New Lazy FP State Restore Vuln Affects All Intel Core CPUs

bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/new-lazy-fp-state-restore-vulnerability-affects-all-intel-core-cpus/

New Lazy FP State Restore Vulnerability Affects All Intel Core CPUs
By Brian Fagioli

Attached: intel-look-inside-logo.png (920x500, 9.46K)

Other urls found in this thread:

marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech&m=152910536208954
archive.fo/Orwpl
youtube.com/watch?v=UaQpvXSa4X8
marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=152883510311011&w=2
github.com/paboldin/meltdown.git
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

Is there no end to these?

Attached: 2b7b71c5df5b770c6ec4963052d4d484425db718cd197b48fcbc40defcf448c2.png (352x308, 131.61K)

>(((coordinated disclosure)))

Man I so regret buying an Intel cpu. I always buy AMD but I was making a gaming rig and needed an Intel because AMD was focusing on the budget segment(value).

Using a core2duo still. I'll be moving to POWER soon enough.

good choice. I will be doing the same for my next PC

Fuck all modern shit tbh. I'm moving to Z80 and 68000.

Bro do u even try? I'm moving to a slide rule and abacus.

more like retar

Attached: 1488019789339.png (601x508, 114.05K)

Attached: 1466094732357.jpg (480x270, 15.07K)

we already know modern CPUs are bloatware. only the most oblivious person would be surprised about a side channel vuln. there are literally tens of thousands

alternatively

I have a large collection of Thinkpads and I'm going to be selling them all off excepting a few '90s units to fund a Talos. Fuck this shit.

Not building your own microprocessors, you're all absolute plebs.
There's even crumbs out there for you peasants, such as project oberon, and yet you still keep going back to intel to be abused another time.

It's probably both.

intel relies on the memory hole.
the average goy will never remember or care about these, the only consequence is they will love windows update even more thinking the constant updates to the botnet spying on him are actually protecting him. it will also encourage users to buy newer processors that don't have these vulnerabilities even though they do, and these processors will be filled with even more botnet than before.

...

MUH SECURITY LARP
Threadly reminder none of these speculative execution bugs has any relevance to anything other than running a sandboxed VM, which 99.999% of CPU time isn't.

marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech&m=152910536208954
disable hyperthreading

heh heh heh

...

this isn't an intel problem you niggerfaggots, x86 is bloated as fuck no matter how you implement it. fuck off back to Zig Forums. stop shitting up the board.

yes there is no end. this is what happens when your CPU architecture is bloated and you try to run sidechannel-sensitive applications on it

Attached: 355647860BCE487DAE8AEE666C479457.jpg (1210x230, 86.48K)

Am I doing it right?

Attached: 20180615_112119.jpg (4160x3120, 4.65M)

Your posting in a LARPthread nigger just hide it and ignore it

Pretty good. Ironic how some Apple products have became the least gay tech in existence now.

Attached: 8078949cd0e811b2d1ee23ac8d53cb41f6a5495bccc1cd2d51b809ac7e44340e.jpg (1592x2048, 214.14K)

...

That's a start, but this is how real men do it.

Attached: 1024px-Osborne_1_open.jpg (1024x1024, 96.5K)

Mildy related news: archive.fo/Orwpl
The ride never ends.

Attached: 0ni_smug.png (1265x1080, 1.15M)

Is there any easy way to do this with Linux?

You misspelled 'tiddie'.

BIOS dipshit

How do i upgrade my thinkpad to amd?
Fuck you intel.

Attached: 77cbb94a039ab32a226d53fbcd630cc349f109802055fe076ba7399ed6c04d6a.jpg (209x203, 24.65K)

You can't. The sockets aren't the same.
Just get Ryzen based laptop.

Is there no sensible option for high performance in single threaded applications on the market?
AMD's pozzed with the backdoor shit but at least they're not ridden with vulnerabilities as badly as Intel. The problem is their single threaded performance is around 20% worse in comparable price-point models.

Disabling multithreading altogether? That's fucking insane.

Here's an unofficial video of Theo's latest talk: youtube.com/watch?v=UaQpvXSa4X8
It freezes in some spots for a few seconds, but otherwise it's not too bad.

Attached: bsdtans.jpg (1500x1200, 540.79K)

...

Why is Brian Fagioli pretending to understand cryptography?

So how in the hell is this mitigated on Linux? Are there patches yet?

No, they're disabling virtual threads.

...

I get that an NDA keeps you from revealing certain information but does it also require you to sperg out like an autist when people figure out what's under embargo too?

marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=152883510311011&w=2

So at which point do we all begin suspecting that these security flaws are deliberate?

[post redacted] tbh

FAGIOLI

Power isn't better. It's all shit! All of it.
github.com/paboldin/meltdown.git

You run away from one shithole to find yourself in another one.

The gayness came later, after they went x86. or at least that's what I tell myself.

Your life is full of constant mistakes.

Little by little, the performance gains are reversed. I wonder if it will reach a point where it's comparable to alternative architectures. Would be hilarious if that happened.

Whatever happened to optimization that doesn't change program behavior?