New result

...

Hmm, I forgot that it is only associative for integers, and i isn't an integer.

The identity (e^(ix))^i = e^-x does hold for x < pi. Infinity is greater than pi though...

It seems I will need to come up with another proof to destroy OP.

I should note that the equality seems to hold empirically, but I haven't proved it yet.

You could just ignore it and let the homeless indigence take care of it for you.

You claim you're using non-standard analysis, so why am I seeing limits in your paper? Where are the standard parts? Also you say
lim(theta->inf)[cos(theta)] = 1
Is this some different definition of the limit?

Your questions are too stupid for me to take seriously.

GTFO you cancerous wannabe namefag
>>>/out/

It's OK, every true Zig Forumsnician can parse TeX in their head.

The level of mathematical retardation in this thread is amazing. Stick to computer programs, guys. Math is not your forte.

Alright, I'll ignore your stupid result then.