Richard Stallman Talks About Microsoft(R)'s Azure Sphere OS(TM)

Oh no! I'm so sad that rms has dementia O_O and mental problems o__o

Heres a question: Where did u get the inspiration to OwOpost?

why would that be "stuck in the past? Did Linux's purpose as a kernel change all of a sudden? Are free software and open source the same now? Are the four freedoms any less relevant?
Keep in mind that 90% of people have no understanding of any of this stuff, so hes trying to spread the message. Its so sad that people dont understand how important software freedom is ;_;

this too.

0_0 you're so c-c-creeeepy! why are you pretending to be m-me? Q_Q i'm s-s-scared...

I would trust Linus more if he abandoned the foundation, but he won't. Apparently he doesn't mind being owned by Microsoft and working with a bunch of Mac users that are exactly the kind of people that you would expect them to be. There is no way he can't see where this is going, so I assume he doesn't care.

So, who replaces him when he dies? soon

How is that last line not making it obvious that he's joking

Im not. u are pretending to me me! >_<
thats ok you're doing a good job of it ^_^

he's not. stallman.org/articles/texas.html

> This. You could theoretically use a bootloader like syslinux as a shell, just passing an `init=` parameter to the kernel to run your programs, then rebooting.
You are proving the point of the people who say that Linux is not an OS. Linux is just a component for an OS (a very big and important one though), and you still need to add things to complete it. Even if "things" consists of a just a bootloader. And if you add GNU to Linux it's GNU/Linux, if you add syslinux it's syslinux/Linux. No one said that GNU was somehow sacred and couldn't be substituted. In the same way you could also combine GNU with another kernel, like GNU/Darwin or GNU/Hurd (which I guess would be just the GNU operating system then).


package you installed.
X11 and KDE are not required for a complete operating system, but you need to add something to Linux to be a complete OS.

No one said you cannot, you can also use GNU without Linux. The point is that if and when you combine these exact two together the correct name is GNU/Linux.

No fair! >_< That tripcode's f-fake!

I combine GNU and linux.
What happen if I add systemd.
Is it not a gnu linux anymore.
Is it become a gnu systemd linux.
You fooooooool.
No I am not pajeet.