Is WireGuard part of a government ops?

...

Not an argument

This from the guy who left a flawed random number generator in his kernel for over a decade.

I don't think being a bad coder is bad, but the shier tenacity at which Linus defended it for "muh backwards compatibility" was amazing. It's almost as if having broken randomization was useful to someone...
Really gets those almonds activated, no?

He argumented while you meme'd. This makes you the shill here.

It's made by a Gentoo dev who also made pass, nightmare material for Pottery.

Linus glows in the dark, this much is nearly certain. As Redhat moves more of system d into the kernel we'll see similar shenanigans as vuln after vuln is discovered and not just as PID 0, but inside the kernel.

I've seen my future and it's OpenBSD and 9front.

It's amazing how all it took was one email on their mailing list to sustain FUD for decades.
OpenBSD audited their stack after that email and found nothing.
marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech&m=129296046123471&w=2

tl;dr, yes some dude probably wrote a backdoor but it's highly unlikely it got merged into the main OpenBSD branch.

I am happy to hear the OpenBSD guys are working on a wireguard suite, I have found their configs and utils to be much more sane than linux alternatives.

>marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech&m=129296046123471&w=2
nice damage control KEK

Never heard of Arstechnica in my life. Is it (((compromised)))? who owns it?