Hurrdurr ms bought github

Fucking retards

Attached: 1528298897025.jpg (691x830, 88.79K)

Other urls found in this thread:

gitlabfan.com/why-gitlab-is-slow-and-what-you-can-do-about-it-bca9d61405bd),
github.com/gogs/go-gogs-client/wiki/Repositories#migrate).
venturebeat.com/2018/04/06/why-and-how-gitlab-abandoned-microsoft-azure-for-google-cloud/
gitgud.io
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

These hipsters would all collectively ejaculate if Google had bought it instead. "open sores" advocates got what they deserve. I think one of the BSDs even uses Github for their development.

That's a valid counterpoint to the most unhinged paranoia, but it doesn't address concerns that Microsoft is going to make Github worse in completely open, above the table ways. Microsoft might provide Gitlab's hosting but that doesn't let them interfere with Gitlab's policies.

Free Software chads use Savannah (for GNU projects) and Notabug (for a miscellaneous of projects).

Attached: hello.jpg (492x661, 105.25K)

It's weird that Microsoft was the netblock owner, but they're with fastly now.

Attached: 1.png (744x767, 73.73K)

I've seen them around, but I'm never sure. Do those sites encourage collaboration like GitHub, or are they more like SourceForge? Ever since I've deleted my GitHub account, it kind of sucks. Firstly, I can't really work with most libre projects, and, secondly, my employers probably won't look at any other hosting site.

Exactly. Why do people care if Microsoft affects the affairs of GitHub? We all knew this was the logical conclusion of a commercial service. Why can't we resent GitHub's buyout simply for what it entails pedagogically? Is that really not enough?

Let's think of creative ways Microsoft can destroy GitHub, maybe it will come true.

1. Microsoft account mandatory for new registrations.
2. Enforcement of a new CoC and deletion of projects that don't comply.
3. Mass deletion of projects that may violate Microsoft's patents.

4. injection of microsoftware into binaries that are uploaded to github

Alas, gitforked.com is already registered and points to some schmuck's facebook page. There ends the joke and thus my only interest in git.

Gitlab allows for self-hosting.
Back to /g/ you insufferable faggot.

nope

gitlab is your best bet then. I've seen it used first hand in enterprise environments. Which is one reason a former company I worked with switched to it (that's how I learned about gitlab).

this one is so badly GIMPed.

It will work at most once. And this will be the end of Microsoft.

'Hosted by' doesn't mean shit. Microsoft doesn't have any meaningful influence over Gitlab. Anything they could consider doing would just destroy their hosting business. Meanwhile, Gitlab can leave at any time. One day, Azure; the next day, SoftLayer.
This is so stupid I don't even think it's Microsoft FUD. Just someone who thinks every landlord in a city is the same because they all have the same municipal water supplier.

gitgud.io

Yeah. Sounds like a shitty compromise, though, since GitLab is hosted by GitHub, but I guess it's better than working under the GitHub name. I've actually used a GitLab repo every once and a while, so, there's that.

Attached: photo_2018-06-06_17-40-18.jpg (712x156, 28.43K)

Microsoft's influence over GitHub is literally the last of your concerns, you sensationalist dolt. The issue of GitHub's buyout is what it represents. If you could guarantee that Microsoft did nothing to GitHub but still owned it, does that some how make it good in your retarded logic?

Nice try, proprietary cuck.

Attached: scrot-2018-06-06-T12:51:10.png-croped.png-croped.png (497x184, 12.28K)

Why?

Non-consequentialists leave

WE MUST INFILTRATE THE MEGACORPS

Attached: CyberPunk_gondola.webm (1000x1000, 8.78M)

illiterates shouldn't be memeing

Because I don't have a web server. It also puts up an additional barrier for contribution if people have to sign up for yet another service just for this one project.

Ironically, you're the non-consequentialist here for relying on hyperbole in order to justify your hysteria.

NotABug seems like the best alternative. Being hosted by GitHub notwithstanding, GitLab is slow (gitlabfan.com/why-gitlab-is-slow-and-what-you-can-do-about-it-bca9d61405bd), so not very pragmatic for big projects.

