The Cancer Spreads

wtf this needs to end now

Attached: Very_important_information.png (1000x1000, 64.54K)

hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm...

Your argument is as fallacious as "If you've got nothing to hide, you've got nothing to fear."

Slow down on the newpseak, faggot.

I still haven't seen an example of CoCs doing more than upholding basic politeness.
The most I've seen is examples where CoCs didn't do enough - where someone was kept around despite violating the CoC, or the Drupal incident where people tried very hard to expel someone but were initially stopped by the CoC because the person in question hadn't broken it.
I keep seeing threads sounding the alarm bells because some project adopted a CoC, but I haven't seen any follow-ups that justify the panic.

(((Norms))). Entertaining and encouraging jewish-invented mental illness and deviances is not normal.
Why do they keep pushing "the new normal" meme?
The semitic stairs of cultural marxism.

How's the weather in Langley?

hahaha into the loo with go

CoCs are legally worthless. It's placebo that only gives illusions of "more" legitimacy power to those who add it when they already have it.
Drupal is not the only incident this was already discussed to death in a lot of threads like the "FreeBSD internal discussion leaks" or another one in which some user dumped lots of links but I lost it. Btw please do likewise by providing that they have a positive effect from before their introduction, I'm pretty astounded that we are the ones who needs to defend our position when external contractors are the ones who impose this. The burden of proof are on those who started the cocs.
And the CoC did not stop them from removing the guy even tho the guy was normally protected by the CoC great mimic of unfair IRL jurisdiction but without real jurisdiction.

I think CoCs are somewhere between mildly harmful and mildly beneficial. I haven't found any reason to believe they're anywhere near harmful enough to justify the standard Zig Forums response.