type. Doesn't even look like a woman if you cover the face.

Can you draw a circle now?

No, but you can draw a pepper which is close enough.

Gimp has always had different ways to draw a circle.

hollyjew trap/10

YES
The day Gimp requires me to install (((GTK3))) is the day I stop upgrading it.

They did WHAT!?!? I thought Sony as a nip company was supposed to be immune to Western sjfaggotry?
Fucking hell. At least we can stay with the original (and best) version.

You two forgot to say no-homo~ In adult women, we are evolutionary wired to like larger breasts (to a point).

And as a character, Nu Lara is far more dull than her original over the top and borderline-sociopath predecessor. Hell, even Legends Lara had more flavor. The problem with Nu Lara is that everything she does has to be grounded more in reality. This makes her, and the world she takes you though more boring.

Attached: Lara-Croft-Tomb-Raider-Anniversary-Hits-the-Wii-2.jpg (240x170 104 KB, 10.94K)

Here:

Step 1: Load mildly lewd image into the GIMP

Step 2: Select the 'Ellipse Select Tool'

Step 3: Drag mouse over image to draw circle

Step 4: Go to 'Edit > Stroke Selection'

Step 5: Select brush and size in the popup menu

Final Step: Click 'Stroke' (lewd).

Attached: xlarge.jpeg (1024x576, 133.88K)

Good news! The GIMP team has seid they aren't going to make a GTK3 version.

Wait, so they'll support Google's obsolete-out-the-door WebP format, but I still have to use a shitty hack to get half-assed APNG support in Gimp Animation Pack?

APNG was never an official format though.

APNG is shit outside of a handful of very specific circumstances, and tries to make a format for still images into a video format. Just like use lossless video. What you should be upset over is new formats that are better than webp and need exposure not being supported, like FLIF or maybe HEIF.
Here's some of my tests. The original image is 7.07mb uncompressed.
PNG with -9 compression gives me a file that is 371kb in half a second. Using zoplfipng gives 326kb in just under a minute.
FLIF gives me a file that is 159k in just under 5 seconds.
Webp is better than PNG, but not as good as FLIF. It gives a file of 214kb in 1 second when using lossless compression. If I crank up the compression level to max it gets to 203kb in 13.3 seconds.
I would compare HEIF with this, but I can't get it to compile correctly. That or the poor documentation prevents me from using the binary that might be the writer. If I did do it correctly, then the file I got was about 270kb but was near-instant. Not sure if that's lossless or lossy.
tl;dr: FLIF is much better than PNG or Webp and the GIMP should support it.

APNG is cancer. The sooner it dies the better.

APNG can't ever die because it never really lived in the first place.

SOMEHOW, they've gotten the idea that tits are no longer marketable in the US.

Attached: Screenshot from 2018-04-29 01-38-23.png (1920x1080, 1.78M)

I'll believe when support is removed from all major browsers.

Hiring American (((marketing experts))) so that they ruin your product for ideological reasons. What a great idea.
sage for offtopic, pls do the same next time

I'm using falkon and apng doesn't work. This has not been a hindrance to me, ever. Therefore apng is dead.

...

Hey, at least I made the reply IN the GIMP. That said, yeah, I'll get back on track.

One thing I'm wondering is how much the GIMP project and devs get through crowd funding. Anyone know? I'm pretty sure it's a lot less than Krita or even David Revoy.

Attached: pepper_and_carrot_mini_freed__by_nartance-dc4y3bh.png (2024x1556, 3.19M)

I don't care about (((major browsers))). If I can use a browser without APNG support yet never notice the lack of APNG support (i.e. there's no APNG content on the web), then it's dead.

As long as support is sufficiently widespread, some idiots may start using it on a popular website - and forcing browsers to keep compatibility forever.
And Mozilla is full of idiots, they were are the ones pushing this shit format to this day.

I don't think that is going to happen. GIF is still the normie way to upload animations. And (((Imgur))), for example, has switched to converting them to WEBM. I'd say there is around a 70% to 80% chance that APNG will never take hold. And if it does, oh well, at least it's better than GIF :^)

Attached: imgurjew.jpg (476x618, 215.83K)