Perfect deepfakes Voice deepfakes (it already exists, see google's audio AI) Nudity ML, it's possible to determine what a girl looks like nude using ML AR tech to make the celeb of your choice show in your room
Will this be censored? Is it being censored right now? Will Nvidia try to put hardware blocks into their gpus to stop this from being created?
Get your degenerate ass out of here. The problem is the restriction that are enabled with shit excuses, not the excuses themselves. Let your kids get fuck in the ass with your third sexual revolution.
Sebastian Morales
Meh. Unless it can accurately determine how her vulva looks like (things like innie or outie) I'm not interested, I can imagine a girl naked just fine that's no big deal but actually knowing for sure how each part of her anatomy looks like is what really matters.
Jordan Taylor
I won't call it censorship, but it's certainly held back by the companies making those claims not sharing their data sets. We have all those cool machine learning algorithms right now but no way to reproduce results because they all require expansive and expensive data sets to train.
Zachary Rodriguez
no thanks
John Walker
Why would anyone want to see a celeb naked? They're all ugly bimbofied kikes.
Zachary Kelly
What about using deepfakes to fuck with the kikes? Like defamation but for lulz?
Tyler Smith
>>>/g/
Jose Thomas
No. You can't just create data where there is nothing. Sure, you could get a basic outline, but you'd still need something along the lines of an x-ray or IR system to see beneath the clothes.
Lucas Mitchell
This. Isn't the primary audience for such tech normalfags eroding the credibility of cellphone nudes from Stacy classmates?
Jaxson Turner
The third sexual revolution will be sexbots and artificial wombs making females outdated. This is just porn. Of celebrities who frequently wear so little they may as well be starring in a porno to start with. Utterly pointless until I can take a picture of the neighbor's 18 year old daughter and the computer spits out a movie featuring her by next morning. It'll probably still be censored by way of government licenses and proprietary tech ensuring that only the (((correct))) people can make a buck off it.
Sebastian Gomez
C'mon user, no need to impose artificial restrictions on yourself :^)
Justin Carter
But why? >>>/tmz/
Adam Barnes
No, use it to fuck with (((the people who fears us)))
Caleb Stewart
Imagine jerking off to a video of yourself fucking yourself. This will be a real possible thing you could produce.
Actually, what turns me on is the fact the actual woman is in the room. Some copy wouldn't make my dick as hard, just like sexbots wouldn't be anything but a masturbatory toy. I NEED to know the actual woman is here in the room debasing herself in sex.
Samuel Ross
You degenerates are missing the point. BLACKMAILING
Chase Robinson
fuck the fuck off back to >>>/g/ deepfakes was utter shit and a prime example of how normalfags believe AI is super advanced now but it's actually still shit. i hope you're trolling
Oliver Ramirez
defamation doesn't actually have anything to do with kikes. you are probably a Markoff Chain and are confused because you saw the word "defamation" used together with the "anti defamation league" and jewish interests. but actually defamation is a general concept.
Bentley Jenkins
If anything this makes it harder to blackmail someone. You could just make a video of anyone questioning you.
You have no balls in using it for Zig Forums means. Weak.
I know what defaming means, if we are making fake videos it IS defamation, I just want to target the powers that be.
How would that work?
Kevin Bell
We have a technology that could be used to create false video evidence of anyone, giving it unprecedented potential for abuse, and all you can think of is celebrity porn?
Brandon Reyes
Deepfakes are literally rape and their creators should be jailed.