I hope you're only pretending to be retarded as that's pretty embarrassing otherwise.
C++ Discussion Thread
It's the weakest example you could have used and you act like it proves that GCC is made by lazy people who are leaving out half the standard. I even agree with you that it's better to have standards for your standards. But your point about compiler writers being lazy is just weird. The big 4 are massive pieces of work and C++ compilers are notoriously hard to write.
...
are you the retard from /agdg/ that "worked with c++ for YEARS" and has no idea how the language works?
WW3 can't come soon enough.
But the C++ STD lacks features, user. There still isn't a DateTime class, still no standard networking...
C and C++ developers who want to stay sane should stick with C89 and C++98. After that the languages (mostly C++) became victims of design by committee. It is more trouble than it is worth to maintain projects without a stable base.
--Bjarne Stroustrup
Not literally everything has to go in the std
Yes, it's a simple refcount based garbage collector.
Nope, and if you can't see smart pointers as being a form of garbage collection maybe you should learn how the language works.
Wrong. A garbage collector implemented with ref counted smart pointers is not the same thing as a smart pointer.