NotABug's backend, Gogs, is nearly identical to that of GitHub, so there's not much in terms of features for GitHub that you couldn't find for NotABug. However, Gogs is also libre, which means its userbase can help implement additional features where GitHub cannot. You can import your GitHub through their RESTful API (github.com/gogs/go-gogs-client/wiki/Repositories#migrate).

Attached: notabug-lg.png (713x689, 61.95K)

is notabug hosted by github?

Attached: 1301559929.jpg (366x360, 36.57K)

No, notabug is hosted by Hetzner Online. It's GitLab that's hosted by GitHub, like in the OP pic. Of course, you can run your own instance if GitLab, thus GitGud; although, the people who host GitGud are proprietary cucks (see ).

A-boo boo boo muh companies! Muh crow soft! Muh SJW-level pedantic corporate politics over muh actual software!

Looks like you have to, date I say it, grow up and act like adults. Scary I know

Attached: joey-shrug.gif (192x231, 347.87K)

Incorrect, see

For the record, NotABug is fairly comparable to GitHub, but Savannah is very regressive, even worse than SourceForge.

i really like notabug

Attached: 1484769433937.jpg (307x460, 34.88K)

It's amazing how much text you can put into a post while literally saying nothing.

self-host your shit or don't use your shit online.

🤔???

Attached: Screenshot_2018-06-06-14-20-36.png (1440x2560, 343.36K)

Germans love their GPL shit.

GNO.

what is their coc?

I'm pretty sure they need a CoC for legal purposes.

Yeah, sure. And enforcing it on users too. Fuck off, you and your faggotry. Repo.or.cz is the only answer.

Are you the owner of that? I've seen it being shilled several times here already.

That seems fine. I just not annoy them or have anything to do with those people. I'll just piss off white cis males.

Attached: cc96682128951cccb8e03be89af999045e0680f22acbe199646bd99fce7f7590.png (1200x1485, 2.13M)

...

Well I don't use git as a shitposting or political tool so I really see no issue with this.
This board has a code of conduct. It's in the sticky.

you're using github/gitlab to publish your repo online. your hashes are cryptographically signed. why the fuck do you care what site it's on? sage for inane thread

This is why we need a blockchain git replacement. Probably should write it in rust!

Why are you here?

This is just their host service provider, you fucking retard.

Or just finish GitTorrent so it's actually functional.

HURRR

venturebeat.com/2018/04/06/why-and-how-gitlab-abandoned-microsoft-azure-for-google-cloud/

They switched to Google Cloud two months ago faggot.

That's bitbucket, dipshit. GitLab isn't associated with Atlassian. GitLab is owned by GitLab Inc.

GitLab is hosted on Azure, which is Microsoft's cloud service. It's not great, but GitLab is not hosted "by GitHub". How do people get this fucking stupid?

You don't know what an IP address is, do you?

FUCK I JUST FOUND OUT THAT GENTOO.ORG IS HOSTED BY AMAZON=
WHAT DO

gitgud.io

Fuck off GNUfag

...

Gentoo has been pwn'd at the website and bug reporting level for some time now. The forums are fine but still MITM'd. The webservers for the package manager that server package lists are mostly hosted by IP's in (((israel))) due to IP redirects at the ISP level. Although (((they))) don't mess with the packages if you use the right ones, most systemd based packages are backdoored. If you compile with very fucking weird optimizations that elminate types of bugs from compiling at all you can avoid most of the backdooring cancer.

they're not owned by microsoft and they're switching to google cloud you tech illiterate fuckwit

Who gives a fuck where the website is hosted? I couldn't care less.

Show proofs. What IPs, what packages?

Use a united states based proxy to access gentoo.org and check the SSL provider. Now use a hong kong based proxy and access bugs.gentoo.org. The SSL certificate for both sites are different. For me gentoo.org uses (((let's encrypt))) but bugs.gentoo.org uses (((GlobalSign nv-sa))) One of them is MITM'd thereby.

>Use a united states based proxy to access gentoo.org and check the SSL provider. Now use a hong kong based proxy and access bugs.gentoo.org. The SSL certificate for both sites are different. For me gentoo.org uses (((let's encrypt))) but bugs.gentoo.org uses (((GlobalSign nv-sa))) One of them is MITM'd thereby.
The more likely explanation is that they're just hosted by different people on different servers using different certificates.
Have you tried checking in any way, or did you just assume the most harmful explanation? Try contacting the people who manage the servers. If they're in on it, they wouldn't need to use multiple certificates to enable MitMing.

