F1 Analysis

You are a Williams engineer. Your job is to look at the Sky Sports feed because you can't even afford to pay a cute girl with a camera to sneak into the garage of Ferrari or Mercades and find out how to make your gay car be less gay. Your mechanics die every week because they haven't eaten in months. "Aerodynamic Simulation" means looking ahead of you when you sigh. How do you save the company?

Attached: Williams-F1-2018-car-919494.jpg (590x350, 33.04K)

Other urls found in this thread:

hooktube.com/watch?v=INwqyPct8qY
youtube.com/watch?v=B294RfWj1QE
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unsprung_mass
autocar.co.uk/car-news/motorsport-le-mans/fia-confirms-plans-hypercar-based-top-class-le-mans-2020
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Make the car faster

Put all my efforts into designing some very useful feature and share it with Ferrari, Mercedes, and all the other actually competent engineering teams.
Tell them its free to use and modify. Add into the fine print an agressive patent-left license which forces them to open up all the secret technologies they've built into their autos.
Copy it all and then undercut them by building cars relatively cheaply (no R&D required) to which ever consortium of companies want the advertising.
Ferrari and Mercedes and the other companies that invested seriously into developing their F1 cars decide it isn't worth the investment since everyone now has the same performance and features, and pull out of F1.
I send Richard Stallman an email written is Spanish informing him of how I've brought freedom the F1 industry. The industry itself stagnates as there are no more competent engineers working on it to improve the technology.
Zig Forums praises me for the rest of time.

Despite Sergey Sirotkin having more experience, Lance Stroll believes he's qualified to use this increase of 200bhp since he's 19 years old now and an adult and also his dad pays Williams millions of dollars so his son can go bruum brummmm. He crashes into Kimi Raikonnen at 360 km/h and both die instantly. The country of Finland is mildly unhappy but mostly drunk.

Play again?
(Y)es (N)o

Drop F1
Start building LMP2s

Williams dies with Sir Frank

This is almost literally what Renault did to Red Bull, but Red Bull had to pay for the engines obviously. And Red Bull is top 3 while Renault is still shit lol but Renault has the best livery

]spolier[

Attached: renault_f1_team_rs17_3.jpg (4960x3507, 1.05M)

nah

Attached: renault-alpine-36-le-mans-2013-lmp2.jpg (960x640, 161.9K)

Get all the various manufacturers together and declare a 10-year period where new technology can not be introduced to the sport. Define a new set of specs based on the 1970s F1 car and introduce rules like all shifting must be done with a classic clutch/stick device so steering wheels don't cost a million dollars a pop. Reduce driver salary, fire all the rich fag boys, and hire a bunch of rally drivers Scandinavia. Ban the roll cages and other safety devices and put the life of the driver back in his own hands. Allow contact between cars again and get rid of "race control". Replace qualifying with heat races. Mandate old school bias-ply tires and introduce NASCAR style pitting. Make race length at least twice as long. Bring back old track configurations with hairpin/death corners. Publicize the death and drama of the sport as drivers start dropping like flies again.

Attached: dale-2.jpg (2384x3624, 1.38M)

It's nice but black and yellow is superior. Maybe I have detachment issues... (not my actual bike but close enough)

Attached: honda-cb-250-hornet-2015-1.jpg (1600x1200, 668.98K)

Some of your ideas are awesome, some are retarded. I'm sure you're saying all of these ironically which just illustrates how stupid F1 is anyway.

I wish

Attached: Hockenheimring-aerial-view.jpg (865x577, 96.8K)

(samefag)
If I could just extrapolate it, let's do Group B with 80's F1 cars. It's time-accurate and fuckin mental.

Spa is better now than it was then. 1v1 me.

That's not Spa

no shit I'm talking about old tracks being better than newer "safer" versions in general

Some of them were, Like Hockenheim where the forest was part of the legend, now the circuit barely gets near the forest.

I'm not, a real driver would hop in such a machine for free and a real fan would risk death to see it. For example, NASCAR should get rid of the restrictor plate at large tracks. Let the pussies sit 20 rows back and the real fans can sit in the front row and hope to catch a survivor (like a stock car going 250mph).

