Malware found in Snaps distributed by Ubuntu

glibc's static linking fucking sucks

There is a good reason FatElf was rejected by Linus, whereas AppImage and Flatpak get his support.

OH NO NO NO

i hope they run him down

Attached: 1473884635179.png (657x527, 20.74K)

link?
could not find anything about it, was it already deleted?

reddit.com/r/linux/comments/8iupdz/caution_the_are_malware_snaps_in_ubuntu_snaps/

Flatpak and AppImage have made life sticking to LTS releases MUCH easier. But yeah, we are going to have to hold Canonical and the Flathub guys to account when shit like this happens.

Attached: da7abca15b4d97096ea763159c848928.gif (400x596, 63.5K)

well i mean, it was indistinguishable from malware in the first place but okay

i'm not talking about fatelf. i'm not talking about multiple architectures, arm, x86, etc, in the same binary, just regular static compiled x86 binaries.

what are the problems? i've only done it a couple of times and given I didn't test the result on 10 different distributions but i've never had problems.

great, here's the solution. we need the equivalent of pozjew and chromium's forced add-on signing even for shit that isn't in the appstore, now on your desktop.

we need a bunch of kikes to sit and moderate software that is specifically not in the moderated package repositories. surely this will go well. this nigger did this on purpose to bring down censorship on flatpack and snaps or whatever the fuck else.

Attached: oyvey.png (740x614, 106.59K)