What's Zig Forums's opinion on NetworkManager?

I was going to post this.

I think wicd doesn't have VPN support.

it's doodoo just like we concluded in

mega b8

connman does the same
wicd does the same

Both connman and wicd do this better. wicd is slower to respond to changes in network interfaces though, and it stops attempting to reconnect to an access point after a set period of time.

It's the only network manager that I haven't hated using, and the only intel software I don't hate.

connman does :-)

The immense jewry of intel leads me to believe connman might be compromised (on top of the fact that it's literally called con-man), but perhaps that's just me being paranoid. Judging by the archwiki, it does seem to have a convenient command-line tool like the nmcli above.

It's probably true though. Kikes just love rubbing the shit they get away with in your face, hiding in plain sight. I wish the holocaust happened. Polite sage.

Polite bump

It does the job for me but could be better
/thread

Nm-applet doesn't load when my laptop is offline. Which makes it close to useless

Sometimes it hangs trying to get a DHCP lease until I reset my switch or re-lug the ethernet cable, and nm-applet lacks dropout protection for VPNs. Apart form that it's ok I guess.

I preferred the days of modprobing and manually editing /etc/whatever.