They're different regardless of whether you use proxies or not, idiot.

Oh, well it doesn't change the fact that there shouldn't be two totally different ssl certificates for the same website/subdomain.

They have different IP addresses. They're on different servers. Why should they share a certificate?

...

Have you never heard of load balancing? Domains might redirect to different machines at different IP's but would still use the same SSL certificate. Take for example amazon.com and it's subdomains. They are not all the same IP nor the same server, but the domain and subdomains use all the same name, amazon, and the same SSL provider.

They're not just different servers, they're different websites. Same as python.org and mail.python.org, which also have different SSL certificates.
There's no rule that subdomains need to have the same certificate as the domain they descend from. Sometimes it's a sensible choice, but if they point at essentially separate services that are run separately then sharing a certificate would only make things less secure.

This is a perfect example of domain hijacking. Which is the real python.org? python.org's ssl certificate or the sub-website/domain mail.python.org? You can't prove it either way.

Yes another example would be sys.8ch.net and 8ch.net. They use the same SSL certificate because they are the same website, but sys.8ch.net is a subdomain of the website 8ch.net. They are the same website but sys.8ch.net is dominated by 8ch.net since it is in the name. So when I can go to packages.gentoo.org/forums.gentoo.org/gentoo.org and they all use the same SSL certificate and yet bugs.gentoo.org uses a different one, one of them it MITM'd.

That's a different thing entirely and you're a fucking idiot.

Can you elaborate on what exactly you mean by backdoored? That would be huge if true.

I mever imagined someone running Gentoo would be this retarded.

Attached: eec3d71c4ba71c0cc962df0bda7de88a3c676756ccc2799f0d89b2ec8ccc2c43(3).gif (500x500, 1.89M)

This is completely wrong. You can have wildcard certs, or multi named certs, but you do NOT have to use those.

GITGUD IO is made by Zig Forums, GET IN

It's over lads

EMBRACE

I wonder what will the Extend phase will entail. Improved integration with Visual Studio at the expense of compatibility? Some custom Git commands, Git extensions of some kind which will be difficult/pointless to support outside Windows?

Real chads host their repos themselves.

Web servers are cheap and you should have one.
Add a patch filedrop, no account needed.
Recommend a password manager as an alternative to wanting to only ever sign into Facebook.

also: I wasn't paying attention to chans when this terarogenic cancer sprouted. Please tell me its a redditor thing.
This expression makes me want to drink bleach until I forget it.

No corpo could be worse than the current SJW overlords at GitHub.

...

uninstall gentoo

this is heresy

I'm starting to realize you just don't know what domain names are.

If I visit 8ch.net/tech/, the following happens:
- 8ch.net is resolved to an IP address
- the document at Zig Forums under the domain name 8ch.net is requested from the resolved IP address

If I visit 8ch.net/pol/, the following happens:
- 8ch.net is resolved to an IP address
- the document at Zig Forums under the domain name 8ch.net is requested from the resolved IP address

If I visit sys.8ch.net/mod.php, the following happens:
- sys.8ch.net is resolved to an IP address
- the document at /mod.php under the domain name sys.8ch.net is requested from the resolved IP address

sys.8ch.net and 8ch.net are different domain names. They're allowed to be entirely separate. Domain names are separate from URLs. You can have a domain name without a URL. You can try sshing into 8ch.net, you can try sshing into sys.8ch.net, but you can't try sshing into 8ch.net/tech/ because that's not a domain name.
mail.python.org and docs.python.org don't need to have the same SSL certificate, just like fsf.org and kernel.org don't need to have the same SSL certificates. In both cases, the parent domain is the same, but that doesn't matter. The full domain is what matters.

why are you conflating fsf with linux when linux is operated under its own organization?

Why conflate docs.python.org with mail.python.org when they might be operated by different people on different servers?
They're run by the same organization, but that's no reason to share a SSL certificate.
The point is that docs.python.org and mail.python.org both have python.org as a parent, and fsf.org and kernel.org both have org as a parent. There's no technical rule or convention of any kind that they have to share SSL certificates.