Can you please fuck off? The people who develop OpenBSD actually use it on their desktops. It may not have a new fs, but the old one works just fine. Package management is superb and nothing like apt/aptitude crap that has stopped being developed since forever. Multithreaded performance is lacking compared to linux because the OpenBSD developers care about correctness and security when they write code. You can get a hell of a speedup when you write spaghetti code.
OpenBSD is great for people who like to get things done. I use it for only one reason: it's the simplest to use OS out there. No bells, no whistles, no hand-holding, great documentation. It does what you tell it to do and nothing more. And let's not forget that if you ever used ssh, you must thank the OpenBSD team for giving it for free.
BSD thread?
Could you please tell me how you reached that conclusion. Go look OpenBSD's source code and then Ubuntu/Debian/etc code. The former can be read and understood much easier.
Actually almost all BSD developers use Macs
FreeBSD Developers*
OpenBSD is the OS I'd like to have on my T60 but every application I tend to use coredumps like a motherfucker.
Oh well, back to Slackware.
Could YOU please fuck off with your fanboyism? While modern UFS is pretty good, it's nowhere near something like XFS for real performances or ZFS for features.
Where did I say apt? Compare it to portage, or even the stuff the other BSDs use; if it doesn't have build time config, it's shit (how do I get 10bit x264, for example?).
What's your point? That OpenBSD isn't bad? Of course it's good; it's just not for workstations.
I could also add that their anti-GPL zealotry is disgusting.
And the communist gnu shill finally reveals himself.
you're probably running programs that use too much memory. increase
the size of your data area with ulimit -d. see man ksh. and stop
running bloated software.
fluxbox?
Fluxbox is inferior to OpenBox in capabilities and code quality.