Rice the F1 car with anime girls, install gentoo, remove botnet and install music player with FLAC support for the driver, so that he can listen to the eurobeat to make him drive faster. We must be careful to use -systemd and -pulseaudio USE flags to prevent adding bloat that could slow us down. The driver's interface on his driving wheel would utilize dwm tiling window manager with CLI tools for displaying essential vehicle parameters. Customized keybindings would allow fast and efficient parameter tuning via custom keyboard daemon running in the background. A cron task would post stats on Zig Forums every minute, allowing us to monitor car's performance in the control room. With all proposed changes we should easily be able to win and get more sponsors.

Attached: a79a4e730e68972c654bc37f1c3c52401334369176_full.png (500x338, 217.49K)

They've already reinvented the wheel so it's just a matter of using it. Using spherical wheels would completely revolutionize cornering.

But looking at the regulations they wouldn't be allowed

Lance Stroll is neither.

Don't worry. Just be Ferrari if you want to skirt the rules. Oh your spherical wheels on your 18DoF craft won the race? Ok we'll look into it next race, but you still get the points. Did you see the bullshit Ferrari tried to pull with their "side mirrors" earlier this season?

pic related

Attached: TotallyNotAerodynamic.jpg (740x493, 68.34K)

Attached: itscrap.webm (640x268, 2.78M)

Find a way around ground effect regulation.

The ideas around prohibiting shit from costing millions of dollars are good. It lowers the cost of entry and makes the sport actually drive innovation on the streets instead of making tech that will never go anywhere but other racecars.

lots of rgb leds and a fast looking logo

Build a car so bad that it kills Lewis Hamilton after somehow convincing him to drive for us. It's like pottery.

Bring back barnstormers.

You realize that's literally every F1 driver right?

It's literally 99% of all racecar drivers. The other 1% are the few who are actually in it of their own will. And without a ton of skill to get sponsorships as well as their passion for racing they'll always be limited to one shitty car and spending all their remaining dayjob shekels on new tires.

>not wanting to hand-crank the 30hp 4-stroke diesel engine of your horseless racing carriage
It's like you don't want to have fun.

GPL-accurate. Well done user.

Attached: 824px-S-IC_engines_and_Von_Braun.jpg (824x1023, 284.48K)

Attached: Hurt.mp4 (648x644, 5.73M)

This is a great idea but I have a better one. Lets just bring back Group B.

This, and while we are at it lets also get rid of 95% of the F1 rulebook and return to the glory days of 70s and 80s F1 where you had 1300hp turbo engines, 6 wheel cars, and cars with fans that sucked them to the track.

There's a lot to be said for this. All the rules since then created a rigid formula and destroyed innovation. It would be better to have simply restricted each car to a fixed quantity of fuel for the race, and permit free innovation in engines etc.

Just go with a box rule like they do with some sailing classes.
If the car fits in the box, it's allowed. Have some sane safety criteria, and things like caltrop dispensers are a no-go obviously.

Holy fuck why was this forbidden?
What the shit? I might give a shit about race cars if they were cool again like that

Too many people were dying and when some spectators finally died it was decided they wouldn't continue with Group B.

hooktube.com/watch?v=INwqyPct8qY

Innovation trumps money so F1 teams like Ferrari which have massive budgets but not a lot of innovative skill pressure the FIA to regulate everything heavily. When everything is regulated money means everything since you just pay a shitload of people to find tiny improvements you can make in order to gain your advantage as well as hire the best drivers so your competitors can't.

The fan car I mentioned, it used a fan attached to the gearbox to move air from underneath the car and create a vacuum which sucked it to the track.
youtube.com/watch?v=B294RfWj1QE

The 6 wheel car was to try and get better aerodynamics by using 4 smaller wheels at the front to achieve the same grip with a smaller frontal cross section.


Rules and regulations in general stifle innovation in basically every creative and economic endeavour one can think of.

The better solution would be to actually restrict fuel tank size since the most costly thing in racing is pit stops.


Actually group B only had a few deaths and they weren't spectator deaths but driver deaths which caused it to be banned. Whats more is that those deaths could have been avoided with some simple change to he safety regulations, current WRC cars are safe enough for the drivers to have survived the crashes that killed the group B drivers.

Attached: tyrrell-inline.jpg (470x265, 82.87K)

Put fuel in the tyres not the tank. You need a wheel, engine, and a driver to get around the track - everything else is superfluous. Look at the ancient wing mirrors still being used. Don't designers read and recite the design regulations while they sleep? F1 requires thinking inside of a box, inside of a box, but winning doesn't - and that's where your problem lies.

Attached: katesmug.jpg (736x576, 63.4K)

Side skirts were the steroids of F1. There needs to be a "do what the fuck you want" league so we get F-Zero, just like there needs to be a "create a mutant" league of baseball. In before Zig Forums's accurate racial commentary.

Why don't they simply set a cap on the maximize amount of spending a team can put into their car?

They would find some gay loophole like making the car cost $1 but giving the pit crew $1,000,000/year salaries.

Holy fuck lmao

Post made by the KKK
©2016-2018 K00l K1d5 K1ub Inc.

You sound just like someone from 1959 who heard the engines were going to be put behind the driver.

The chassis isn't under constant friction and doesn't tend to puncture at high speeds. Putting fuel in tires is fucking retarded.

To someone devoid of creativity, yes certainly - because you assume you are putting fuel into a current (and as I see it wholly ancient) tyre design.
Fuel in the tyres acts as a heatsink under braking, thereby increasing the braking efficiency. The thermal transfer lowers the fuel viscosity throughout the system, and the pre-heated fuel increases the combustion efficiency, which increases the power, and run time on a given fuel load. Designing an engine and fuel tank around the tyre also increases power transfer efficiency as there are losses in power transmission through the axle.
Innovation doesn't come from things you see as 'normal' by definition.

There are further benefits that you could essentially have 4 engines (as one might view it with present day thinking), one in each wheel.
The engine system is currently centralized - rather than distributed, with say 3V/wheel.

Might as well turn the "tyre" into a self-charging battery then.

KERS / ERS already done

Tyres deflate as you consume fuel
You still have to figure out how to extract a fluid from a tank rotating at thousands of rpm
It won't heatsink shit as they're not using drum brakes and the discs are separate from the wheel
You don't want warmer shit as they're on the edge of autoignition, and you don't want autoignition on a gasoline engine.


The fuck is a V

You two, don't talk to me or my fiero ever again

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unsprung_mass

...

Put the engines inside the fuel inside the tires for extra cooling.

...

ultimate F1 unlimited design coming through

Attached: Untitled.png (1920x1080, 34.13K)

FORMULA GNU

Wrong assumption based on outmoded thinking
Wrong assumption based on outmoded thinking. Even in today's F1 does it look like the entire engine rotates with the tyres to you?


historical thinking pattern detected.


yesterdays thinking for tomorrow problems

getting closer

Currently the entire engine system is centralized, the seemingly crazy suggestion I made about the "fuel in the tyre" is part of a distributed engine system. You still have one engine, but it is intelligently spread across the entire car. This allows you to distribute the weight across the entire frame for improved handling characteristics, and also effectively change the engine with a simple wheel change. There are no losses in power transfer to the wheel, as the power comes from the wheel.

Just so you know I'm not a larper, though you probably still wil think that anywyal There was a major change in the design of F1 car bodies that still continues to this day, I predicted that change years before it occurred.

Don't some EVs do that already?

It's close to an electric motor in each wheel, so quite likely, yes.

each of those wheels would easily cost at least a thousand dollars. it will never happen.

I would hire two shit drivers who pay money for the seat, then I would put the least amount of money possible into the car to save up for next season. Then I pay some russians that are friends with my shit driver to kidnap Adrian Newey and force him to work for me. When the season is over, I would put all my money into motherfucker of a car and hire God Jesus Kubica to drive my car.

Kimi's parents had to shit in the woods because they didn't have enough money to buy both a gokart and an in-house toilet, not every driver is rich

/thread final solution

And you were doing so well with the anime grils opener user. Sad tbh.

open books about fluid mechanics, it might help, not completely tho

I'll hijack this thread for racing technology in general.
Shit is going to get crazy soon
autocar.co.uk/car-news/motorsport-le-mans/fia-confirms-plans-hypercar-based-top-class-le-mans-2020